Theorem wepwso 36631

Description: A well-ordering induces a strict ordering on the power set. EDITORIAL: when well-orderings are set like, this can be strengthened to remove 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
wepwso.t	⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wepwso	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑇(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem wepwso

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2onn 7607	. . . . 5 ⊢ 2𝑜 ∈ ω
2		nnord 6965	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2𝑜 ∈ ω → Ord 2𝑜)
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ Ord 2𝑜
4		ordwe 5653	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 2𝑜 → E We 2𝑜)
5		weso 5029	. . . 4 ⊢ ( E We 2𝑜 → E Or 2𝑜)
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ E Or 2𝑜
7		eqid 2610	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}
8	7	wemapso 8339	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ E Or 2𝑜) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴))
9	6, 8	mp3an3 1405	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴))
10		elex 3185	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
11		wepwso.t	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}
12		eqid 2610	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1𝑜})) = (𝑎 ∈ (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1𝑜}))
13	11, 7, 12	wepwsolem 36630	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝑎 ∈ (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1𝑜})) Isom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}, 𝑇((2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴))
14		isoso 6498	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1𝑜})) Isom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}, 𝑇((2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
15	10, 13, 14	3syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
16	15	adantr 480	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
17	9, 16	mpbid 221	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 195   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977  ∀wral 2896  ∃wrex 2897  Vcvv 3173  𝒫 cpw 4108  {csn 4125   class class class wbr 4583  {copab 4642   ↦ cmpt 4643   E cep 4947   Or wor 4958   We wwe 4996  ^◡ccnv 5037   “ cima 5041  Ord word 5639  ‘cfv 5804   Isom wiso 5805  (class class class)co 6549  ωcom 6957  1_𝑜c1o 7440  2_𝑜c2o 7441   ↑_𝑚 cmap 7744

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-8 1979  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-rep 4699  ax-sep 4709  ax-nul 4717  ax-pow 4769  ax-pr 4833  ax-un 6847

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3or 1032  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-eu 2462  df-mo 2463  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ne 2782  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-reu 2903  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-sbc 3403  df-csb 3500  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-pss 3556  df-nul 3875  df-if 4037  df-pw 4110  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128  df-tp 4130  df-op 4132  df-uni 4373  df-iun 4457  df-br 4584  df-opab 4644  df-mpt 4645  df-tr 4681  df-eprel 4949  df-id 4953  df-po 4959  df-so 4960  df-fr 4997  df-we 4999  df-xp 5044  df-rel 5045  df-cnv 5046  df-co 5047  df-dm 5048  df-rn 5049  df-res 5050  df-ima 5051  df-ord 5643  df-on 5644  df-lim 5645  df-suc 5646  df-iota 5768  df-fun 5806  df-fn 5807  df-f 5808  df-f1 5809  df-fo 5810  df-f1o 5811  df-fv 5812  df-isom 5813  df-ov 6552  df-oprab 6553  df-mpt2 6554  df-om 6958  df-1st 7059  df-2nd 7060  df-1o 7447  df-2o 7448  df-map 7746

This theorem is referenced by:  aomclem1  36642