Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 253 of 424) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-27159) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(27160-28684) |
Users' Mathboxes
(28685-42360) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | tgbtwndiff 25201* | There is always a 𝑐 distinct from 𝐵 such that 𝐵 lies between 𝐴 and 𝑐. Theorem 3.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 32. The condition "the space is of dimension 1 or more" is written here as 2 ≤ (#‘𝑃) for simplicity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ≤ (#‘𝑃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑐) ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑐)) | ||
Theorem | tgdim01 25202 | In geometries of dimension lower than 2, all points are colinear. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | tgifscgr 25203 | Inner five segment congruence. Take two triangles, 𝐴𝐷𝐶 and 𝐸𝐻𝐾, with 𝐵 between 𝐴 and 𝐶 and 𝐹 between 𝐸 and 𝐾. If the other components of the triangles are congruent, then so are 𝐵𝐷 and 𝐹𝐻. Theorem 4.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐹 − 𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐷) = (𝐸 − 𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐷) = (𝐾 − 𝐻)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐷) = (𝐹 − 𝐻)) | ||
Theorem | tgcgrsub 25204 | Removing identical parts from the end of a line segment preserves congruence. Theorem 4.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) | ||
Syntax | ccgrg 25205 | Declare the constant for the congruence between shapes relation. |
class cgrG | ||
Definition | df-cgrg 25206* | Define the relation congruence bewteen shapes. Definition 4.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. Ideally, we would define this for functions of any set, but we will used words (functions over ℕ) in most cases. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ cgrG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑pm ℝ) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑pm ℝ)) ∧ (dom 𝑎 = dom 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑎∀𝑗 ∈ dom 𝑎((𝑎‘𝑖)(dist‘𝑔)(𝑎‘𝑗)) = ((𝑏‘𝑖)(dist‘𝑔)(𝑏‘𝑗))))}) | ||
Theorem | iscgrg 25207* | The congruence property for sequences of points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ)) ∧ (dom 𝐴 = dom 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑗 ∈ dom 𝐴((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) = ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑗)))))) | ||
Theorem | iscgrgd 25208* | The property for two sequences 𝐴 and 𝐵 of points to be congruent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑗 ∈ dom 𝐴((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) = ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑗)))) | ||
Theorem | iscgrglt 25209* | The property for two sequences 𝐴 and 𝐵 of points to be congruent, where the congruence is only required for indices verifying a less-than relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑗 ∈ dom 𝐴(𝑖 < 𝑗 → ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) = ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑗))))) | ||
Theorem | trgcgrg 25210 | The property for two triangles to be congruent to each other. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉 ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸) ∧ (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)))) | ||
Theorem | trgcgr 25211 | Triangle congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
Theorem | ercgrg 25212 | The shape congruence relation is an equivalence relation. Statement 4.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → (cgrG‘𝐺) Er (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ)) | ||
Theorem | tgcgrxfr 25213* | A line segment can be divided at the same place as a congruent line segment is divided. Theorem 4.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑒 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹) ∧ 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝑒𝐹”〉)) | ||
Theorem | cgr3id 25214 | Reflexivity law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgr3simp1 25215 | Deduce segment congruence from a triangle congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | cgr3simp2 25216 | Deduce segment congruence from a triangle congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | cgr3simp3 25217 | Deduce segment congruence from a triangle congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | cgr3swap12 25218 | Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐵𝐴𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐸𝐷𝐹”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgr3swap23 25219 | Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐶𝐵”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐹𝐸”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgr3swap13 25220 | Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐶𝐵𝐴”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐹𝐸𝐷”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgr3rotr 25221 | Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐶𝐴𝐵”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐹𝐷𝐸”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgr3rotl 25222 | Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐵𝐶𝐴”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐸𝐹𝐷”〉) | ||
Theorem | trgcgrcom 25223 | Commutative law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgr3tr 25224 | Transitivity law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐽𝐾𝐿”〉) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnxfr 25225 | A condition for extending betweenness to a new set of points based on congruence with another set of points. Theorem 4.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | tgcgr4 25226 | Two quadrilaterals to be congruent to each other if one triangle formed by their vertices is, and the additional points are equidistant too. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷”〉 ∼ 〈“𝑊𝑋𝑌𝑍”〉 ↔ (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝑊𝑋𝑌”〉 ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐷) = (𝑊 − 𝑍) ∧ (𝐵 − 𝐷) = (𝑋 − 𝑍) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝐷) = (𝑌 − 𝑍))))) | ||
Syntax | cismt 25227 | Declare the constant for the isometry builder. |
class Ismt | ||
Definition | df-ismt 25228* | Define the set of isometries between two structures. Definition 4.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. See isismt 25229. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ Ismt = (𝑔 ∈ V, ℎ ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:(Base‘𝑔)–1-1-onto→(Base‘ℎ) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)∀𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)((𝑓‘𝑎)(dist‘ℎ)(𝑓‘𝑏)) = (𝑎(dist‘𝑔)𝑏))}) | ||
Theorem | isismt 25229* | Property of being an isometry. Compare with isismty 32770. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐻) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑎) − (𝐹‘𝑏)) = (𝑎𝐷𝑏)))) | ||
Theorem | ismot 25230* | Property of being an isometry mapping to the same space. In geometry, this is also called a motion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↔ (𝐹:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐹‘𝑎) − (𝐹‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏)))) | ||
Theorem | motcgr 25231 | Property of a motion: distances are preserved. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) − (𝐹‘𝐵)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | idmot 25232 | The identity is a motion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ 𝑃) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | motf1o 25233 | Motions are bijections. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃) | ||
Theorem | motcl 25234 | Closure of motions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑃) | ||
Theorem | motco 25235 | The composition of two motions is a motion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | cnvmot 25236 | The converse of a motion is a motion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | motplusg 25237* | The operation for motions is their composition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐼 = {〈(Base‘ndx), (𝐺Ismt𝐺)〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺), 𝑔 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↦ (𝑓 ∘ 𝑔))〉} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(+g‘𝐼)𝐻) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)) | ||
Theorem | motgrp 25238* | The motions of a geometry form a group with respect to function composition, called the Isometry group. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐼 = {〈(Base‘ndx), (𝐺Ismt𝐺)〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺), 𝑔 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↦ (𝑓 ∘ 𝑔))〉} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Grp) | ||
Theorem | motcgrg 25239* | Property of a motion: distances are preserved. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐼 = {〈(Base‘ndx), (𝐺Ismt𝐺)〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺), 𝑔 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↦ (𝑓 ∘ 𝑔))〉} & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ Word 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝑇) ∼ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | motcgr3 25240 | Property of a motion: distances are preserved, special case of triangles. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝐻‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = (𝐻‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐻‘𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
Theorem | tglng 25241* | Lines of a Tarski Geometry. This relates to both Definition 4.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. and Definition 6.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})) | ||
Theorem | tglnfn 25242 | Lines as functions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I )) | ||
Theorem | tglnunirn 25243 | Lines are sets of points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ∪ ran 𝐿 ⊆ 𝑃) | ||
Theorem | tglnpt 25244 | Lines are sets of points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) | ||
Theorem | tglngne 25245 | It takes two different points to form a line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) | ||
Theorem | tglngval 25246* | The line going through points 𝑋 and 𝑌. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧))}) | ||
Theorem | tglnssp 25247 | Lines are subset of the geometry base set. That is, lines are sets of points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ⊆ 𝑃) | ||
Theorem | tgellng 25248 | Property of lying on the line going through points 𝑋 and 𝑌. Definition 4.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. We choose the notation 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋(LineG‘𝐺)𝑌) instead of "colinear" because LineG is a common structure slot for other axiomatizations of geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))) | ||
Theorem | tgcolg 25249 | We choose the notation (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) instead of "colinear" in order to avoid defining an additional symbol for colinearity because LineG is a common structure slot for other axiomatizations of geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))) | ||
Theorem | btwncolg1 25250 | Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | btwncolg2 25251 | Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | btwncolg3 25252 | Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | colcom 25253 | Swapping the points defining a line keeps it unchanged. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑋) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | colrot1 25254 | Rotating the points defining a line. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍)) | ||
Theorem | colrot2 25255 | Rotating the points defining a line. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑋) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | ncolcom 25256 | Swapping non-colinear points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑋) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | ncolrot1 25257 | Rotating non-colinear points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍)) | ||
Theorem | ncolrot2 25258 | Rotating non-colinear points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑋) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | tgdim01ln 25259 | In geometries of dimension lower than 2, any 3 points are colinear. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | ncoltgdim2 25260 | If there are 3 non-colinear points, dimension must be 2 or more. tglowdim2l 25345 converse. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2) | ||
Theorem | lnxfr 25261 | Transfer law for colinearity. Theorem 4.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝑋𝑌𝑍”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | lnext 25262* | Extend a line with a missing point. Theorem 4.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝐴 − 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 〈“𝑋𝑌𝑍”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐴𝐵𝑐”〉) | ||
Theorem | tgfscgr 25263 | Congruence law for the general five segment configuration. Theorem 4.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝑋𝑌𝑍”〉 ∼ 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑇) = (𝐴 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑇) = (𝐵 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 − 𝑇) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | lncgr 25264 | Congruence rule for lines. Theorem 4.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝑋 − 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝐴) = (𝑌 − 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 − 𝐴) = (𝑍 − 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | lnid 25265 | Identity law for points on lines. Theorem 4.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 38. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑍) = (𝑋 − 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑌 − 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | tgidinside 25266 | Law for finding a point inside a segment. Theorem 4.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 38. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑍) = (𝑋 − 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑌 − 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnconn1lem1 25267 | Lemma for tgbtwnconn1 25270. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐷) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐹) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐻) = (𝐵 − 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 − 𝐽) = (𝐵 − 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = 𝐽) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnconn1lem2 25268 | Lemma for tgbtwnconn1 25270. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐷) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐹) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐻) = (𝐵 − 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 − 𝐽) = (𝐵 − 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐹) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnconn1lem3 25269 | Lemma for tgbtwnconn1 25270. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐽)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐷) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐹) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐻) = (𝐵 − 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 − 𝐽) = (𝐵 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnconn1 25270 | Connectivity law for betweenness. Theorem 5.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 39-41. In earlier presentations of Tarski's axioms, this theorem appeared as an additional axiom. It was derived from the other axioms by Gupta, 1965. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷) ∨ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnconn2 25271 | Another connectivity law for betweenness. Theorem 5.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷) ∨ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnconn3 25272 | Inner connectivity law for betweenness. Theorem 5.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶) ∨ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnconnln3 25273 | Derive colinearity from betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnconn22 25274 | Double connectivity law for betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnconnln1 25275 | Derive colinearity from betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐿𝐷) ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | tgbtwnconnln2 25276 | Derive colinearity from betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐿𝐷) ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
Syntax | cleg 25277 | Less-than relation for geometric congruences. |
class ≤G | ||
Definition | df-leg 25278* | Define the less-than relationship between geometric distance congruence classes. See legval 25279. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ ≤G = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {〈𝑒, 𝑓〉 ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑔) / 𝑑][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑓 = (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∧ 𝑒 = (𝑥𝑑𝑧)))}) | ||
Theorem | legval 25279* | Value of the less-than relationship. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = {〈𝑒, 𝑓〉 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑓 = (𝑥 − 𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∧ 𝑒 = (𝑥 − 𝑧)))}) | ||
Theorem | legov 25280* | Value of the less-than relationship. Definition 5.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑧 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝑧)))) | ||
Theorem | legov2 25281* | An equivalent definition of the less-than relationship. Definition 5.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝑥) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)))) | ||
Theorem | legid 25282 | Reflexivity of the less-than relationship. Proposition 5.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐴 − 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | btwnleg 25283 | Betweenness implies less-than relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐴 − 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | legtrd 25284 | Transitivity of the less-than relationship. Proposition 5.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐷) ≤ (𝐸 − 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐸 − 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | legtri3 25285 | Equality from the less-than relationship. Proposition 5.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐷) ≤ (𝐴 − 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | legtrid 25286 | Trichotomy law for the less-than relationship. Proposition 5.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ≤ (𝐴 − 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | leg0 25287 | Degenerated (zero-length) segments are minimal. Proposition 5.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | legeq 25288 | Deduce equality from "less than" null segments. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | legbtwn 25289 | Deduce betweenness from "less than" relation. Corresponds loosely to Proposition 6.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐴))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | tgcgrsub2 25290 | Removing identical parts from the end of a line segment preserves congruence. In this version the order of points is not known. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶) ∨ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹) ∨ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐸))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | ltgseg 25291* | The set 𝐸 denotes the possible values of the congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 𝐴 = (𝑥 − 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | ltgov 25292 | Strict "shorter than" geometric relation between segments. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − ) & ⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)))) | ||
Theorem | legov3 25293 | An equivalent definition of the less-than relationship, from the strict relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − ) & ⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷)))) | ||
Theorem | legso 25294 | The shorter-than relationship builds an order over pairs. Remark 5.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − ) & ⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → < Or 𝐸) | ||
Syntax | chlg 25295 | Function producing the relation "belong to the same half-line". |
class hlG | ||
Definition | df-hlg 25296* | Define the function producting the relation "belong to the same half-line" (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ hlG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑐 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ (𝑐(Itv‘𝑔)𝑏) ∨ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑐(Itv‘𝑔)𝑎))))})) | ||
Theorem | ishlg 25297 | Rays : Definition 6.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. With this definition, 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵 means that 𝐴 and 𝐵 are on the same ray with initial point 𝐶. This follows the same notation as Schwabhauser where rays are first defined as a relation. It is possible to recover the ray itself using e.g. ((𝐾‘𝐶) “ {𝐴}) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐴))))) | ||
Theorem | hlcomb 25298 | The half-line relation commutes. Theorem 6.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐵(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | hlcomd 25299 | The half-line relation commutes. Theorem 6.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐴) | ||
Theorem | hlne1 25300 | The half-line relation implies inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Feb-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |