Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 290 of 424) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-27159) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(27160-28684) |
Users' Mathboxes
(28685-42360) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | nn0sqeq1 28901 | Integer square one. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑁↑2) = 1) → 𝑁 = 1) | ||
Theorem | 1neg1t1neg1 28902 | An integer unit times itself. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ {-1, 1} → (𝑁 · 𝑁) = 1) | ||
Theorem | lt2addrd 28903* | If the right-hand side of a 'less than' relationship is an addition, then we can express the left-hand side as an addition, too, where each term is respectively less than each term of the original right side. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑐 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 = (𝑏 + 𝑐) ∧ 𝑏 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 < 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | xgepnf 28904 | An extended real which is greater than plus infinity is plus infinity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (+∞ ≤ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = +∞)) | ||
Theorem | xlemnf 28905 | An extended real which is less than minus infinity is minus infinity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Feb-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴 ≤ -∞ ↔ 𝐴 = -∞)) | ||
Theorem | xrlelttric 28906 | Trichotomy law for extended reals. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Sep-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | xaddeq0 28907 | Two extended reals which add up to zero are each other's negatives. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jun-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) → ((𝐴 +𝑒 𝐵) = 0 ↔ 𝐴 = -𝑒𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | infxrmnf 28908 | The infinimum of a set of extended reals containing minus infinity is minus infinity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ -∞ ∈ 𝐴) → inf(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = -∞) | ||
Theorem | xrinfm 28909 | The extended real numbers are unbounded below. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ inf(ℝ*, ℝ*, < ) = -∞ | ||
Theorem | le2halvesd 28910 | A sum is less than the whole if each term is less than half. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Nov-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐶 / 2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ (𝐶 / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ≤ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | xraddge02 28911 | A number is less than or equal to itself plus a nonnegative number. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) → (0 ≤ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐴 +𝑒 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | xrge0addge 28912 | A number is less than or equal to itself plus a nonnegative number. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐴 +𝑒 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | xlt2addrd 28913* | If the right-hand side of a 'less than' relationship is an addition, then we can express the left-hand side as an addition, too, where each term is respectively less than each term of the original right side. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ -∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ -∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < (𝐵 +𝑒 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 ∈ ℝ* ∃𝑐 ∈ ℝ* (𝐴 = (𝑏 +𝑒 𝑐) ∧ 𝑏 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 < 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | xrsupssd 28914 | Inequality deduction for supremum of an extended real subset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Mar-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ*, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ*, < )) | ||
Theorem | xrge0infss 28915* | Any subset of nonnegative extended reals has an infimum. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Sep-2019.) (Revised by AV, 4-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (0[,]+∞) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (0[,]+∞)(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (0[,]+∞)(𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | xrge0infssd 28916 | Inequality deduction for infimum of a nonnegative extended real subset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Sep-2019.) (Revised by AV, 4-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (0[,]+∞)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐵, (0[,]+∞), < ) ≤ inf(𝐶, (0[,]+∞), < )) | ||
Theorem | xrge0addcld 28917 | Nonnegative extended reals are closed under addition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Sep-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +𝑒 𝐵) ∈ (0[,]+∞)) | ||
Theorem | xrge0subcld 28918 | Condition for closure of nonnegative extended reals under subtraction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-May-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +𝑒 -𝑒𝐵) ∈ (0[,]+∞)) | ||
Theorem | infxrge0lb 28919 | A member of a set of nonnegative extended reals is greater than or equal to the set's infimum. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jul-2020.) (Revised by AV, 4-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (0[,]+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐴, (0[,]+∞), < ) ≤ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | infxrge0glb 28920* | The infimum of a set of nonnegative extended reals is the greatest lower bound. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jul-2020.) (Revised by AV, 4-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (0[,]+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (inf(𝐴, (0[,]+∞), < ) < 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 < 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | infxrge0gelb 28921* | The infimum of a set of nonnegative extended reals is greater than or equal to a lower bound. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jul-2020.) (Revised by AV, 4-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (0[,]+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ≤ inf(𝐴, (0[,]+∞), < ) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | dfrp2 28922 | Alternate definition of the positive real numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2020.) |
⊢ ℝ+ = (0(,)+∞) | ||
Theorem | xrofsup 28923 | The supremum is preserved by extended addition set operation. (Provided minus infinity is not involved as it does not behave well with addition.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Mar-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ⊆ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝑋, ℝ*, < ) ≠ -∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝑌, ℝ*, < ) ≠ -∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 = ( +𝑒 “ (𝑋 × 𝑌))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝑍, ℝ*, < ) = (sup(𝑋, ℝ*, < ) +𝑒 sup(𝑌, ℝ*, < ))) | ||
Theorem | supxrnemnf 28924 | The supremum of a nonempty set of extended reals which does not contain minus infinity is not minus infinity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Mar-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ -∞ ∈ 𝐴) → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) ≠ -∞) | ||
Theorem | xrhaus 28925 | The topology of the extended reals is Hausdorff. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Mar-2017.) |
⊢ (ordTop‘ ≤ ) ∈ Haus | ||
Theorem | joiniooico 28926 | Disjoint joining an open interval with a closed-below, open-above interval to form a closed-below, open-above interval. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Sep-2017.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)) → (((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∩ (𝐵[,)𝐶)) = ∅ ∧ ((𝐴(,)𝐵) ∪ (𝐵[,)𝐶)) = (𝐴(,)𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ubico 28927 | A right-open interval does not contain its right endpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Apr-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴[,)𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | xeqlelt 28928 | Equality in terms of 'less than or equal to', 'less than'. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | eliccelico 28929 | Relate elementhood to a closed interval with elementhood to the same closed-below, open-above interval or to its upper bound. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴[,)𝐵) ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | elicoelioo 28930 | Relate elementhood to a closed-below, open-above interval with elementhood to the same open interval or to its lower bound. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴[,)𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | iocinioc2 28931 | Intersection between two open-below, closed-above intervals sharing the same upper bound. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*) ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → ((𝐴(,]𝐶) ∩ (𝐵(,]𝐶)) = (𝐵(,]𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | xrdifh 28932 | Class difference of a half-open interval in the extended reals. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ⇒ ⊢ (ℝ* ∖ (𝐴[,]+∞)) = (-∞[,)𝐴) | ||
Theorem | iocinif 28933 | Relate intersection of two open-below, closed-above intervals with the same upper bound with a conditional construct. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*) → ((𝐴(,]𝐶) ∩ (𝐵(,]𝐶)) = if(𝐴 < 𝐵, (𝐵(,]𝐶), (𝐴(,]𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | difioo 28934 | The difference between two open intervals sharing the same lower bound. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Sep-2017.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*) ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → ((𝐴(,)𝐶) ∖ (𝐴(,)𝐵)) = (𝐵[,)𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | difico 28935 | The difference between two closed-below, open-above intervals sharing the same upper bound. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)) → ((𝐴[,)𝐶) ∖ (𝐵[,)𝐶)) = (𝐴[,)𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | nndiffz1 28936 | Upper set of the positive integers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Aug-2017.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (ℕ ∖ (1...𝑁)) = (ℤ≥‘(𝑁 + 1))) | ||
Theorem | ssnnssfz 28937* | For any finite subset of ℕ, find a superset in the form of a set of sequential integers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Sep-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ℕ ∩ Fin) → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 ⊆ (1...𝑛)) | ||
Theorem | fzspl 28938 | Split the last element of a finite set of sequential integers. (more generic than fzsuc 12258) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Nov-2016.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑀...𝑁) = ((𝑀...(𝑁 − 1)) ∪ {𝑁})) | ||
Theorem | fzdif2 28939 | Split the last element of a finite set of sequential integers. (more generic than fzsuc 12258) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → ((𝑀...𝑁) ∖ {𝑁}) = (𝑀...(𝑁 − 1))) | ||
Theorem | fzsplit3 28940 | Split a finite interval of integers into two parts. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁) → (𝑀...𝑁) = ((𝑀...(𝐾 − 1)) ∪ (𝐾...𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | bcm1n 28941 | The proportion of one binomial coefficient to another with 𝑁 decreased by 1. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Nov-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1)) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝑁 − 1)C𝐾) / (𝑁C𝐾)) = ((𝑁 − 𝐾) / 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | iundisjfi 28942* | Rewrite a countable union as a disjoint union, finite version. Cf. iundisj 23123. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Feb-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑛𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ (1..^𝑁)𝐴 = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ (1..^𝑁)(𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ (1..^𝑛)𝐵) | ||
Theorem | iundisj2fi 28943* | A disjoint union is disjoint, finite version. Cf. iundisj2 23124. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Feb-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑛𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ Disj 𝑛 ∈ (1..^𝑁)(𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ (1..^𝑛)𝐵) | ||
Theorem | iundisjcnt 28944* | Rewrite a countable union as a disjoint union. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Feb-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑛𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 = ℕ ∨ 𝑁 = (1..^𝑀))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ (1..^𝑛)𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | iundisj2cnt 28945* | A countable disjoint union is disjoint. Cf. iundisj2 23124. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Feb-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑛𝐵 & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑘 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 = ℕ ∨ 𝑁 = (1..^𝑀))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ (1..^𝑛)𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | f1ocnt 28946* | Given a countable set 𝐴, number its elements by providing a one-to-one mapping either with ℕ or an integer range starting from 1. The domain of the function can then be used with iundisjcnt 28944 or iundisj2cnt 28945. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ ω → ∃𝑓(𝑓:dom 𝑓–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ (dom 𝑓 = ℕ ∨ dom 𝑓 = (1..^((#‘𝐴) + 1))))) | ||
Theorem | fz1nnct 28947 | NN and integer ranges starting from 1 are countable. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 = ℕ ∨ 𝐴 = (1..^𝑀)) → 𝐴 ≼ ω) | ||
Theorem | fz1nntr 28948 | NN and integer ranges starting from 1 are a transitive family of set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 = ℕ ∨ 𝐴 = (1..^𝑀)) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝐴) → (1..^𝑁) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | hashunif 28949* | The cardinality of a disjoint finite union of finite sets. Cf. hashuni 14397. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Feb-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (#‘∪ 𝐴) = Σ𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (#‘𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | numdenneg 28950 | Numerator and denominator of the negative. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ (𝑄 ∈ ℚ → ((numer‘-𝑄) = -(numer‘𝑄) ∧ (denom‘-𝑄) = (denom‘𝑄))) | ||
Theorem | divnumden2 28951 | Calculate the reduced form of a quotient using gcd. This version extends divnumden 15294 for the negative integers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ -𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ((numer‘(𝐴 / 𝐵)) = -(𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) ∧ (denom‘(𝐴 / 𝐵)) = -(𝐵 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | nnindf 28952* | Principle of Mathematical Induction, using a bound-variable hypothesis instead of distinct variables. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-May-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℕ → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝜏) | ||
Theorem | nnindd 28953* | Principle of Mathematical Induction (inference schema) on integers, a deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 + 1) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → 𝜂) | ||
Theorem | nn0min 28954* | Extracting the minimum positive integer for which a property 𝜒 does not hold. This uses substitutions similar to nn0ind 11348. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-May-2018.) |
⊢ (𝑛 = 0 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑚 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑛 = (𝑚 + 1) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 (¬ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) | ||
Theorem | ltesubnnd 28955 | Subtracting an integer number from another number decreases it. See ltsubrpd 11780. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Apr-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀 + 1) − 𝑁) ≤ 𝑀) | ||
Syntax | cxdiv 28956 | Extend class notation to include division of extended reals. |
class /𝑒 | ||
Definition | df-xdiv 28957* | Define division over extended real numbers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ /𝑒 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ*, 𝑦 ∈ (ℝ ∖ {0}) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ℝ* (𝑦 ·e 𝑧) = 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | xdivval 28958* | Value of division: the (unique) element 𝑥 such that (𝐵 · 𝑥) = 𝐴. This is meaningful only when 𝐵 is nonzero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ ℝ* (𝐵 ·e 𝑥) = 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | xrecex 28959* | Existence of reciprocal of nonzero real number. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 ·e 𝑥) = 1) | ||
Theorem | xmulcand 28960 | Cancellation law for extended multiplication. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ·e 𝐴) = (𝐶 ·e 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | xreceu 28961* | Existential uniqueness of reciprocals. Theorem I.8 of [Apostol] p. 18. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ* (𝐵 ·e 𝑥) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | xdivcld 28962 | Closure law for the extended division. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐵) ∈ ℝ*) | ||
Theorem | xdivcl 28963 | Closure law for the extended division. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐵) ∈ ℝ*) | ||
Theorem | xdivmul 28964 | Relationship between division and multiplication. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 0)) → ((𝐴 /𝑒 𝐶) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 ·e 𝐵) = 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | rexdiv 28965 | The extended real division operation when both arguments are real. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐴 / 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | xdivrec 28966 | Relationship between division and reciprocal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐴 ·e (1 /𝑒 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | xdivid 28967 | A number divided by itself is one. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐴) = 1) | ||
Theorem | xdiv0 28968 | Division into zero is zero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → (0 /𝑒 𝐴) = 0) | ||
Theorem | xdiv0rp 28969 | Division into zero is zero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (0 /𝑒 𝐴) = 0) | ||
Theorem | eliccioo 28970 | Membership in a closed interval of extended reals vs. the same open interval. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵) ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | elxrge02 28971 | Elementhood in the set of nonnegative extended reals. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ↔ (𝐴 = 0 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∨ 𝐴 = +∞)) | ||
Theorem | xdivpnfrp 28972 | Plus infinity divided by a positive real number is plus infinity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (+∞ /𝑒 𝐴) = +∞) | ||
Theorem | rpxdivcld 28973 | Closure law for extended division of positive reals. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐵) ∈ ℝ+) | ||
Theorem | xrpxdivcld 28974 | Closure law for extended division of positive extended reals. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (0[,]+∞)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 /𝑒 𝐵) ∈ (0[,]+∞)) | ||
Theorem | bhmafibid1 28975 | The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. First result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2))) | ||
Theorem | bhmafibid2 28976 | The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. Second result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) − (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2))) | ||
Theorem | 2sqn0 28977 | If the sum of two squares is prime, none of the original number is zero. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0) | ||
Theorem | 2sqcoprm 28978 | If the sum of two squares is prime, the two original numbers are coprime. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1) | ||
Theorem | 2sqmod 28979 | Given two decompositions of a prime as a sum of two squares, show that they are equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2)) = 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | 2sqmo 28980* | There exists at most one decomposition of a prime as a sum of two squares. See 2sqb 24957 for the existence of such a decomposition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃*𝑎 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | ressplusf 28981 | The group operation function +𝑓 of a structure's restriction is the operation function's restriction to the new base. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Mar-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾s 𝐴) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐺) & ⊢ ⨣ Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (+𝑓‘𝐻) = ( ⨣ ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | ressnm 28982 | The norm in a restricted structure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 ↾s 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (norm‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Mnd ∧ 0 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑁 ↾ 𝐴) = (norm‘𝐻)) | ||
Theorem | abvpropd2 28983 | Weaker version of abvpropd 18665. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Nov-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐾) = (Base‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘𝐾) = (+g‘𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (.r‘𝐾) = (.r‘𝐿)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (AbsVal‘𝐾) = (AbsVal‘𝐿)) | ||
Theorem | oppgle 28984 | less-than relation of an opposite group. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppg‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑂) | ||
Theorem | oppglt 28985 | less-than relation of an opposite group. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppg‘𝑅) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → < = (lt‘𝑂)) | ||
Theorem | ressprs 28986 | The restriction of a preordered set is still a preordered set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Preset ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐾 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ Preset ) | ||
Theorem | oduprs 28987 | Being a preset is a self-dual property. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Preset → 𝐷 ∈ Preset ) | ||
Theorem | posrasymb 28988 | A poset ordering is asymetric. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = ((le‘𝐾) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | tospos 28989 | A Toset is a Poset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ Toset → 𝐹 ∈ Poset) | ||
Theorem | resspos 28990 | The restriction of a Poset is a Poset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ Poset) | ||
Theorem | resstos 28991 | The restriction of a Toset is a Toset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ Toset ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ Toset) | ||
Theorem | tleile 28992 | In a Toset, two elements must compare. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Feb-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Toset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∨ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | tltnle 28993 | In a Toset, less-than is equivalent to not inverse less-than-or-equal see pltnle 16789. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Feb-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Toset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ↔ ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | odutos 28994 | Being a toset is a self-dual property. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Toset → 𝐷 ∈ Toset) | ||
Theorem | tlt2 28995 | In a Toset, two elements must compare. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Toset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∨ 𝑌 < 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | tlt3 28996 | In a Toset, two elements must compare strictly, or be equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Apr-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Toset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑋 < 𝑌 ∨ 𝑌 < 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | trleile 28997 | In a Toset, two elements must compare. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = ((le‘𝐾) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Toset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∨ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | toslublem 28998* | Lemma for toslub 28999 and xrsclat 29011. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Feb-2018.) (Revised by NM, 15-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 ≤ 𝑐 → 𝑎 ≤ 𝑐)) ↔ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏 < 𝑑)))) | ||
Theorem | toslub 28999 | In a toset, the lowest upper bound lub, defined for partial orders is the supremum, sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < ), defined for total orders. (these are the set.mm definitions: lowest upper bound and supremum are normally synonymous). Note that those two values are also equal if such a supremum does not exist: in that case, both are equal to the empty set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lub‘𝐾)‘𝐴) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, < )) | ||
Theorem | tosglblem 29000* | Lemma for tosglb 29001 and xrsclat 29011. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Feb-2018.) (Revised by NM, 15-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Toset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 ≤ 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑐 ≤ 𝑏 → 𝑐 ≤ 𝑎)) ↔ (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎◡ < 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏◡ < 𝑎 → ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 𝑏◡ < 𝑑)))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |