Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 2falsed | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Two falsehoods are equivalent (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2013.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
2falsed.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) |
2falsed.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
2falsed | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2falsed.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) | |
2 | 1 | pm2.21d 117 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
3 | 2falsed.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒) | |
4 | 3 | pm2.21d 117 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)) |
5 | 2, 4 | impbid 201 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 195 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 196 |
This theorem is referenced by: pm5.21ni 366 bianfd 963 sbcrextOLD 3479 sbcel12 3935 sbcne12 3938 sbcel2 3941 sbcbr 4637 csbxp 5123 smoord 7349 tfr2b 7379 axrepnd 9295 hasheq0 13015 m1exp1 14931 sadcadd 15018 stdbdxmet 22130 iccpnfcnv 22551 cxple2 24243 mirbtwnhl 25375 uvtx01vtx 26020 eupath2lem1 26504 isoun 28862 1smat1 29198 xrge0iifcnv 29307 sgn0bi 29936 signswch 29964 fz0n 30869 hfext 31460 unccur 32562 ntrneiel2 37404 ntrneik4w 37418 uvtxa01vtx 40624 eupth2lem1 41386 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |