P. 324 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 32301-32400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
21.14.6.3  Addition and opposite We define the operations on the extended real and complex numbers and on the real and complex projective lines simultaneously, thus "overloading" the operations.
Syntax	caddcc 32301	Syntax for the addition of extended complex numbers.
class +ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-addc 32302	Define the additions on the extended complex numbers (on the subset of (ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) where it makes sense) and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (((ℂ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̅ × ℂ)) ∪ ((ℂ̂ × ℂ̂) ∪ (Diag‘ℂ∞))) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, if((2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, ((1st ‘𝑥) + (2nd ‘𝑥)), (2nd ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘𝑥))))
Syntax	coppcc 32303	Syntax for the opposite of extended complex numbers.
class -ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-oppc 32304	Define the negation (operation givin the opposite) the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). One could use the prcpal function in the infinite case, but we want to use only basic functions at this point. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = ∞, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, -𝑥, (inftyexpi ‘if(0 < (1st ‘𝑥), ((1st ‘𝑥) − π), ((1st ‘𝑥) + π))))))
21.14.6.4  Argument, multiplication and inverse Since one needs arguments in order to define multiplication in ℂ̅, it seems harder to put this at the very beginning of the introduction of complex numbers.
Syntax	cprcpal 32305	Syntax for the function prcpal.
class prcpal
Definition	df-bj-prcpal 32306	Define the function prcpal. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ prcpal = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝑥 mod (2 · π)) − if((𝑥 mod (2 · π)) ≤ π, 0, (2 · π))))
Syntax	carg 32307	Syntax for the argument of a nonzero extended complex number.
class Arg
Definition	df-bj-arg 32308	Define the argument of a nonzero extended complex number. By convention, it has values in (-π, π]. Another convention chooses [0, 2π) but the present one simplifies formulas giving the argument as an arctangent. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Arg = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∖ {0}) ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (ℑ‘(log‘𝑥)), (1st ‘𝑥)))
Syntax	cmulc 32309	Syntax for the multiplication of extended complex numbers.
class ·ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-mulc 32310	Define the multiplication of extended complex numbers and of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). In our convention, a product with 0 is 0, even when the other factor is infinite. An alternate convention leaves products of 0 with an infinite number undefined since the multiplication is not continuous at these points. Note that our convention entails (0 / 0) = 0. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ·ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = 0 ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = 0), 0, if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ (ℂ × ℂ), ((1st ‘𝑥) · (2nd ‘𝑥)), (inftyexpi ‘(prcpal‘((Arg‘(1st ‘𝑥)) + (Arg‘(2nd ‘𝑥)))))))))
Syntax	cinvc 32311	Syntax for the inverse of nonzero extended complex numbers.
class -1ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-invc 32312	Define inversion, which maps a nonzero extended complex number or element of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) to its inverse. Beware of the overloading: the equality (-1ℂ̅‘0) = ∞ is to be understood in the complex projective line, but 0 as an extended complex number does not have an inverse, which we can state as (-1ℂ̅‘0) ∉ ℂ̅. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -1ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (1 / 𝑥), 0)))
21.14.7  Monoids See ccmn 18016 and subsequents. The first few statements of this subsection can be put very early after ccmn 18016. Proposal: in the main part, make separate subsections of commutative monoids and abelian groups. Relabel cabl 18017 to "cabl" or, preferably, other labels containing "abl" to "abel", for consistency.
Theorem	bj-cmnssmnd 32313	Commutative monoids are monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ CMnd ⊆ Mnd
Theorem	bj-cmnssmndel 32314	Commutative monoids are monoids (elemental version). This is a more direct proof of cmnmnd 18031, which relies on iscmn 18023. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ CMnd → 𝐴 ∈ Mnd)
Theorem	bj-ablssgrp 32315	Abelian groups are groups. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Abel ⊆ Grp
Theorem	bj-ablssgrpel 32316	Abelian groups are groups (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablgrp 18021. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ Grp)
Theorem	bj-ablsscmn 32317	Abelian groups are commutative monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Abel ⊆ CMnd
Theorem	bj-ablsscmnel 32318	Abelian groups are commutative monoids (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of ablcmn 18022. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Abel → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd)
Theorem	bj-modssabl 32319	(The additive groups of) modules are abelian groups. (The elemental version is lmodabl 18733; see also lmodgrp 18693 and lmodcmn 18734.) (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ LMod ⊆ Abel
Theorem	bj-vecssmod 32320	Vector spaces are modules. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ LVec ⊆ LMod
Theorem	bj-vecssmodel 32321	Vector spaces are modules (elemental version). This is a shorter proof of lveclmod 18927. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ LVec → 𝐴 ∈ LMod)
21.14.7.1  Finite sums in monoids UPDATE: a similar summation is already defined as df-gsum 15926 (although it mixes finite and infinite sums, which makes it harder to understand).
Syntax	cfinsum 32322	Syntax for the class "finite summation in monoids".
class FinSum
Definition	df-bj-finsum 32323*	Finite summation in commutative monoids. This finite summation function can be extended to pairs ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ where 𝑦 is a left-unital magma and 𝑧 is defined on a totally ordered set (choosing left-associative composition), or dropping unitality and requiring nonempty families, or on any monoids for families of permutable elements, etc. We use the term "summation", even though the definition stands for any unital, commutative and associative composition law. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ FinSum = (𝑥 ∈ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ CMnd ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ Fin 𝑧:𝑡⟶(Base‘𝑦))} ↦ (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→dom (2nd ‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘(1st ‘𝑥)), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑥)‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘𝑚))))
Theorem	bj-finsumval0 32324*	Value of a finite sum. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐼⟶(Base‘𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 FinSum 𝐵) = (℩𝑠∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐼 ∧ 𝑠 = (seq1((+g‘𝐴), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝐵‘(𝑓‘𝑛))))‘(#‘𝐼)))))
21.14.8  Affine, Euclidean, and Cartesian geometry A few basic theorems to start affine, Euclidean, and Cartesian geometry.
21.14.8.1  Convex hull in real vector spaces A few basic definitions and theorems about convex hulls in real vector spaces. TODO: prove inclusion in the class of subcomplex vector spaces.
Syntax	crrvec 32325	Syntax for the class of real vector spaces.
class ℝ-Vec
Definition	df-bj-rrvec 32326	Definition of the class of real vector spaces. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ-Vec = {𝑥 ∈ LVec ∣ (Scalar‘𝑥) = ℝfld}
Theorem	bj-rrvecssvec 32327	Real vector spaces are vector spaces. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ LVec
Theorem	bj-rrvecssvecel 32328	Real vector spaces are vector spaces (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝐴 ∈ LVec)
Theorem	bj-rrvecsscmn 32329	(The additive groups of) real vector spaces are commutative monoids. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ CMnd
Theorem	bj-rrvecsscmnel 32330	(The additive groups of) real vector spaces are commutative monoids (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝐴 ∈ CMnd)
21.14.8.2  Complex numbers (supplements) Some lemmas to ease algebraic manipulations.
Theorem	bj-subcom 32331	A consequence of commutativity of multiplication. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) − (𝐵 · 𝐴)) = 0)
Theorem	bj-ldiv 32332	Left-division. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 / 𝐵)))
Theorem	bj-rdiv 32333	Right-division. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 = (𝐶 / 𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-mdiv 32334	A division law. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = (𝐶 / 𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 = (𝐶 / 𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-lineq 32335	Solution of a (scalar) linear equation. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 · 𝑋) + 𝐵) = 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = ((𝑌 − 𝐵) / 𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-lineqi 32336	Solution of a (scalar) linear equation. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + 𝐵) = 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ((𝑌 − 𝐵) / 𝐴))
21.14.8.3  Barycentric coordinates Lemmas about barycentric coordinates. For the moment, this is limited to the one-dimensional case (complex line), where existence and uniqueness of barycentric coordinates is proved by bj-bary1 32339 (which computes them).
Theorem	bj-bary1lem 32337	A lemma for barycentric coordinates in one dimension. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ((((𝐵 − 𝑋) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · 𝐴) + (((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · 𝐵)))
Theorem	bj-bary1lem1 32338	Existence and uniqueness (and actual computation) of barycentric coordinates in dimension 1 (complex line). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 = ((𝑆 · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑆 + 𝑇) = 1) → 𝑇 = ((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴))))
Theorem	bj-bary1 32339	Barycentric coordinates in one dimension. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 = ((𝑆 · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑆 + 𝑇) = 1) ↔ (𝑆 = ((𝐵 − 𝑋) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑇 = ((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)))))
21.15  Mathbox for Jim Kingdon
Syntax	ctau 32340	Extend class notation to include tau = 6.283185....
class τ
Definition	df-tau 32341	Define tau = 6.283185..., which is the smallest positive real number whose cosine is one. Various notations have been used or proposed for this number including τ, a three-legged variant of π, or 2π. Note the difference between this constant τ and the variable 𝜏 which is a variable representing a propositional logic formula. Only the latter is italic, and the colors are different. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.)
⊢ τ = inf((ℝ+ ∩ (◡cos “ {1})), ℝ, < )
Theorem	taupilem3 32342	Lemma for tau-related theorems . (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℝ+ ∩ (◡cos “ {1})) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (cos‘𝐴) = 1))
Theorem	taupilemrplb 32343*	A set of positive reals has (in the reals) a lower bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (ℝ+ ∩ 𝐴)𝑥 ≤ 𝑦
Theorem	taupilem1 32344	Lemma for taupi 32346. A positive real whose cosine is one is at least 2 · π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (cos‘𝐴) = 1) → (2 · π) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	taupilem2 32345	Lemma for taupi 32346. The smallest positive real whose cosine is one is at most 2 · π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.)
⊢ τ ≤ (2 · π)
Theorem	taupi 32346	Relationship between τ and π. This can be seen as connecting the ratio of a circle's circumference to its radius and the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.)
⊢ τ = (2 · π)
21.16  Mathbox for ML
Theorem	csbdif 32347	Distribution of class substitution over difference of two classes. (Contributed by ML, 14-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∖ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	csbpredg 32348	Move class substitution in and out of the predecessor class of a relationship. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌Pred(𝑅, 𝐷, 𝑋) = Pred(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑅, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑋))
Theorem	csbwrecsg 32349	Move class substitution in and out of the well-founded recursive function generator . (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌wrecs(𝑅, 𝐷, 𝐹) = wrecs(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑅, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹))
Theorem	csbrecsg 32350	Move class substitution in and out of recs. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌recs(𝐹) = recs(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹))
Theorem	csbrdgg 32351	Move class substitution in and out of the recursive function generator. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = rec(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐼))
Theorem	csboprabg 32352*	Move class substitution in and out of class abstractions of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩, 𝑑⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩, 𝑑⟩ ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑})
Theorem	csbmpt22g 32353*	Move class substitution in and out of maps-to notation for operations. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝑦 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐷) = (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑌, 𝑧 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑍 ↦ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
Theorem	mpnanrd 32354	Eliminate the right side of a negated conjunction in an implication. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒)
Theorem	con1bii2 32355	A contraposition inference. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)
Theorem	con2bii2 32356	A contraposition inference. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	vtoclefex 32357*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜑)
Theorem	rnmptsn 32358*	The range of a function mapping to singletons. (Contributed by ML, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥}) = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}
Theorem	f1omptsnlem 32359*	This is the core of the proof of f1omptsn 32360, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝑅
Theorem	f1omptsn 32360*	A function mapping to singletons is bijective onto a set of singletons. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝑅
Theorem	mptsnunlem 32361*	This is the core of the proof of mptsnun 32362, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	mptsnun 32362*	A class 𝐵 is equal to the union of the class of all singletons of elements of 𝐵. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	dissneqlem 32363*	This is the core of the proof of dissneq 32364, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴)) → 𝐵 = 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	dissneq 32364*	Any topology that contains every single-point set is the discrete topology. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴)) → 𝐵 = 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	exlimim 32365*	Closed form of exlimimd 32366. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) → 𝜓)
Theorem	exlimimd 32366*	Existential elimination rule of natural deduction. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	exlimimdd 32367	Existential elimination rule of natural deduction. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	exellim 32368*	Closed form of exellimddv 32369. See also exlimim 32365 for a more general theorem. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) → 𝜑)
Theorem	exellimddv 32369*	Eliminate an antecedent when the antecedent is elementhood, deduction version. See exellim 32368 for the closed form, which requires the use of a universal quantifier. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	topdifinfindis 32370*	Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is the trivial topology when 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by ML, 14-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝑇 = {∅, 𝐴})
Theorem	topdifinffinlem 32371*	This is the core of the proof of topdifinffin 32372, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definition, we need to split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	topdifinffin 32372*	Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is a topology only if 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	topdifinf 32373*	Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is a topology if and only if 𝐴 is finite, in which case it is the trivial topology. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝑇 = {∅, 𝐴}))
Theorem	topdifinfeq 32374*	Two different ways of defining the collection from Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. (Contributed by ML, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) = ∅ ∨ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) = 𝐴))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}
Theorem	icorempt2 32375*	Closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 26-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ([,) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑦)})
Theorem	icoreresf 32376	Closed-below, open-above intervals of reals map to subsets of reals. (Contributed by ML, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ([,) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ)):(ℝ × ℝ)⟶𝒫 ℝ
Theorem	icoreval 32377*	Value of the closed-below, open-above interval function on reals. (Contributed by ML, 26-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴[,)𝐵) = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝐵)})
Theorem	icoreelrnab 32378*	Elementhood in the set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℝ 𝑋 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)})
Theorem	isbasisrelowllem1 32379*	Lemma for isbasisrelowl 32382. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)}) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑑 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑐 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑑)})) ∧ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏 ≤ 𝑑)) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	isbasisrelowllem2 32380*	Lemma for isbasisrelowl 32382. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)}) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑑 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑐 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑑)})) ∧ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑑 ≤ 𝑏)) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	icoreclin 32381*	The set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals is closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	isbasisrelowl 32382	The set of all closed-below, open-above intervals of reals form a basis. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐼 ∈ TopBases
Theorem	icoreunrn 32383	The union of all closed-below, open-above intervals of reals is the set of reals. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ ℝ = ∪ 𝐼
Theorem	istoprelowl 32384	The set of all closed-below, open-above intervals of reals generate a topology on the reals. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ (topGen‘𝐼) ∈ (TopOn‘ℝ)
Theorem	icoreelrn 32385*	A class abstraction which is an element of the set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝐵)} ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	iooelexlt 32386*	An element of an open interval is not its smallest element. (Contributed by ML, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵)𝑦 < 𝑋)
Theorem	relowlssretop 32387	The lower limit topology on the reals is finer than the standard topology. (Contributed by ML, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ (topGen‘ran (,)) ⊆ (topGen‘𝐼)
Theorem	relowlpssretop 32388	The lower limit topology on the reals is strictly finer than the standard topology. (Contributed by ML, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ (topGen‘ran (,)) ⊊ (topGen‘𝐼)
Theorem	sucneqond 32389	Inequality of an ordinal set with its successor. Does not use the axiom of regularity. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = suc 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ On)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
Theorem	sucneqoni 32390	Inequality of an ordinal set with its successor. Does not use the axiom of regularity. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑋 = suc 𝑌    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌
Theorem	onsucuni3 32391	If an ordinal number has a predecessor, then it is successor of that predecessor. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	1oequni2o 32392	The ordinal number 1𝑜 is the predecessor of the ordinal number 2𝑜. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 1𝑜 = ∪ 2𝑜
Theorem	rdgsucuni 32393	If an ordinal number has a predecessor, the value of the recursive definition generator at that number in terms of its predecessor. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐵) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘𝐵) = (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘∪ 𝐵)))
Theorem	rdgeqoa 32394	If a recursive function with an initial value 𝐴 at step 𝑁 is equal to itself with an initial value 𝐵 at step 𝑀, then every finite number of successor steps will also be equal. (Contributed by ML, 21-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ On ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ω) → ((rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑁) = (rec(𝐹, 𝐵)‘𝑀) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘(𝑁 +𝑜 𝑋)) = (rec(𝐹, 𝐵)‘(𝑀 +𝑜 𝑋))))
Theorem	elxp8 32395	Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp7 7092. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (V × 𝐶)))
Syntax	cfinxp 32396	Extend the definition of a class to include Cartesian exponentiation.
class (𝑈↑↑𝑁)
Definition	df-finxp 32397*	Define Cartesian exponentiation on a class. Note that this definition is limited to finite exponents, since it is defined using nested ordered pairs. If tuples of infinite length are needed, or if they might be needed in the future, use df-ixp 7795 or df-map 7746 instead. The main advantage of this definition is that it integrates better with functions and relations. For example if 𝑅 is a subset of (𝐴↑↑2𝑜), then df-br 4584 can be used on it, and df-fv 5812 can also be used, and so on. It's also worth keeping in mind that ((𝑈↑↑𝑀) × (𝑈↑↑𝑁)) is generally not equal to (𝑈↑↑(𝑀 +𝑜 𝑁)). This definition is technical. Use finxp1o 32405 and finxpsuc 32411 for a more standard recursive experience. (Contributed by ML, 16-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝑈↑↑𝑁) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ ∅ = (rec((𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1𝑜 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), ⟨∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)⟩, ⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩))), ⟨𝑁, 𝑦⟩)‘𝑁))}
Theorem	dffinxpf 32398*	This theorem is the same as the definition df-finxp 32397, except that the large function is replaced by a class variable for brevity. (Contributed by ML, 24-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1𝑜 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), ⟨∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)⟩, ⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈↑↑𝑁) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ ∅ = (rec(𝐹, ⟨𝑁, 𝑦⟩)‘𝑁))}
Theorem	finxpeq1 32399	Equality theorem for Cartesian exponentiation. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝑈 = 𝑉 → (𝑈↑↑𝑁) = (𝑉↑↑𝑁))
Theorem	finxpeq2 32400	Equality theorem for Cartesian exponentiation. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝑀 = 𝑁 → (𝑈↑↑𝑀) = (𝑈↑↑𝑁))