Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 65 of 424) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-27159) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(27160-28684) |
Users' Mathboxes
(28685-42360) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | rexima 6401* | Existential quantification under an image in terms of the base set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝑦) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | ralima 6402* | Universal quantification under an image in terms of the base set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝑦) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | idref 6403* |
TODO: This is the same as issref 5428 (which has a much longer proof).
Should we replace issref 5428 with this one? - NM 9-May-2016.
Two ways to state a relation is reflexive. (Adapted from Tarski.) (Contributed by FL, 15-Jan-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥) | ||
Theorem | fvclss 6404* | Upper bound for the class of values of a class. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-1995.) |
⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)} ⊆ (ran 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) | ||
Theorem | elabrex 6405* | Elementhood in an image set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵}) | ||
Theorem | abrexco 6406* | Composition of two image maps 𝐶(𝑦) and 𝐵(𝑤). (Contributed by NM, 27-May-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = 𝐵}𝑥 = 𝐶} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐷} | ||
Theorem | imaiun 6407* | The image of an indexed union is the indexed union of the images. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 “ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 “ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | imauni 6408* | The image of a union is the indexed union of the images. Theorem 3K(a) of [Enderton] p. 50. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 “ ∪ 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 “ 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | fniunfv 6409* | The indexed union of a function's values is the union of its range. Compare Definition 5.4 of [Monk1] p. 50. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∪ ran 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | funiunfv 6410* |
The indexed union of a function's values is the union of its image under
the index class.
Note: This theorem depends on the fact that our function value is the empty set outside of its domain. If the antecedent is changed to 𝐹 Fn 𝐴, the theorem can be proved without this dependency. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | funiunfvf 6411* | The indexed union of a function's values is the union of its image under the index class. This version of funiunfv 6410 uses a bound-variable hypothesis in place of a distinct variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2006.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 15-Apr-2013.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | eluniima 6412* | Membership in the union of an image of a function. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | elunirn 6413* | Membership in the union of the range of a function. See elunirnALT 6414 for a shorter proof which uses ax-pow 4769. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | elunirnALT 6414* | Alternate proof of elunirn 6413. It is shorter but requires ax-pow 4769 (through eluniima 6412, funiunfv 6410, ndmfv 6128). (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | fnunirn 6415* | Membership in a union of some function-defined family of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐼 → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | dff13 6416* | A one-to-one function in terms of function values. Compare Theorem 4.8(iv) of [Monk1] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | dff13f 6417* | A one-to-one function in terms of function values. Compare Theorem 4.8(iv) of [Monk1] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | f1veqaeq 6418 | If the values of a one-to-one function for two arguments are equal, the arguments themselves must be equal. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Nov-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐷) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | f1mpt 6419* | Express injection for a mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 = 𝐷 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | f1fveq 6420 | Equality of function values for a one-to-one function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-1997.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐷) ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | f1elima 6421 | Membership in the image of a 1-1 map. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | f1imass 6422 | Taking images under a one-to-one function preserves subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 “ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐹 “ 𝐷) ↔ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | f1imaeq 6423 | Taking images under a one-to-one function preserves equality. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 “ 𝐶) = (𝐹 “ 𝐷) ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | f1imapss 6424 | Taking images under a one-to-one function preserves proper subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 “ 𝐶) ⊊ (𝐹 “ 𝐷) ↔ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | f1dom3fv3dif 6425 | The function values for a 1-1 function from a set with three different elements are different. (Contributed by AV, 20-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:{𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}–1-1→𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐶) ∧ (𝐹‘𝐵) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | f1dom3el3dif 6426* | The range of a 1-1 function from a set with three different elements has (at least) three different elements. (Contributed by AV, 20-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:{𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}–1-1→𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑅 (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | dff14a 6427* | A one-to-one function in terms of different function values for different arguments. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jan-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | dff14b 6428* | A one-to-one function in terms of different function values for different arguments. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jan-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥})(𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | f12dfv 6429 | A one-to-one function with a domain with at least two different elements in terms of function values. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑋, 𝑌} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑌)))) | ||
Theorem | f13dfv 6430 | A one-to-one function with a domain with at least three different elements in terms of function values. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jan-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)) → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑌) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑍) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑌) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑍))))) | ||
Theorem | dff1o6 6431* | A one-to-one onto function in terms of function values. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2008.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | f1ocnvfv1 6432 | The converse value of the value of a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2004.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (◡𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝐶)) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | f1ocnvfv2 6433 | The value of the converse value of a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2004.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(◡𝐹‘𝐶)) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | f1ocnvfv 6434 | Relationship between the value of a one-to-one onto function and the value of its converse. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷 → (◡𝐹‘𝐷) = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | f1ocnvfvb 6435 | Relationship between the value of a one-to-one onto function and the value of its converse. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2004.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷 ↔ (◡𝐹‘𝐷) = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | nvof1o 6436 | An involution is a bijection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴) | ||
Theorem | nvocnv 6437* | The converse of an involution is the function itself. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-May-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = 𝑥) → ◡𝐹 = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | fsnex 6438* | Relate a function with a singleton as domain and one variable. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑓(𝑓:{𝐴}⟶𝐷 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | f1prex 6439* | Relate a one-to-one function with a pair as domain and two different variables. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝐵) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (∃𝑓(𝑓:{𝐴, 𝐵}–1-1→𝐷 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | f1ocnvdm 6440 | The value of the converse of a one-to-one onto function belongs to its domain. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (◡𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | f1ocnvfvrneq 6441 | If the values of a one-to-one function for two arguments from the range of the function are equal, the arguments themselves must be equal. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Nov-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐹)) → ((◡𝐹‘𝐶) = (◡𝐹‘𝐷) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | fcof1 6442 | An application is injective if a retraction exists. Proposition 8 of [BourbakiEns] p. E.II.18. (Contributed by FL, 11-Nov-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝑅 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) | ||
Theorem | fcofo 6443 | An application is surjective if a section exists. Proposition 8 of [BourbakiEns] p. E.II.18. (Contributed by FL, 17-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑆:𝐵⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝑆) = ( I ↾ 𝐵)) → 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cbvfo 6444* | Change bound variable between domain and range of function. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | cbvexfo 6445* | Change bound variable between domain and range of function. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1997.) |
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | cocan1 6446 | An injection is left-cancelable. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐾:𝐴⟶𝐵) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐾) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾)) | ||
Theorem | cocan2 6447 | A surjection is right-cancelable. (Contributed by FL, 21-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾)) | ||
Theorem | fcof1oinvd 6448 | Show that a function is the inverse of a bijective function if their composition is the identity function. Formerly part of proof of fcof1o 6451. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹 = 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | fcof1od 6449 | A function is bijective if a "retraction" and a "section" exist, see comments for fcof1 6442 and fcofo 6443. Formerly part of proof of fcof1o 6451. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
Theorem | 2fcoidinvd 6450 | Show that a function is the inverse of a function if their compositions are the identity functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹 = 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | fcof1o 6451 | Show that two functions are inverse to each other by computing their compositions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))) → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | 2fvcoidd 6452* | Show that the composition of two functions is the identity function by applying both functions to each value of the domain of the first function. (Contributed by AV, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑎)) = 𝑎) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | 2fvidf1od 6453* | A function is bijective if it has an inverse function. (Contributed by AV, 15-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑎)) = 𝑎) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑏)) = 𝑏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
Theorem | 2fvidinvd 6454* | Show that two functions are inverse to each other by applying them twice to each value of their domains. (Contributed by AV, 13-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑎)) = 𝑎) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑏)) = 𝑏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹 = 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | foeqcnvco 6455 | Condition for function equality in terms of vanishing of the composition with the converse. EDITORIAL: Is there a relation-algebraic proof of this? (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (𝐹 ∘ ◡𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | f1eqcocnv 6456 | Condition for function equality in terms of vanishing of the composition with the inverse. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | fveqf1o 6457 | Given a bijection 𝐹, produce another bijection 𝐺 which additionally maps two specified points. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ∘ (( I ↾ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐶, (◡𝐹‘𝐷)})) ∪ {〈𝐶, (◡𝐹‘𝐷)〉, 〈(◡𝐹‘𝐷), 𝐶〉})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ (𝐺‘𝐶) = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | fliftrel 6458* | 𝐹, a function lift, is a subset of 𝑅 × 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑅 × 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | fliftel 6459* | Elementhood in the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐹𝐷 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐶 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 = 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | fliftel1 6460* | Elementhood in the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴𝐹𝐵) | ||
Theorem | fliftcnv 6461* | Converse of the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉)) | ||
Theorem | fliftfun 6462* | The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘𝐴 = 𝐵, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐴 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | fliftfund 6463* | The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘𝐴 = 𝐵, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) → 𝐵 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | fliftfuns 6464* | The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘𝐴 = 𝐵, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 = ⦋𝑧 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 → ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝑧 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | fliftf 6465* | The domain and range of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ 𝐹:ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 𝐴)⟶𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | fliftval 6466* | The value of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑌 → 𝐴 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑌 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | isoeq1 6467 | Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐻 = 𝐺 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | isoeq2 6468 | Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) |
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑇 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑇, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | isoeq3 6469 | Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) |
⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑇 (𝐴, 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | isoeq4 6470 | Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐶, 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | isoeq5 6471 | Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | nfiso 6472 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an isomorphism. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐻 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑆 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | isof1o 6473 | An isomorphism is a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
Theorem | isof1oidb 6474 | A function is a bijection iff it is an isomorphism regarding the identity relation. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ 𝐻 Isom I , I (𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | isof1oopb 6475 | A function is a bijection iff it is an isomorphism regarding the universal class of ordered pairs as relations. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ 𝐻 Isom (V × V), (V × V)(𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | isorel 6476 | An isomorphism connects binary relations via its function values. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶𝑅𝐷 ↔ (𝐻‘𝐶)𝑆(𝐻‘𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | soisores 6477* | Express the condition of isomorphism on two strict orders for a function's restriction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 Or 𝐶) ∧ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, (𝐹 “ 𝐴)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐹‘𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | soisoi 6478* | Infer isomorphism from one direction of an order proof for isomorphisms between strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Po 𝐵) ∧ (𝐻:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝐻‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐻‘𝑦)))) → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | isoid 6479 | Identity law for isomorphism. Proposition 6.30(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | isocnv 6480 | Converse law for isomorphism. Proposition 6.30(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → ◡𝐻 Isom 𝑆, 𝑅 (𝐵, 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | isocnv2 6481 | Converse law for isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom ◡𝑅, ◡𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | isocnv3 6482 | Complementation law for isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∖ 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝐵 × 𝐵) ∖ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝐶, 𝐷 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | isores2 6483 | An isomorphism from one well-order to another can be restricted on either well-order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, (𝑆 ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵))(𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | isores1 6484 | An isomorphism from one well-order to another can be restricted on either well-order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)), 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | isores3 6485 | Induced isomorphism on a subset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 = (𝐻 “ 𝐾)) → (𝐻 ↾ 𝐾) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐾, 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | isotr 6486 | Composition (transitive) law for isomorphism. Proposition 6.30(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑆, 𝑇 (𝐵, 𝐶)) → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐻) Isom 𝑅, 𝑇 (𝐴, 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | isomin 6487 | Isomorphisms preserve minimal elements. Note that (◡𝑅 “ {𝐷}) is Takeuti and Zaring's idiom for the initial segment {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝐷}. Proposition 6.31(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐶 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝐷})) = ∅ ↔ ((𝐻 “ 𝐶) ∩ (◡𝑆 “ {(𝐻‘𝐷)})) = ∅)) | ||
Theorem | isoini 6488 | Isomorphisms preserve initial segments. Proposition 6.31(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 20-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐻 “ (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝐷}))) = (𝐵 ∩ (◡𝑆 “ {(𝐻‘𝐷)}))) | ||
Theorem | isoini2 6489 | Isomorphisms are isomorphisms on their initial segments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Mar-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑋})) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐵 ∩ (◡𝑆 “ {(𝐻‘𝑋)})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐻 ↾ 𝐶) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐶, 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | isofrlem 6490* | Lemma for isofr 6492. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 “ 𝑥) ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | isoselem 6491* | Lemma for isose 6493. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 “ 𝑥) ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Se 𝐴 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | isofr 6492 | An isomorphism preserves well-foundedness. Proposition 6.32(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | isose 6493 | An isomorphism preserves set-like relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Se 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | isofr2 6494 | A weak form of isofr 6492 that does not need Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | isopolem 6495 | Lemma for isopo 6496. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑆 Po 𝐵 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | isopo 6496 | An isomorphism preserves partial ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Po 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | isosolem 6497 | Lemma for isoso 6498. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑆 Or 𝐵 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | isoso 6498 | An isomorphism preserves strict ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | isowe 6499 | An isomorphism preserves well-ordering. Proposition 6.32(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 We 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | isowe2 6500* | A weak form of isowe 6499 that does not need Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝐻 “ 𝑥) ∈ V) → (𝑆 We 𝐵 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |