P. 117 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 11601-11700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	elnn0uz 11601	A nonnegative integer expressed as a member an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2006.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ↔ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘0))
Theorem	eluz2nn 11602	An integer is greater than or equal to 2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 3-Nov-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eluzge2nn0 11603	If an integer is greater than or equal to 2, then it is a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Nov-2018.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eluz2n0 11604	An integer greater than or equal to 2 is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 𝑁 ≠ 0)
Theorem	uzuzle23 11605	An integer in the upper set of integers starting at 3 is element of the upper set of integers starting at 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))
Theorem	eluzge3nn 11606	If an integer is greater than 3, then it is a positive integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	uz3m2nn 11607	An integer greater than or equal to 3 decreased by 2 is a positive integer, analogous to uz2m1nn 11639. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → (𝑁 − 2) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	1eluzge0 11608	1 is an integer greater than or equal to 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 1 ∈ (ℤ≥‘0)
Theorem	2eluzge0 11609	2 is an integer greater than or equal to 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 2 ∈ (ℤ≥‘0)
Theorem	2eluzge1 11610	2 is an integer greater than or equal to 1. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 2 ∈ (ℤ≥‘1)
Theorem	uznnssnn 11611	The upper integers starting from a natural are a subset of the naturals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ⊆ ℕ)
Theorem	raluz 11612*	Restricted universal quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	raluz2 11613*	Restricted universal quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	rexuz 11614*	Restricted existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	rexuz2 11615*	Restricted existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)𝜑 ↔ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑀 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	2rexuz 11616*	Double existential quantification in an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℤ (𝑚 ≤ 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	peano2uz 11617	Second Peano postulate for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	peano2uzs 11618	Second Peano postulate for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2013.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 → (𝑁 + 1) ∈ 𝑍)
Theorem	peano2uzr 11619	Reversed second Peano axiom for upper integers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	uzaddcl 11620	Addition closure law for an upper set of integers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑁 + 𝐾) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))
Theorem	nn0pzuz 11621	The sum of a nonnegative integer and an integer is an integer greater than or equal to that integer. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑁 + 𝑍) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑍))
Theorem	uzind4 11622*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀. The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need, and the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	uzind4ALT 11623*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀. The last four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the first two are the basis and the induction step. Either uzind4 11622 or uzind4ALT 11623 may be used; see comment for nnind 10915. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	uzind4s 11624*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑘]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑘]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑘]𝜑)
Theorem	uzind4s2 11625*	Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer 𝑀, using explicit substitution. The hypotheses are the basis and the induction step. Use this instead of uzind4s 11624 when 𝑗 and 𝑘 must be distinct in [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑗]𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ → [𝑀 / 𝑗]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → ([𝑘 / 𝑗]𝜑 → [(𝑘 + 1) / 𝑗]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → [𝑁 / 𝑗]𝜑)
Theorem	uzind4i 11626*	Induction on the upper integers that start at 𝑀. The first hypothesis specifies the lower bound, the next four give us the substitution instances we need, and the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.)
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑀 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = (𝑘 + 1) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑁 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) → 𝜏)
Theorem	uzwo 11627*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty subset of an upper set of integers has the least element. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 𝑗 ≤ 𝑘)
Theorem	uzwo2 11628*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty subset of an upper set of integers has a unique least element. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → ∃!𝑗 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 𝑗 ≤ 𝑘)
Theorem	nnwo 11629*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty set of positive integers has a least element. Theorem I.37 (well-ordering principle) of [Apostol] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	nnwof 11630*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty set of positive integers has a least element. This version allows 𝑥 and 𝑦 to be present in 𝐴 as long as they are effectively not free. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	nnwos 11631*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty set of positive integers has a least element (schema form). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)))
Theorem	indstr 11632*	Strong Mathematical Induction for positive integers (inference schema). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → (∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → 𝜓) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)
Theorem	eluznn0 11633	Membership in a nonnegative upper set of integers implies membership in ℕ0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	eluznn 11634	Membership in a positive upper set of integers implies membership in ℕ. (Contributed by JJ, 1-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eluz2b1 11635	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2." (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 1 < 𝑁))
Theorem	eluz2gt1 11636	An integer greater than or equal to 2 is greater than 1. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → 1 < 𝑁)
Theorem	eluz2b2 11637	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2." (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 1 < 𝑁))
Theorem	eluz2b3 11638	Two ways to say "an integer greater than or equal to 2." (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 23-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 1))
Theorem	uz2m1nn 11639	One less than an integer greater than or equal to 2 is a positive integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	1nuz2 11640	1 is not in (ℤ≥‘2). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ¬ 1 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)
Theorem	elnn1uz2 11641	A positive integer is either 1 or greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ↔ (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)))
Theorem	uz2mulcl 11642	Closure of multiplication of integers greater than or equal to 2. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 26-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑀 · 𝑁) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))
Theorem	indstr2 11643*	Strong Mathematical Induction for positive integers (inference schema). The first two hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need; the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → 𝜓) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℕ → 𝜑)
Theorem	uzinfi 11644	Extract the lower bound of an upper set of integers as its infimum. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ    ⇒   ⊢ inf((ℤ≥‘𝑀), ℝ, < ) = 𝑀
Theorem	nninf 11645	The infimum of the set of positive integers is one. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.)
⊢ inf(ℕ, ℝ, < ) = 1
Theorem	nn0inf 11646	The infimum of the set of nonnegative integers is zero. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.)
⊢ inf(ℕ0, ℝ, < ) = 0
Theorem	infssuzle 11647	The infimum of a subset of an upper set of integers is less than or equal to all members of the subset. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	infssuzcl 11648	The infimum of a subset of an upper set of integers belongs to the subset. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 5-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → inf(𝑆, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	ublbneg 11649*	The image under negation of a bounded-above set of reals is bounded below. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	eqreznegel 11650*	Two ways to express the image under negation of a set of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℤ → {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴} = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴})
Theorem	supminf 11651*	The supremum of a bounded-above set of reals is the negation of the infimum of that set's image under negation. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.) ( Revised by AV, 13-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) = -inf({𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ -𝑧 ∈ 𝐴}, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	lbzbi 11652*	If a set of reals is bounded below, it is bounded below by an integer. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
Theorem	zsupss 11653*	Any nonempty bounded subset of integers has a supremum in the set. (The proof does not use ax-pre-sup 9893.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	suprzcl2 11654*	The supremum of a bounded-above set of integers is a member of the set. (This version of suprzcl 11333 avoids ax-pre-sup 9893.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	suprzub 11655*	The supremum of a bounded-above set of integers is greater than any member of the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	uzsupss 11656*	Any bounded subset of an upper set of integers has a supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑍 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑍 (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
Theorem	nn01to3 11657	A (nonnegative) integer between 1 and 3 must be 1, 2 or 3. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 1 ≤ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 3) → (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 = 2 ∨ 𝑁 = 3))
Theorem	nn0ge2m1nnALT 11658	Alternate proof of nn0ge2m1nn 11237: If a nonnegative integer is greater than or equal to two, the integer decreased by 1 is a positive integer. This version is proved using eluz2 11569, a theorem for upper sets of integers, which are defined later than the positive and nonnegative integers. This proof is, however, much shorter than the proof of nn0ge2m1nn 11237. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Aug-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 2 ≤ 𝑁) → (𝑁 − 1) ∈ ℕ)
5.4.12  Well-ordering principle for bounded-below sets of integers
Theorem	uzwo3 11659*	Well-ordering principle: any nonempty subset of an upper set of integers has a unique least element. This generalization of uzwo2 11628 allows the lower bound 𝐵 to be any real number. See also nnwo 11629 and nnwos 11631. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ 𝐵 ≤ 𝑧} ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	zmin 11660*	There is a unique smallest integer greater than or equal to a given real number. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)))
Theorem	zmax 11661*	There is a unique largest integer less than or equal to a given real number. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℤ (𝑦 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))
Theorem	zbtwnre 11662*	There is a unique integer between a real number and the number plus one. Exercise 5 of [Apostol] p. 28. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 < (𝐴 + 1)))
Theorem	rebtwnz 11663*	There is a unique greatest integer less than or equal to a real number. Exercise 4 of [Apostol] p. 28. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℤ (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 < (𝑥 + 1)))
5.4.13  Rational numbers (as a subset of complex numbers)
Syntax	cq 11664	Extend class notation to include the class of rationals.
class ℚ
Definition	df-q 11665	Define the set of rational numbers. Based on definition of rationals in [Apostol] p. 22. See elq 11666 for the relation "is rational." (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ℚ = ( / “ (ℤ × ℕ))
Theorem	elq 11666*	Membership in the set of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 = (𝑥 / 𝑦))
Theorem	qmulz 11667*	If 𝐴 is rational, then some integer multiple of it is an integer. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐴 · 𝑥) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	znq 11668	The ratio of an integer and a positive integer is a rational number. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qre 11669	A rational number is a real number. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2002.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	zq 11670	An integer is a rational number. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2002.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	zssq 11671	The integers are a subset of the rationals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ℤ ⊆ ℚ
Theorem	nn0ssq 11672	The nonnegative integers are a subset of the rationals. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.)
⊢ ℕ0 ⊆ ℚ
Theorem	nnssq 11673	The positive integers are a subset of the rationals. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2004.)
⊢ ℕ ⊆ ℚ
Theorem	qssre 11674	The rationals are a subset of the reals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2002.)
⊢ ℚ ⊆ ℝ
Theorem	qsscn 11675	The rationals are a subset of the complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ℚ ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	qex 11676	The set of rational numbers exists. See also qexALT 11679. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℚ ∈ V
Theorem	nnq 11677	A positive integer is rational. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qcn 11678	A rational number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	qexALT 11679	Alternate proof of qex 11676. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℚ ∈ V
Theorem	qaddcl 11680	Closure of addition of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qnegcl 11681	Closure law for the negative of a rational. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℚ → -𝐴 ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qmulcl 11682	Closure of multiplication of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qsubcl 11683	Closure of subtraction of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qreccl 11684	Closure of reciprocal of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → (1 / 𝐴) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qdivcl 11685	Closure of division of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 / 𝐵) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	qrevaddcl 11686	Reverse closure law for addition of rationals. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℚ → ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℚ) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ℚ))
Theorem	nnrecq 11687	The reciprocal of a positive integer is rational. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (1 / 𝐴) ∈ ℚ)
Theorem	irradd 11688	The sum of an irrational number and a rational number is irrational. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
Theorem	irrmul 11689	The product of an irrational with a nonzero rational is irrational. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
5.4.14  Existence of the set of complex numbers
Theorem	rpnnen1lem2 11690*	Lemma for rpnnen1 11696. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem1 11691*	Lemma for rpnnen1 11696. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 13-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (ℚ ↑𝑚 ℕ))
Theorem	rpnnen1lem3 11692*	Lemma for rpnnen1 11696. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 13-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ∀𝑛 ∈ ran (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem4 11693*	Lemma for rpnnen1 11696. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 13-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → sup(ran (𝐹‘𝑥), ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem5 11694*	Lemma for rpnnen1 11696. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 13-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → sup(ran (𝐹‘𝑥), ℝ, < ) = 𝑥)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem6 11695*	Lemma for rpnnen1 11696. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) (Revised by NM, 15-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    &   ⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ℝ ≼ (ℚ ↑𝑚 ℕ)
Theorem	rpnnen1 11696	One half of rpnnen 14795, where we show an injection from the real numbers to sequences of rational numbers. Specifically, we map a real number 𝑥 to the sequence (𝐹‘𝑥):ℕ⟶ℚ (see rpnnen1lem6 11695) such that ((𝐹‘𝑥)‘𝑘) is the largest rational number with denominator 𝑘 that is strictly less than 𝑥. In this manner, we get a monotonically increasing sequence that converges to 𝑥, and since each sequence converges to a unique real number, this mapping from reals to sequences of rational numbers is injective. Note: The ℕ and ℚ existence hypotheses provide for use with either nnex 10903 and qex 11676, or nnexALT 10899 and qexALT 11679. The proof should not be modified to use any of those 4 theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (Revised by NM, 15-Aug-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ℕ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ℚ ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ℝ ≼ (ℚ ↑𝑚 ℕ)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem1OLD 11697*	Lemma for rpnnen1OLD 11701. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) Obsolete version of rpnnen1lem1 11691 as of 13-Aug-2021. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (ℚ ↑𝑚 ℕ))
Theorem	rpnnen1lem3OLD 11698*	Lemma for rpnnen1OLD 11701. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) Obsolete version of rpnnen1lem3 11692 as of 13-Aug-2021. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → ∀𝑛 ∈ ran (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑛 ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem4OLD 11699*	Lemma for rpnnen1OLD 11701. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) Obsolete version of rpnnen1lem4 11693 as of 13-Aug-2021. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → sup(ran (𝐹‘𝑥), ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rpnnen1lem5OLD 11700*	Lemma for rpnnen1OLD 11701. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2013.) Obsolete version of rpnnen1lem5 11694 as of 13-Aug-2021. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑛 ∈ ℤ ∣ (𝑛 / 𝑘) < 𝑥}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ ↦ (sup(𝑇, ℝ, < ) / 𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ → sup(ran (𝐹‘𝑥), ℝ, < ) = 𝑥)