P. 382 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Type

Label

Description

Statement

Theorem

en3lplem2VD 38101*

Virtual deduction proof of en3lplem2 8395. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))

Theorem

en3lpVD 38102

Virtual deduction proof of en3lp 8396. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)

21.30.7  Theorems proved using Virtual Deduction with mmj2 assistance

Theorem

simplbi2VD 38103

Virtual deduction proof of simplbi2 653. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

h1::	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
3:1,?: e0a 38020	⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜑)
qed:3,?: e0a 38020	⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑))

The proof of simplbi2 653 was automatically derived from it. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑))

Theorem

3ornot23VD 38104

Virtual deduction proof of 3ornot23 37736. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::

⊢ (   (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)   )
2::	⊢ (   (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)   )
3:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   ¬ 𝜑   )
4:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   ¬ 𝜓   )
5:3,4,?: e11 37934	⊢ (   (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   ¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)   )
6:2,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜒 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))   )
7:5,6,?: e12 37972	⊢ (   (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)   ▶   𝜒   )
8:7:	⊢ (   (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒)   )
qed:8:	⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒))

Theorem

orbi1rVD 38105

Virtual deduction proof of orbi1r 37737. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   )
2::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)    ▶   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)   )
3:2,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)    ▶   (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)   )
4:1,3,?: e12 37972	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)    ▶   (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)   )
5:4,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)    ▶   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))   )
7::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)    ▶   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)   )
8:7,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)    ▶   (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)   )
9:1,8,?: e12 37972	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)    ▶   (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)   )
10:9,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)    ▶   (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)   )
11:10:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑))   )
12:6,11,?: e11 37934	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))   )
qed:12:	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)))

Theorem

bitr3VD 38106

Virtual deduction proof of bitr3 341. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   )
2:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)   )
3::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)    ▶   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)   )
4:3,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)    ▶   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑)   )
5:2,4,?: e12 37972	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)    ▶   (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))   )
qed:6:	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))

Theorem

3orbi123VD 38107

Virtual deduction proof of 3orbi123 37738. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))   ▶   ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))   )
2:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   )
3:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))   ▶   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   )
4:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))   ▶   (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)   )
5:2,3,?: e11 37934	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))   ▶   ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃))   )
6:5,4,?: e11 37934	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))   ▶   (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜏) ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ 𝜂))   )
7:?:	⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏))
8:6,7,?: e10 37940	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))   ▶   ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ 𝜂))   )
9:?:	⊢ (((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ 𝜂) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂))
10:8,9,?: e10 37940	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))   ▶   ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂))   )
qed:10:	⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂)))

Theorem

sbc3orgVD 38108

Virtual deduction proof of sbc3orgOLD 37763. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   )
2:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))   )
3::	⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
32:3:	⊢ ∀𝑥(((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
33:1,32,?: e10 37940	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   [𝐴 / 𝑥](((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))   )
4:1,33,?: e11 37934	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))   )
5:2,4,?: e11 37934	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))   )
6:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓))   )
7:6,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   (([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))   )
8:5,7,?: e11 37934	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))   )
9:?:	⊢ ((([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))
10:8,9,?: e10 37940	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))   )
qed:10:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))

Theorem

19.21a3con13vVD 38109*

Virtual deduction proof of alrim3con13v 37764. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ▶   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   )
2::	⊢ (   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ,   (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)   ▶   (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)   )
3:2,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ,   (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)   ▶   𝜓   )
4:2,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ,   (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)   ▶   𝜑   )
5:2,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ,   (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)   ▶   𝜒   )
6:1,4,?: e12 37972	⊢ (   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ,   (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)   ▶   ∀𝑥𝜑   )
7:3,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ,   (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)   ▶   ∀𝑥𝜓   )
8:5,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ,   (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)   ▶   ∀𝑥𝜒   )
9:7,6,8,?: e222 37882	⊢ (   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ,   (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)   ▶   (∀𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜒)   )
10:9,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ,   (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)   )
11:10:in2	⊢ (   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))   )
qed:11:in1	⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))

Theorem

exbirVD 38110

Virtual deduction proof of exbir 37705. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ▶   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))   )
2::	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))   ,    (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)   )
3::	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))   ,    (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓), 𝜃   ▶   𝜃   )
5:1,2,?: e12 37972	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   )
6:3,5,?: e32 38006	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓), 𝜃   ▶   𝜒   )
7:6:	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜃 → 𝜒)   )
8:7:	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ▶   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜃 → 𝜒))   )
9:8,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))   ▶   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))   )
qed:9:	⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))

Theorem

exbiriVD 38111

Virtual deduction proof of exbiri 650. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

h1::	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
2::	⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜑   )
3::	⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜓   )
4::	⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜃   )
5:2,1,?: e10 37940	⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))   )
6:3,5,?: e21 37978	⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   )
7:4,6,?: e32 38006	⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜒   )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   (𝜃 → 𝜒)   )
9:8:	⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))   )
qed:9:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))

Theorem

rspsbc2VD 38112*

Virtual deduction proof of rspsbc2 37765. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   )
2::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   𝐶 ∈ 𝐷   ▶   𝐶 ∈ 𝐷   )
3::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   𝐶 ∈ 𝐷   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   )
4:1,3,?: e13 37996	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   𝐶 ∈ 𝐷   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   ▶   [𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   )
5:1,4,?: e13 37996	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   𝐶 ∈ 𝐷   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   ▶   ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
6:2,5,?: e23 38003	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   𝐶 ∈ 𝐷   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   ▶   [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   𝐶 ∈ 𝐷   ▶   (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)   )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))   )
qed:8:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)))

Theorem

3impexpVD 38113

Virtual deduction proof of 3impexp 1281. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)   ▶   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)   )
2::	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒))
3:1,2,?: e10 37940	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)   ▶   (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)   )
4:3,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)   ▶   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))   )
5:4,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)   ▶   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))   )
6:5:	⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
7::	⊢ (   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))   ▶   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))   )
8:7,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))   ▶   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))   )
9:8,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))   ▶   (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)   )
10:2,9,?: e01 37937	⊢ (   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))   ▶   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)   )
11:10:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
qed:6,11,?: e00 38016	⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))

Theorem

3impexpbicomVD 38114

Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicom 37706. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))   ▶   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))   )
2::	⊢ ((𝜃 ↔ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))
3:1,2,?: e10 37940	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))   ▶   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))   )
4:3,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))   ▶   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))   )
5:4:	⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))))
6::	⊢ (   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))   ▶   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))   )
7:6,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))   ▶   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))   )
8:7,2,?: e10 37940	⊢ (   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))   ▶   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))   )
9:8:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)))
qed:5,9,?: e00 38016	⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))))

Theorem

3impexpbicomiVD 38115

Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicomi 37707. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

h1::	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))
qed:1,?: e0a 38020	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

Theorem

sbcel1gvOLD 38116*

Class substitution into a membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) Obsolete as of 17-Aug-2018. Use sbcel1v 3462 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))

Theorem

sbcoreleleqVD 38117*

Virtual deduction proof of sbcoreleleq 37766. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   )
2:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   )
3:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)   )
4:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)   )
5:2,3,4,?: e111 37920	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 = 𝑦))   )
6:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 = 𝑦))   )
7:5,6: e11 37934	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))   )
qed:7:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴)))

Theorem

hbra2VD 38118*

Virtual deduction proof of nfra2 2930. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
2::	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
3:1,2,?: e00 38016	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
4:2:	⊢ ∀𝑦(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
5:4,?: e0a 38020	⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
qed:3,5,?: e00 38016	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)

Theorem

tratrbVD 38119*

Virtual deduction proof of tratrb 37767. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    ▶   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   )
2:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   Tr 𝐴   )
3:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    ▶   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
4:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   𝐵 ∈ 𝐴   )
5::	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   )
6:5,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝑦   )
7:5,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝐵   )
8:2,7,4,?: e121 37902	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )
9:2,6,8,?: e122 37899	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   )
10::	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥   ▶   𝐵 ∈ 𝑥   )
11:6,7,10,?: e223 37881	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)   )
12:11:	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   ▶   (𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥))   )
13::	⊢ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)
14:12,13,?: e20 37975	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   ▶   ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥   )
15::	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵   ▶   𝑥 = 𝐵   )
16:7,15,?: e23 38003	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝑥   )
17:6,16,?: e23 38003	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)   )
18:17:	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))   )
19::	⊢ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
20:18,19,?: e20 37975	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   ▶   ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐵   )
21:3,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
22:21,9,4,?: e121 37902	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   ▶   [𝑥 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
23:22,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   ▶   [𝐵 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
24:4,23,?: e12 37972	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵)   )
25:14,20,24,?: e222 37882	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝐵   )
26:25:	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)   )
27::	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
28:27,?: e0a 38020	⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑦(Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
29:28,26:	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    ▶   ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)   )
30::	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
31:30,?: e0a 38020	⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑥(Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
32:31,29:	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)   )
33:32,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   Tr 𝐵   )
qed:33:	⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵)

Theorem

al2imVD 38120

Virtual deduction proof of al2im 1732. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ▶   ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))   )
2:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ▶   (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒))   )
3::	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒))
4:2,3,?: e10 37940	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ▶   (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒))   )
qed:4:	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒)))

Theorem

syl5impVD 38121

Virtual deduction proof of syl5imp 37739. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))   ▶   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))   )
2:1,?: e1a 37873	⊢ (   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))   ▶   (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))   )
3::	⊢ (   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))   ,   (𝜃 → 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜃 → 𝜓)   )
4:3,2,?: e21 37978	⊢ (   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))   ,   (𝜃 → 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜃 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))   )
5:4,?: e2 37877	⊢ (   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))   ,   (𝜃 → 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))   )
6:5:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))   ▶   ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))   )
qed:6:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))

Theorem

idiVD 38122

Virtual deduction proof of idiALT 37704. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

h1::	⊢ 𝜑
qed:1,?: e0a 38020	⊢ 𝜑

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑

Theorem

ancomstVD 38123

Closed form of ancoms 468. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.

1::	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))
qed:1,?: e0a 38020	⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒))

The proof of ancomst 467 is derived automatically from it. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒))

Theorem

ssralv2VD 38124*

Quantification restricted to a subclass for two quantifiers. ssralv 3629 for two quantifiers. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ssralv2 37758 is ssralv2VD 38124 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ssralv2VD 38124.

1::	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   ▶   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   )
2::	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   )
3:1:	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   ▶   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   )
4:3,2:	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   )
5:4:	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑)   )
7::	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   )
8:7,6:	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   )
9:1:	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   ▶   𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷   )
10:9,8:	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑   )
11:10:	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑)   )
12::	⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → ∀𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷))
13::	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑)
14:12,13,11:	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑)   )
15:14:	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)   ,   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑   )
16:15:	⊢ (   (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)    ▶   (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑)   )
qed:16:	⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑))

Theorem

ordelordALTVD 38125

An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 36. This is an alternate proof of ordelord 5662 using the Axiom of Regularity indirectly through dford2 8400. dford2 is a weaker definition of ordinal number. Given the Axiom of Regularity, it need not be assumed that E Fr 𝐴 because this is inferred by the Axiom of Regularity. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ordelordALT 37768 is ordelordALTVD 38125 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ordelordALTVD 38125 using the tools program translate..without..overwriting.cmd and Metamath's minimize command.

1::	⊢ (   (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   Ord 𝐴   )
3:1:	⊢ (   (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   𝐵 ∈ 𝐴   )
4:2:	⊢ (   (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   Tr 𝐴   )
5:2:	⊢ (   (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)   )
6:4,3:	⊢ (   (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴   )
7:6,6,5:	⊢ (   (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)   )
8::	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
9:8:	⊢ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
10:9:	⊢ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
11:10:	⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
12:11:	⊢ ∀𝑥(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
13:12:	⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
14:13:	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
15:14,5:	⊢ (   (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
16:4,15,3:	⊢ (   (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   Tr 𝐵   )
17:16,7:	⊢ (   (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   Ord 𝐵   )
qed:17:	⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)

Theorem

equncomVD 38126

If a class equals the union of two other classes, then it equals the union of those two classes commuted. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncom 3720 is equncomVD 38126 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomVD 38126.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)   ▶   𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)   )
2::	⊢ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)
3:1,2:	⊢ (   𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)   ▶   𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)   )
4:3:	⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
5::	⊢ (   𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)   ▶   𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)   )
6:5,2:	⊢ (   𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)   ▶   𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)   )
7:6:	⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶))
8:4,7:	⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))

Theorem

equncomiVD 38127

Inference form of equncom 3720. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncomi 3721 is equncomiVD 38127 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomiVD 38127.

h1::	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)
qed:1:	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)

Theorem

sucidALTVD 38128

A set belongs to its successor. Alternate proof of sucid 5721. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sucidALT 38129 is sucidALTVD 38128 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sucidALTVD 38128. This proof illustrates that completeusersproof.cmd will generate a Metamath proof from any User's Proof which is "conventional" in the sense that no step is a virtual deduction, provided that all necessary unification theorems and transformation deductions are in set.mm. completeusersproof.cmd automatically converts such a conventional proof into a Virtual Deduction proof for which each step happens to be a 0-virtual hypothesis virtual deduction. The user does not need to search for reference theorem labels or deduction labels nor does he(she) need to use theorems and deductions which unify with reference theorems and deductions in set.mm. All that is necessary is that each theorem or deduction of the User's Proof unifies with some reference theorem or deduction in set.mm or is a semantic variation of some theorem or deduction which unifies with some reference theorem or deduction in set.mm. The definition of "semantic variation" has not been precisely defined. If it is obvious that a theorem or deduction has the same meaning as another theorem or deduction, then it is a semantic variation of the latter theorem or deduction. For example, step 4 of the User's Proof is a semantic variation of the definition (axiom) suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}), which unifies with df-suc 5646, a reference definition (axiom) in set.mm. Also, a theorem or deduction is said to be a semantic variation of another theorem or deduction if it is obvious upon cursory inspection that it has the same meaning as a weaker form of the latter theorem or deduction. For example, the deduction Ord 𝐴 infers ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) is a semantic variation of the theorem (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))), which unifies with the set.mm reference definition (axiom) dford2 8400.

h1::	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2:1:	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
3:2:	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ({𝐴} ∪ 𝐴)
4::	⊢ suc 𝐴 = ({𝐴} ∪ 𝐴)
qed:3,4:	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴

Theorem

sucidALT 38129

A set belongs to its successor. This proof was automatically derived from sucidALTVD 38128 using translate_without_overwriting.cmd and minimizing. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴

Theorem

sucidVD 38130

A set belongs to its successor. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sucid 5721 is sucidVD 38130 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sucidVD 38130.

h1::	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2:1:	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
3:2:	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
4::	⊢ suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
qed:3,4:	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴

Theorem

imbi12VD 38131

Implication form of imbi12i 339. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi12 335 is imbi12VD 38131 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from imbi12VD 38131.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   )
2::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ▶   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   )
3::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜑 → 𝜒)   ▶   (𝜑 → 𝜒)   )
4:1,3:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜑 → 𝜒)   ▶   (𝜓 → 𝜒)   )
5:2,4:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜑 → 𝜒)   ▶   (𝜓 → 𝜃)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ▶   ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃))   )
7::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜓 → 𝜃)   ▶   (𝜓 → 𝜃)   )
8:1,7:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜓 → 𝜃)   ▶   (𝜑 → 𝜃)   )
9:2,8:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜓 → 𝜃)   ▶   (𝜑 → 𝜒)   )
10:9:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ▶   ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))   )
11:6,10:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ▶   ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))   )
12:11:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃)))   )
qed:12:	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))))

Theorem

imbi13VD 38132

Join three logical equivalences to form equivalence of implications. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi13 37747 is imbi13VD 38132 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from imbi13VD 38132.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   )
2::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ▶   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   )
3::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)   ▶   (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)   )
4:2,3:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)   ▶   ((𝜒 → 𝜏) ↔ (𝜃 → 𝜂))   )
5:1,4:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)   ,   (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)   ▶   ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))   )
6:5:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ,   (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ▶   ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))))   )
7:6:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   ▶   ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))))   )
qed:7:	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))))))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))))))

Theorem

sbcim2gVD 38133

Distribution of class substitution over a left-nested implication. Similar to sbcimg 3444. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sbcim2g 37769 is sbcim2gVD 38133 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sbcim2gVD 38133.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   )
2::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))   ▶   [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))   )
3:1,2:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒))   )
4:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))   )
5:3,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))   )
6:5:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))   )
7::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))   )
8:4,7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒))   )
9:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)))   )
10:8,9:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))   ▶   [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))   )
11:10:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))   )
12:6,11:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))   )
qed:12:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))))

Theorem

sbcbiVD 38134

Implication form of sbcbiiOLD 37762. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sbcbi 37770 is sbcbiVD 38134 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sbcbiVD 38134.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   )
2::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ▶   ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   )
3:1,2:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ▶   [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)   )
4:1,3:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ,   ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)   )
5:4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓))   )
qed:5:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)))

Theorem

trsbcVD 38135*

Formula-building inference rule for class substitution, substituting a class variable for the setvar variable of the transitivity predicate. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. trsbc 37771 is trsbcVD 38135 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from trsbcVD 38135.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)   )
4:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)   )
5:1,2,3,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)))   )
6:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)))   )
7:5,6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)))   )
8::	⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
9:7,8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))   )
10::	⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
11:10:	⊢ ∀𝑥((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
12:1,11:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))   )
13:9,12:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))   )
14:13:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))   )
15:14:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   (∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))   )
16:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))   )
17:15,16:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))   )
18:17:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))   )
19:18:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   (∀𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))   )
20:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦(( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))   )
21:19,20:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦(( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))   )
22::	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
23:21,22:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦(( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ Tr 𝐴)   )
24::	⊢ (Tr 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
25:24:	⊢ ∀𝑥(Tr 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
26:1,25:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))   )
27:23,26:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 ↔ Tr 𝐴)   )
qed:27:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 ↔ Tr 𝐴))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 ↔ Tr 𝐴))

Theorem

truniALTVD 38136*

The union of a class of transitive sets is transitive. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. truniALT 37772 is truniALTVD 38136 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from truniALTVD 38136.

1::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥   )
2::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
4:2:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴   )
5:4:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   ▶   ∃𝑞(𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴)   )
6::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴)   )
7:6:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝑞   )
8:6:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑞 ∈ 𝐴   )
9:1,8:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   [𝑞 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥   )
10:8,9:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   Tr 𝑞   )
11:3,7,10:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑞   )
12:11,8:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴   )
13:12:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   ▶   ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   )
14:13:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   ▶   ∀𝑞((𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   )
15:14:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   ▶   (∃𝑞(𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   )
16:5,15:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴   )
17:16:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ▶   ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   )
18:17:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥    ▶   ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)   )
19:18:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ▶   Tr ∪ 𝐴   )
qed:19:	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∪ 𝐴)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∪ 𝐴)

Theorem

ee33VD 38137

Non-virtual deduction form of e33 37982. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ee33 37748 is ee33VD 38137 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ee33VD 38137.

h1::	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
h2::	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))
h3::	⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
4:1,3:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
5:4:	⊢ (𝜏 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
6:2,5:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))))
7:6:	⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))))
8:7:	⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
qed:8:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))

Theorem

trintALTVD 38138*

The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Virtual deduction proof of trintALT 38139. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. trintALT 38139 is trintALTVD 38138 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from trintALTVD 38138.

1::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   )
2::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
4:2:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴   )
5:4:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴)   ▶   ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴𝑦 ∈ 𝑞   )
6:5:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞)   )
7::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑞 ∈ 𝐴   )
8:7,6:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝑞   )
9:7,1:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   [𝑞 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥   )
10:7,9:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   Tr 𝑞   )
11:10,3,8:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑞   )
12:11:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞)   )
13:12:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴)   ▶   ∀𝑞(𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞)   )
14:13:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴)   ▶   ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴𝑧 ∈ 𝑞   )
15:3,14:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴   )
16:15:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ▶   ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ▶   ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴)   )
18:17:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥   ▶   Tr ∩ 𝐴   )
qed:18:	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩ 𝐴)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩ 𝐴)

Theorem

trintALT 38139*

The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Exercise 5(b) of [Enderton] p. 73. trintALT 38139 is an alternate proof of trint 4696. trintALT 38139 is trintALTVD 38138 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from trintALTVD 38138 using the tools program translate..without..overwriting.cmd and Metamath's minimize command. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩ 𝐴)

Theorem

undif3VD 38140

The first equality of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Virtual deduction proof of undif3 3847. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. undif3 3847 is undif3VD 38140 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from undif3VD 38140.

1::	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)))
2::	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
3:2:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
4:1,3:	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
5::	⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   )
6:5:	⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)   )
7:5:	⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   )
8:6,7:	⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))   )
9:8:	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
10::	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   )
11:10:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝐵   )
12:10:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶    )
13:11:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)   )
14:12:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   )
15:13,14:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))   )
16:15:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
17:9,16:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
18::	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   )
19:18:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   )
20:18:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶    )
21:18:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))   )
22:21:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
23::	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   )
24:23:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   )
25:24:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))   )
26:25:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
27:10:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))   )
28:27:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
29::	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   )
30:29:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   )
31:30:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))   )
32:31:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
33:22,26:	⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
34:28,32:	⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
35:33,34:	⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
36::	⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
37:36,35:	⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
38:17,37:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
39::	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
40:39:	⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
41::	⊢ (¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
42:40,41:	⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
43::	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ))
44:43,42:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
45::	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
46:45,44:	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
47:4,38:	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
48:46,47:	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
49:48:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
qed:49:	⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴))

Theorem

sbcssgVD 38141

Virtual deduction proof of sbcssg 4035. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sbcssg 4035 is sbcssgVD 38141 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sbcssgVD 38141.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)   )
4:2,3:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷 ))   )
5:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))   )
6:4,5:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))   )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))   )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   (∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )   )
9:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))   )
10:8,9:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )   )
11::	⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))
110:11:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))
12:1,110:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))   )
13:10,12:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))   )
14::	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷 ↔ ∀ 𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
15:13,14:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)   )
qed:15:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋ 𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))

Theorem

csbingVD 38142

Virtual deduction proof of csbingOLD 38076. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbingOLD 38076 is csbingVD 38142 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbingVD 38142.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   )
2::	⊢ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) }
20:2:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)}
30:1,20:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)}   )
3:1,30:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)}   )
4:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)}   )
5:3,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)}   )
6:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
7:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)   )
8:6,7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )   )
9:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))   )
10:9,8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))   )
11:10:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))   )
12:11:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)}   )
13:5,12:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)}   )
14::	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) = { 𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)}
15:13,14:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)   )
qed:15:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))

Theorem

onfrALTlem5VD 38143*

Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem5 37778. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALTlem5 37778 is onfrALTlem5VD 38143 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTlem5VD 38143.

1::	⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
2:1:	⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∈ V
3:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
4:3:	⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
5::	⊢ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥 ) = ∅)
6:4,5:	⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)
7:2:	⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
8::	⊢ (𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
9:8:	⊢ ∀𝑏(𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
10:2,9:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
11:7,10:	⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅)
12:6,11:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ( 𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)
13:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥 ) ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥))
14:12,13:	⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅))
15:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅))
16:15,14:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅))
17:2:	⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ( ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 ∩ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦)
18:2:	⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 = (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
19:2:	⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦 = 𝑦
20:18,19:	⊢ (⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 ∩ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦) = ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
21:17,20:	⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = (( 𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
22:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌ ∅)
23:2:	⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌∅ = ∅
24:21,23:	⊢ (⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌∅ ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
25:22,24:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
26:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥))
27:25,26:	⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ [ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (( 𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
28:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
29:27,28:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
30:29:	⊢ ∀𝑦([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
31:30:	⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
32::	⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ))
33:31,32:	⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
34:2:	⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ( 𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
35:33,34:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)
36::	⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
37:36:	⊢ ∀𝑏(∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
38:2,37:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
39:35,38:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
40:16,39:	⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
41:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
qed:40,41:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥 )((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))

Theorem

onfrALTlem4VD 38144*

Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem4 37779. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALTlem4 37779 is onfrALTlem4VD 38144 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTlem4VD 38144.

1::	⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
2:1:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ↔ ⦋ 𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌∅)
3:1:	⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌ 𝑎 ∩ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥)
4:1:	⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑎 = 𝑎
5:1:	⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥 = 𝑦
6:4,5:	⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑎 ∩ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥) = ( 𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)
7:3,6:	⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)
8:1:	⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌∅ = ∅
9:7,8:	⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌ ∅ ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
10:2,9:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
11:1:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑎)
12:11,10:	⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]( 𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
13:1:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅))
qed:13,12:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))

Theorem

onfrALTlem3VD 38145*

Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem3 37780. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALTlem3 37780 is onfrALTlem3VD 38145 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTlem3VD 38145.

1::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   )
2::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝑎   )
4:1:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   𝑎 ⊆ On   )
5:3,4:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ On   )
6:5:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   Ord 𝑥   )
7:6:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶    E We 𝑥   )
8::	⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑥
9:7,8:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶    E We (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)   )
10:9:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶    E Fr (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)   )
11:10:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∀𝑏((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
12::	⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
13:12,8:	⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∈ V
14:13,11:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
15::	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)( (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
16:14,15:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ( 𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
17::	⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
18:2:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅   )
19:18:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅   )
20:17,19:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)   )
qed:16,20:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅   )

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )

Theorem

simplbi2comtVD 38146

Virtual deduction proof of simplbi2comt 654. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. simplbi2comt 654 is simplbi2comtVD 38146 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from simplbi2comtVD 38146.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ ( 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))   ▶   ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ) → 𝜑)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))   ▶   (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑))   )
4:3:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))   ▶   (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))   )
qed:4:	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜑)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜑)))

Theorem

onfrALTlem2VD 38147*

Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem2 37782. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALTlem2 37782 is onfrALTlem2VD 38147 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTlem2VD 38147.

1::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑎   )
4::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   )
5::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝑎   )
7:4:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   𝑎 ⊆ On   )
8:6,7:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ On   )
9:8:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   Ord 𝑥   )
10:9:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   Tr 𝑥   )
11:1:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)   )
12:11:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝑥   )
13:2:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
14:10,12,13:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑥   )
15:3,14:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)   )
16:13,15:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) → 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦))   )
18:17:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) → 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦))   )
19:18:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)   )
20::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
21:20:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )
22:19,21:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )
23:20:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)   )
24:23:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝑎   )
25:22,24:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
26:25:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))   )
27:26:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∀𝑦((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥 ) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))   )
28:27:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥 ) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))   )
29::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅   )
30:29:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
31:28,30:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
qed:31:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )

Theorem

onfrALTlem1VD 38148*

Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem1 37784. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALTlem1 37784 is onfrALTlem1VD 38148 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTlem1VD 38148.

1::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)    )
4::	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
5:4:	⊢ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
6:5:	⊢ (∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
7:3,6:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
8::	⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
qed:7,8:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )

Theorem

onfrALTVD 38149

Virtual deduction proof of onfrALT 37785. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALT 37785 is onfrALTVD 38149 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTVD 38149.

1::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )
2::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )
3:1:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝑎   ▶    (¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
4:2:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝑎   ▶    ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
5::	⊢ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ∨ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
6:5,4,3:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝑎   ▶    ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )
7:6:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
8:7:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
9:8:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   (∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
10::	⊢ (𝑎 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝑎)
11:9,10:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
12::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   )
13:12:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   𝑎 ≠ ∅   )
14:13,11:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )
15:14:	⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
16:15:	⊢ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
qed:16:	⊢ E Fr On

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ E Fr On

Theorem

csbeq2gVD 38150

Virtual deduction proof of csbeq2gOLD 37786. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbeq2gOLD 37786 is csbeq2gVD 38150 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbeq2gVD 38150.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥] 𝐵 = 𝐶)   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
4:2,3:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥 ⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
qed:4:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))

Theorem

csbsngVD 38151

Virtual deduction proof of csbsng 4190. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbsng 4190 is csbsngVD 38151 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbsngVD 38151.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = 𝑦   )
4:3:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
5:2,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
8:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵} = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}   )
9:7,8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
10::	⊢ {𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}
11:10:	⊢ ∀𝑥{𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}
12:1,11:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = ⦋ 𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}   )
13:9,12:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = { 𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
14::	⊢ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}
15:13,14:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = { ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
qed:15:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋ 𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})

Theorem

csbxpgVD 38152

Virtual deduction proof of csbxpgOLD 38075. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbxpgOLD 38075 is csbxpgVD 38152 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbxpgVD 38152.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 = 𝑤   )
4:3:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
5:2,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
6:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
7:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = 𝑦   )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
9:6,8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
10:5,9:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))   )
11:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))   )
12:10,11:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))   )
13:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤   ,    𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩)   )
14:12,13:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤    ,   𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
15:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤    ,   𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))   )
16:14,15:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤    ,   𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
17:16:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
18:17:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
19:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))   )
20:18,19:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
21:20:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑤([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦( 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
22:21:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦( 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
23:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃𝑦( 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))   )
24:22,23:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃𝑦( 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
25:24:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃ 𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
26:25:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃ 𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦( 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}    )
27:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃ 𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥] ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}   )
28:26,27:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃ 𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦( 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}    )
29::	⊢ {⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
30::	⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)}
31:29,30:	⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
32:31:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
33:1,32:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}   )
34:28,33:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}   )
35::	⊢ {⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
36::	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = { ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)}
37:35,36:	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
38:34,37:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
qed:38:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))

Theorem

csbresgVD 38153

Virtual deduction proof of csbresgOLD 38077. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbresgOLD 38077 is csbresgVD 38153 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbresgVD 38153.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌V = V   )
3:2:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌V) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V)   )
4:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌V)   )
5:3,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V)) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V))   )
7:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V)) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V))   )
8:6,7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V)) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V))   )
9::	⊢ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V))
10:9:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V))
11:1,10:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V))   )
12:8,11:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V))   )
13::	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V))
14:12,13:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
qed:14:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))

Theorem

csbrngVD 38154

Virtual deduction proof of csbrngOLD 38078. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbrngOLD 38078 is csbrngVD 38154 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbrngVD 38154.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩   )
4:3:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
5:2,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑤([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤   ,    𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤   ,    𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
8:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤   ,    𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵)   )
9:7,8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤    ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
10:9:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤 ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
11:10:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨ 𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
12:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤 ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵}   )
13:11,12:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤 ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
14::	⊢ ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵}
15:14:	⊢ ∀𝑥ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵}
16:1,15:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵}   )
17:13,16:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
18::	⊢ ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤    ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}
19:17,18:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋ 𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵   )
qed:19:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)

Theorem

csbima12gALTVD 38155

Virtual deduction proof of csbima12gALTOLD 38079. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbima12gALTOLD 38079 is csbima12gALTVD 38155 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbima12gALTVD 38155.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶    ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
4:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶    ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)   )
5:3,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶    ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
6::	⊢ (𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
7:6:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
8:1,7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ⦋ 𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)   )
9:5,8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
10::	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) = ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
11:9,10:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
qed:11:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋ 𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))

Theorem

csbunigVD 38156

Virtual deduction proof of csbunigOLD 38073. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbunigOLD 38073 is csbunigVD 38156 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbunigVD 38156.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
4:2,3:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))   )
5:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))   )
6:4,5:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))   )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))   )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))   )
9:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))   )
10:8,9:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))   )
11:10:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))   )
12:11:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)}   )
13:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}    )
14:12,13:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)}   )
15::	⊢ ∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
16:15:	⊢ ∀𝑥∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
17:1,16:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   [𝐴 / 𝑥]∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}   )
18:1,17:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}   )
19:14,18:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)}   )
20::	⊢ ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)}
21:19,20:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵   )
qed:21:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)

Theorem

csbfv12gALTVD 38157

Virtual deduction proof of csbfv12gALTOLD 38074. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbfv12gALTOLD 38074 is csbfv12gALTVD 38157 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbfv12gALTVD 38157.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦} = { 𝑦}   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵 }) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵})   )
4:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = { ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
5:4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵}) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})   )
6:3,5:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵 }) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})   )
7:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ { 𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦})   )
8:6,2:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ { 𝐵}) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦})   )
9:7,8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ { 𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦})    )
10:9:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦})   )
11:10:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
12:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
13:11,12:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦 }}   )
14:13:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ( 𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
15:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ ( 𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
16:14,15:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ ( 𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
17::	⊢ (𝐹‘𝐵) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}}
18:17:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐹‘𝐵) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵 }) = {𝑦}}
19:1,18:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
20:16,19:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
21::	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}}
22:20,21:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
qed:22:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))

Theorem

con5VD 38158

Virtual deduction proof of con5 37749. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. con5 37749 is con5VD 38158 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from con5VD 38158.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓 )   )
4::	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
5:3,4:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
qed:5:	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

Theorem

relopabVD 38159

Virtual deduction proof of relopab 5169. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. relopab 5169 is relopabVD 38159 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from relopabVD 38159.

1::	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑣   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ▶   ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑣 ⟩   )
3::	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑢   )
4:3:	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑣⟩ = ⟨ 𝑢, 𝑣⟩   )
5:2,4:	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ = ⟨ 𝑢, 𝑣⟩   )
6:5:	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦 ⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)   )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,    𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))   )
8:7:	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦 ⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)))
9:8:	⊢ (∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑣(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)))
90::	⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
91:90:	⊢ (∃𝑣𝑣 = 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣)
92::	⊢ ∃𝑣𝑣 = 𝑦
10:91,92:	⊢ ∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣
11:9,10:	⊢ ∃𝑣(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
12:11:	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
13::	⊢ (∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩) → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
14:12,13:	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
15:14:	⊢ (∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑢(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦 ⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
150::	⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑢)
151:150:	⊢ (∃𝑢𝑢 = 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢)
152::	⊢ ∃𝑢𝑢 = 𝑥
16:151,152:	⊢ ∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢
17:15,16:	⊢ ∃𝑢(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨ 𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
18:17:	⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨ 𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
19:18:	⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑦∃𝑢 ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
20::	⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
21:19,20:	⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
22:21:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑥 ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
23::	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
24:22,23:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢 ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
25:24:	⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩}
26::	⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
27::	⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
28:26,27:	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)
29:28:	⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦 ⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
30:29:	⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
31:30:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
32:31:	⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩} = { 𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))}
320:25,32:	⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩}
33::	⊢ 𝑢 ∈ V
34::	⊢ 𝑣 ∈ V
35:33,34:	⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)
36:35:	⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣 ⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
37:36:	⊢ (∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
38:37:	⊢ (∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ ↔ ∃𝑢 ∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
39:38:	⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩} = { 𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V))}
40:320,39:	⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V))}
41::	⊢ {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V )} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)) }
42::	⊢ {⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V )} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)) }
43:40,41,42:	⊢ {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V )} ⊆ {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)}
44::	⊢ {⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V )} = (V × V)
45:43,44:	⊢ {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V )} ⊆ (V × V)
46:28:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))
47:46:	⊢ {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)}
48:45,47:	⊢ {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ (V × V)
qed:48:	⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 9-Jul-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Theorem

19.41rgVD 38160

Virtual deduction proof of 19.41rg 37787. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. 19.41rg 37787 is 19.41rgVD 38160 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from 19.41rgVD 38160. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
2:1:	⊢ ((𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
3:2:	⊢ ∀𝑥((𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
4:3:	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
5::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   )
6:4,5:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))   )
7::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ,   ∀𝑥𝜓   ▶    ∀𝑥𝜓   )
8:6,7:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ,   ∀𝑥𝜓   ▶    ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))   )
9:8:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ,   ∀𝑥𝜓   ▶    (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))   )
10:9:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   (∀𝑥𝜓 → (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))   )
11:5:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   (𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥𝜓)   )
12:10,11:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   (𝜓 → ( ∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))   )
13:12:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   (∃𝑥𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))   )
14:13:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   ((∃𝑥 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))   )
qed:14:	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))

⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))

Theorem

2pm13.193VD 38161

Virtual deduction proof of 2pm13.193 37789. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. 2pm13.193 37789 is 2pm13.193VD 38161 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from 2pm13.193VD 38161. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑢   )
4:1:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑   )
5:3,4:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢)   )
7:6:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑   )
8:2:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑣   )
9:7,8:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
10:9:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
11:10:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   𝜑   )
12:2,11:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   )
13:12:	⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
14::	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   (( 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   )
15:14:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
16:15:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑣   )
17:14:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   𝜑    )
18:16,17:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
19:18:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   ([ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
20:15:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑢   )
21:19:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑   )
22:20,21:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   ([ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢)   )
23:22:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   ([ 𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢)   )
24:23:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑   )
25:15,24:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   (( 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   )
26:25:	⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
qed:13,26:	⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))

⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))

Theorem

hbimpgVD 38162

Virtual deduction proof of hbimpg 37791. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbimpg 37791 is hbimpgVD 38162 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from hbimpgVD 38162. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   )
3::	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ¬ 𝜑   )
4:2:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   ∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑)   )
5:4:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑)   )
6:3,5:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑   )
7::	⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
8:7:	⊢ (∀𝑥¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
9:6,8:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
10:9:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))   )
11::	⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
12:11:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
13:1:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   )
14:13:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   )
15:14,12:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))   )
16:10,15:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))   )
17::	⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
18:16,17:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))   )
19::	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥( 𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
20::	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥( 𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
21:19,20:	⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥(∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)))
22:21,18:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))   )
qed:22:	⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))

⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))

Theorem

hbalgVD 38163

Virtual deduction proof of hbalg 37792. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbalg 37792 is hbalgVD 38163 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from hbalgVD 38163. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   (∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑)   )
3::	⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)
4:2,3:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   (∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)   )
5::	⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦∀𝑦( 𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
6:5,4:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦(∀ 𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)   )
qed:6:	⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦(∀𝑦 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑))

⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦(∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑))

Theorem

hbexgVD 38164

Virtual deduction proof of hbexg 37793. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbexg 37793 is hbexgVD 38164 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from hbexgVD 38164. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦 ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   )
4:3:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑)   )
5::	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
6::	⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦 ∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
7:5:	⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
8:5,6,7:	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦 ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
9:8,4:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦 ∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑)   )
10:9:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∀𝑦(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑)   )
11:10:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦 (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑)   )
12:11:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦 (∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)   )
13:12:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   (∀ 𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)   )
14::	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥 ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
15:13,14:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 (∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)   )
16:15:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 (¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   (¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)   )
18::	⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)
19:17,18:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   (∃ 𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)   )
20:18:	⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)
21:19,20:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   (∃ 𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)   )
22:8,21:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)   )
23:14,22:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)   )
qed:23:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)   )

⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑))

Theorem

ax6e2eqVD 38165*

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 37806) completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2eq 37794 is ax6e2eqVD 38165 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2eqVD 38165. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   )
2::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑢   )
3:1:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑦   )
4:2,3:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑢   )
5:2,4:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢))   )
7:6:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)))
8:7:	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)))
9::	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
10:8,9:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)))
11:1,10:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢))   )
12:11:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   (∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑥 (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢))   )
13::	⊢ ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢
14:13,12:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢 )   )
140:14:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) )
141:140:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢))
15:1,141:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   )
16:1,15:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   )
18:17:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   )
19::	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   𝑢 = 𝑣   )
20::	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   )
21:20:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑢    )
22:19,21:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑣    )
23:20:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑢    )
24:22,23:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
25:24:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → ( 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
26:25:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   ∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
27:26:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
28:27:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   ∀𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
29:28:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
30:29:	⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢 ) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
31:18,30:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦 (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
qed:31:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦( 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))

⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))

Theorem

ax6e2ndVD 38166*

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 37806) completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2nd 37795 is ax6e2ndVD 38166 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2ndVD 38166. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ ∃𝑦𝑦 = 𝑣
2::	⊢ 𝑢 ∈ V
3:1,2:	⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑦𝑦 = 𝑣)
4:3:	⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
5::	⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢)
6:5:	⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ (∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
7:6:	⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑦 (∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
8:4,7:	⊢ ∃𝑦(∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
9::	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑧 = 𝑣)
10::	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑧𝑦 = 𝑣)
11::	⊢ (   𝑧 = 𝑦   ▶   𝑧 = 𝑦   )
12:11:	⊢ (   𝑧 = 𝑦   ▶   (𝑧 = 𝑣 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
120:11:	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑣 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
13:9,10,120:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
14::	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   )
15:14,13:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
16:15:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
17:16:	⊢ (∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
18::	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
19:17,18:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀ 𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
20:14,19:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
21:20:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
22:21:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
23:22:	⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦((∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
24::	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
25:23,24:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
26:14,25:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑦((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
27:26:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   (∃𝑦(∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
28:8,27:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
29:28:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
qed:29:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))

⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))

Theorem

ax6e2ndeqVD 38167*

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 37806) completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2eq 37794 is ax6e2ndeqVD 38167 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2ndeqVD 38167. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   )
2::	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   ▶   ( 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑢   )
4:1,3:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   ▶   𝑥 ≠ 𝑣   )
5:2:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑣   )
6:4,5:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   ▶   𝑥 ≠ 𝑦   )
7::	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
8:7:	⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
9::	⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦)
10:8,9:	⊢ (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
11:6,10:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   ▶    ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   )
12:11:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
13:12:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   ∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
14:13:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
15::	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
19:15:	⊢ (∃𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
20:14,19:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
21:20:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   ∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
22:21:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
23::	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃ 𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
24:22,23:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
25::	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
26:25:	⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
260::	⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
27:260:	⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
270:26,27:	⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
28::	⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
29:270,28:	⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
30:24,29:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
31:30:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣))   )
32:31:	⊢ (𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
33::	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   𝑢 = 𝑣   )
34:33:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)   )
35:34:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣))   )
36:35:	⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
37::	⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)
38:32,36,37:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣))
39::	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦 (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
40::	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
41:40:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃ 𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
42::	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
43:39,41,42:	⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣 ))
44:40,43:	⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥 ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
qed:38,44:	⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))

⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))

Theorem

2sb5ndVD 38168*

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 37806) completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the Metamath Proof Assistant. 2sb5nd 37797 is 2sb5ndVD 38168 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from 2sb5ndVD 38168. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Apr-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
2:1:	⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
3::	⊢ ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
4:3:	⊢ [𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
5:4:	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑢 / 𝑥] ∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
6::	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   )
7::	⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
8:7:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥)
9:6,8:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ¬ ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   )
10:9:	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥]∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀ 𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
11:5,10:	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
12:11:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
13::	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
14::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   )
15:14:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   (∀𝑥[𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   )
16:13,15:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦 ]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   )
17:16:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦] 𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
19:12,17:	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
20:19:	⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
21:2,20:	⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
22:21:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
23:13:	⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [ 𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
24:22,23:	⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [ 𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
240:24:	⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ( ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
241::	⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ( ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
242:241,240:	⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [ 𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
243::	⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ( [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))) ↔ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))))
25:242,243:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ([ 𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
26::	⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
qed:25,26:	⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))

⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))

Theorem

2uasbanhVD 38169*

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 37806) completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the Metamath Proof Assistant. 2uasbanh 37798 is 2uasbanhVD 38169 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from 2uasbanhVD 38169. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-May-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

h1::	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
100:1:	⊢ (𝜒 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
2:100:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))   )
3:2:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   )
4:3:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣 )   )
5:4:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)    )
6:5:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))   )
7:3,6:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑   )
8:2:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)   )
9:5:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))   )
10:8,9:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓   )
101::	⊢ ([𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
102:101:	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ [𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
103::	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦 ]𝜓) ↔ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
104:102,103:	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
11:7,10,104:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)   )
110:5:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))   )
12:11,110:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))   )
120:12:	⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣 ) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
13:1,120:	⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
14::	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))   )
15:14:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
16:14:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   𝜑   )
18:15,17:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   )
19:18:	⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 )) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
20:19:	⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
21:20:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
22:16:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   𝜓   )
23:15,22:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)   )
24:23:	⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 )) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
25:24:	⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
26:25:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
27:21,26:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦( (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
qed:13,27:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦( (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))

⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))

Theorem

e2ebindVD 38170

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 37806) completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the Metamath Proof Assistant. e2ebind 37800 is e2ebindVD 38170 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from e2ebindVD 38170.

1::	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
2:1:	⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
3:2:	⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜑 ))
4::	⊢ (   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   ▶   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   )
5:3,4:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   ▶   (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝜑)   )
6::	⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥)
7:5,6:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   ▶   ∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜑)   )
8:7:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   ▶   (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑)   )
9::	⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)
10:8,9:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   ▶   (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)   )
11::	⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∃𝑦𝜑)
12:11:	⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑)
13:10,12:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑)   )
14:13:	⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃ 𝑦𝜑))
15::	⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
qed:14,15:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃ 𝑦𝜑))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 27-Nov-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑))

21.30.8  Virtual Deduction transcriptions of textbook proofs

Theorem

sb5ALTVD 38171*

The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Unit 20 Excercise 3.a., which is sb5 2418, found in the "Answers to Starred Exercises" on page 457 of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth Edition (2008), by Virginia Klenk. The same proof may also be interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sb5ALT 37752 is sb5ALTVD 38171 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sb5ALTVD 38171.

1::	⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
2::	⊢ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑦
3:1,2:	⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
4:3:	⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   )
5:4:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )
6::	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
7::	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
8:7:	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   𝜑   )
9:7:	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑦   )
10:8,9:	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
101::	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
11:101,10:	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
12:5,11:	⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )) ∧ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
qed:12:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))

Theorem

vk15.4jVD 38172

The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Unit 15 Excercise 4.f. found in the "Answers to Starred Exercises" on page 442 of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth Edition (2008), by Virginia Klenk. The same proof may also be interpreted to be a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. vk15.4j 37755 is vk15.4jVD 38172 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from vk15.4jVD 38172. Step numbers greater than 25 are additional steps necessary for the sequent calculus proof not contained in the Fitch-style proof. Otherwise, step i of the User's Proof corresponds to step i of the Fitch-style proof.

h1::	⊢ ¬ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
h2::	⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏 ))
h3::	⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑)
4::	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   )
5:4:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ∀𝑥𝜃   )
6:3:	⊢ ∃𝑥(𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)
7::	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   )
8:7:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   𝜏   )
9:7:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   ¬ 𝜑   )
10:5:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   𝜃   )
11:10,8:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)   )
12:11:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)   )
13:12:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)   )
14:2,13:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒   )
140::	⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 )
141:140:	⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃)
142::	⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ∀𝑥∀𝑥𝜒)
143:142:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜒 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝜒 )
144:6,14,141,143:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒    )
15:1:	⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
16:9:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑   )
161::	⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 )
162:6,16,141,161:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑    )
17:162:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑   )
18:15,17:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ¬ ∃𝑥( 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)   )
19:18:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒)   )
20:144:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ∃𝑥¬ 𝜒    )
21::	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   ¬ 𝜒   ▶   ¬ 𝜒   )
22:19:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   (𝜓 → 𝜒 )   )
23:21,22:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   ¬ 𝜒   ▶   ¬ 𝜓   )
24:23:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   ¬ 𝜒   ▶   ∃ 𝑥¬ 𝜓   )
240::	⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜓 )
241:20,24,141,240:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ∃𝑥¬ 𝜓    )
25:241:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓    )
qed:25:	⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ¬ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)

Theorem

notnotrALTVD 38173

The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Theorem 5 of Section 14 of [Margaris] p. 59 (which is notnotr 124). The same proof may also be interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. notnotrALT 37756 is notnotrALTVD 38173 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from notnotrALTVD 38173. Step i of the User's Proof corresponds to step i of the Fitch-style proof.

1::	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   )
2::	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑))
3:1:	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑)   )
4::	⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑))
5:3:	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)   )
6:5,1:	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜑   )
qed:6:	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

Theorem

con3ALTVD 38174

The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Theorem 7 of Section 14 of [Margaris] p. 60 ( which is con3 148). The same proof may also be interpreted to be a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. con3ALT2 37757 is con3ALTVD 38174 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from con3ALTVD 38174. Step i of the User's Proof corresponds to step i of the Fitch-style proof.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
2::	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   )
3::	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
4:2:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜑   )
5:1,4:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )
6::	⊢ (𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
7:6,5:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ¬ ¬ 𝜓   )
8:7:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓 )   )
9::	⊢ ((¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
10:8:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑)   )
qed:10:	⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))

21.30.9  Theorems proved using conjunction-form Virtual Deduction

Theorem

elpwgdedVD 38175

Membership in a power class. Theorem 86 of [Suppes] p. 47. Derived from elpwg 4116. In form of VD deduction with 𝜑 and 𝜓 as variable virtual hypothesis collections based on Mario Carneiro's metavariable concept. elpwgded 37801 is elpwgdedVD 38175 using conventional notation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝐴 ∈ V   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   )    ⇒   ⊢ (   (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   )   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵   )

Theorem

sspwimp 38176

If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. sspwimp 38176, using conventional notation, was translated from virtual deduction form, sspwimpVD 38177, using a translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Theorem

sspwimpVD 38177

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 37806) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed manually, but has the potential to be completed automatically by a tools program which would invoke Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sspwimp 38176 is sspwimpVD 38177 without virtual deductions and was derived from sspwimpVD 38177. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   )
2::	⊢ (    .............. 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )
3:2:	⊢ (    .............. 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴   )
4:3,1:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵   )
5::	⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
6:4,5:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵    )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)    )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
9:8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵   )
qed:9:	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Theorem

sspwimpcf 38178

If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. sspwimpcf 38178, using conventional notation, was translated from its virtual deduction form, sspwimpcfVD 38179, using a translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Theorem

sspwimpcfVD 38179

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 37806) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed automatically by a tools program which would invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sspwimpcf 38178 is sspwimpcfVD 38179 without virtual deductions and was derived from sspwimpcfVD 38179. The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   )
2::	⊢ (    ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )
3:2:	⊢ (    ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴   )
4:3,1:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵   )
5::	⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
6:4,5:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵    )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)    )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
9:8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵   )
qed:9:	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Theorem

suctrALTcf 38180

The sucessor of a transitive class is transitive. suctrALTcf 38180, using conventional notation, was translated from virtual deduction form, suctrALTcfVD 38181, using a translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Theorem

suctrALTcfVD 38181

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 37806) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. The conjunction-form version of completeusersproof.cmd. It allows the User to avoid superflous virtual hypotheses. This proof was completed automatically by a tools program which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. suctrALTcf 38180 is suctrALTcfVD 38181 without virtual deductions and was derived automatically from suctrALTcfVD 38181. The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr 𝐴   )
2::	⊢ (   ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
4::	⊢ (   ................................... ....... 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )
5:1,3,4:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
6::	⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
7:5,6:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
8:7:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)    )   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
9::	⊢ (   ................................... ...... 𝑦 = 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 = 𝐴   )
10:3,9:	⊢ (   ........ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
11:10,6:	⊢ (   ........ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
12:11:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
13:2:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
14:13:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)   )
15:8,12,14:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)    )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
16:15:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
18:17:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr suc 𝐴   )
qed:18:	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

21.30.10  Theorems with a VD proof in conventional notation derived from a VD proof

Theorem

suctrALT3 38182

The successor of a transitive class is transitive. suctrALT3 38182 is the completed proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctralt3vd.html. It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from the VD proof exists. See wvd1 37806 for a description of Virtual Deduction. Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 19 used jaoded 37803). Unification deductions employ Mario Carneiro's metavariable concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a unification theorem (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 24 used dftr2 4682) . (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Theorem

sspwimpALT 38183

If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. sspwimpALT 38183 is the completed proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sspwimpaltvd.html. It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from the VD proof exists. See wvd1 37806 for a description of Virtual Deduction. Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 9 used elpwgded 37801). Unification deductions employ Mario Carneiro's metavariable concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a unification theorem (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 5 used elpwi 4117). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Theorem

unisnALT 38184

A set equals the union of its singleton. Theorem 8.2 of [Quine] p. 53. The User manually input on a mmj2 Proof Worksheet, without labels, all steps of unisnALT 38184 except 1, 11, 15, 21, and 30. With execution of the mmj2 unification command, mmj2 could find labels for all steps except for 2, 12, 16, 22, and 31 (and the then non-existing steps 1, 11, 15, 21, and 30) . mmj2 could not find reference theorems for those five steps because the hypothesis field of each of these steps was empty and none of those steps unifies with a theorem in set.mm. Each of these five steps is a semantic variation of a theorem in set.mm and is 2-step provable. mmj2 does not have the ability to automatically generate the semantic variation in set.mm of a theorem in a mmj2 Proof Worksheet unless the theorem in the Proof Worksheet is labeled with a 1-hypothesis deduction whose hypothesis is a theorem in set.mm which unifies with the theorem in the Proof Worksheet. The stepprover.c program, which invokes mmj2, has this capability. stepprover.c automatically generated steps 1, 11, 15, 21, and 30, labeled all steps, and generated the RPN proof of unisnALT 38184. Roughly speaking, stepprover.c added to the Proof Worksheet a labeled duplicate step of each non-unifying theorem for each label in a text file, labels.txt, containing a list of labels provided by the User. Upon mmj2 unification, stepprover.c identified a label for each of the five theorems which 2-step proves it. For unisnALT 38184, the label list is a list of all 1-hypothesis propositional calculus deductions in set.mm. stepproverp.c is the same as stepprover.c except that it intermittently pauses during execution, allowing the User to observe the changes to a text file caused by the execution of particular statements of the program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 19-Aug-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ {𝐴} = 𝐴

21.30.11  Theorems with a proof in conventional notation derived from a VD proof

Theorems with a proof in conventional notation automatically derived by completeusersproof.c from a Virtual Deduction User's Proof.

Theorem

notnotrALT2 38185

Converse of double negation. Theorem *2.14 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 102. Proof derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

Theorem

sspwimpALT2 38186

If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. Proof derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html format is displayed in http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sspwimpaltvd.html. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Theorem

e2ebindALT 38187

Absorption of an existential quantifier of a double existential quantifier of non-distinct variables. The proof is derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html format is displayed in e2ebindVD 38170. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑))

Theorem

ax6e2ndALT 38188*

If at least two sets exist (dtru 4783) , then the same is true expressed in an alternate form similar to the form of ax6e 2238. The proof is derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html format is displayed in ax6e2ndVD 38166. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))

Theorem

ax6e2ndeqALT 38189*

"At least two sets exist" expressed in the form of dtru 4783 is logically equivalent to the same expressed in a form similar to ax6e 2238 if dtru 4783 is false implies 𝑢 = 𝑣. Proof derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html format is displayed in ax6e2ndeqVD 38167. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))

Theorem

2sb5ndALT 38190*

Equivalence for double substitution 2sb5 2431 without distinct 𝑥, 𝑦 requirement. 2sb5nd 37797 is derived from 2sb5ndVD 38168. The proof is derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html format is displayed in 2sb5ndVD 38168. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 19-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))

Theorem

chordthmALT 38191*

The intersecting chords theorem. If points A, B, C, and D lie on a circle (with center Q, say), and the point P is on the interior of the segments AB and CD, then the two products of lengths PA · PB and PC · PD are equal. The Euclidean plane is identified with the complex plane, and the fact that P is on AB and on CD is expressed by the hypothesis that the angles APB and CPD are equal to π. The result is proven by using chordthmlem5 24363 twice to show that PA · PB and PC · PD both equal BQ ² − PQ ² . This is similar to the proof of the theorem given in Euclid's Elements, where it is Proposition III.35. Proven by David Moews on 28-Feb-2017 as chordthm 24364. http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/chordthmaltvd.html is a Virtual Deduction User's Proof transcription of chordthm 24364. That VD User's Proof was input into completeusersproof, automatically generating this chordthmALT 38191 Metamath proof. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 19-Sep-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝑃)𝐹(𝐵 − 𝑃)) = π)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 − 𝑃)𝐹(𝐷 − 𝑃)) = π)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝑄)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) = (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝑄)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) = (abs‘(𝐷 − 𝑄)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘(𝑃 − 𝐴)) · (abs‘(𝑃 − 𝐵))) = ((abs‘(𝑃 − 𝐶)) · (abs‘(𝑃 − 𝐷))))

Theorem

isosctrlem1ALT 38192

Lemma for isosctr 24351. This proof was automatically derived by completeusersproof from its Virtual Deduction proof counterpart http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/isosctrlem1altvd.html. As it is verified by the Metamath program, isosctrlem1ALT 38192 verifies http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/isosctrlem1altvd.html. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Apr-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) = 1 ∧ ¬ 1 = 𝐴) → (ℑ‘(log‘(1 − 𝐴))) ≠ π)

Theorem

iunconlem2 38193*

The indexed union of connected overlapping subspaces sharing a common point is connected. This proof was automatically derived by completeusersproof from its Virtual Deduction proof counterpart http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconlem2vd.html. As it is verified by the Metamath program, iunconlem2 38193 verifies http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconlem2vd.html. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Apr-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (𝑢 ∩ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑣 ∩ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)) ∧ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (𝑢 ∪ 𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐽 ↾_t 𝐵) ∈ Con)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ↾_t ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∈ Con)

Theorem

iunconALT 38194*

The indexed union of connected overlapping subspaces sharing a common point is connected. This proof was automatically derived by completeusersproof from its Virtual Deduction proof counterpart http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconaltvd.html. As it is verified by the Metamath program, iunconALT 38194 verifies http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconaltvd.html. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Apr-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐽 ↾_t 𝐵) ∈ Con)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ↾_t ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∈ Con)

Theorem

sineq0ALT 38195

A complex number whose sine is zero is an integer multiple of π. The Virtual Deduction form of the proof is http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sineq0altvd.html. The Metamath form of the proof is sineq0ALT 38195. The Virtual Deduction proof is based on Mario Carneiro's revision of Norm Megill's proof of sineq0 24077. The Virtual Deduction proof is verified by automatically transforming it into the Metamath form of the proof using completeusersproof, which is verified by the Metamath program. The proof of http://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sineq0altro.html is a form of the completed proof which preserves the Virtual Deduction proof's step numbers and their ordering. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((sin‘𝐴) = 0 ↔ (𝐴 / π) ∈ ℤ))

21.31  Mathbox for Glauco Siliprandi

21.31.1  Miscellanea

Theorem

fnvinran 38196

the function value belongs to its codomain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐵)

Theorem

evth2f 38197*

A version of evth2 22567 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑋    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑋    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (topGen‘ran (,))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ Comp)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑦))

Theorem

elunif 38198*

A version of eluni 4375 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Theorem

rzalf 38199

A version of rzal 4025 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = ∅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Theorem

fvelrnbf 38200

A version of fvelrnb 6153 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵))