Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > isf32lem3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Lemma for isfin3-2 9072. Being a chain, difference sets are disjoint (one case). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
isf32lem.a | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺) |
isf32lem.b | ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) |
isf32lem.c | ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
isf32lem3 | ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) ∩ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) = ∅) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | eldifi 3694 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐴)) | |
2 | simpll 786 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝐴 ∈ ω) | |
3 | peano2 6978 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → suc 𝐵 ∈ ω) | |
4 | 3 | ad2antlr 759 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → suc 𝐵 ∈ ω) |
5 | nnord 6965 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → Ord 𝐴) | |
6 | 5 | ad2antrr 758 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → Ord 𝐴) |
7 | simprl 790 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) | |
8 | ordsucss 6910 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)) | |
9 | 6, 7, 8 | sylc 63 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → suc 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) |
10 | simprr 792 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝜑) | |
11 | isf32lem.a | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺) | |
12 | isf32lem.b | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) | |
13 | isf32lem.c | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹) | |
14 | 11, 12, 13 | isf32lem1 9058 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (suc 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵)) |
15 | 2, 4, 9, 10, 14 | syl22anc 1319 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵)) |
16 | 15 | sseld 3567 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝑎 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐴) → 𝑎 ∈ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) |
17 | elndif 3696 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵) → ¬ 𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) | |
18 | 1, 16, 17 | syl56 35 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵)))) |
19 | 18 | ralrimiv 2948 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → ∀𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) ¬ 𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) |
20 | disj 3969 | . 2 ⊢ ((((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) ∩ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) ¬ 𝑎 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) | |
21 | 19, 20 | sylibr 223 | 1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (((𝐹‘𝐴) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) ∩ ((𝐹‘𝐵) ∖ (𝐹‘suc 𝐵))) = ∅) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 383 = wceq 1475 ∈ wcel 1977 ∀wral 2896 ∖ cdif 3537 ∩ cin 3539 ⊆ wss 3540 ∅c0 3874 𝒫 cpw 4108 ∩ cint 4410 ran crn 5039 Ord word 5639 suc csuc 5642 ⟶wf 5800 ‘cfv 5804 ωcom 6957 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1713 ax-4 1728 ax-5 1827 ax-6 1875 ax-7 1922 ax-8 1979 ax-9 1986 ax-10 2006 ax-11 2021 ax-12 2034 ax-13 2234 ax-ext 2590 ax-sep 4709 ax-nul 4717 ax-pr 4833 ax-un 6847 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 196 df-or 384 df-an 385 df-3or 1032 df-3an 1033 df-tru 1478 df-ex 1696 df-nf 1701 df-sb 1868 df-eu 2462 df-mo 2463 df-clab 2597 df-cleq 2603 df-clel 2606 df-nfc 2740 df-ne 2782 df-ral 2901 df-rex 2902 df-rab 2905 df-v 3175 df-sbc 3403 df-dif 3543 df-un 3545 df-in 3547 df-ss 3554 df-pss 3556 df-nul 3875 df-if 4037 df-pw 4110 df-sn 4126 df-pr 4128 df-tp 4130 df-op 4132 df-uni 4373 df-br 4584 df-opab 4644 df-tr 4681 df-eprel 4949 df-po 4959 df-so 4960 df-fr 4997 df-we 4999 df-ord 5643 df-on 5644 df-lim 5645 df-suc 5646 df-iota 5768 df-fv 5812 df-om 6958 |
This theorem is referenced by: isf32lem4 9061 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |