ltgov - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ltgov		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ltgov 25292

Description: Strict "shorter than" geometric relation between segments. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
legval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
legval.d	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
legval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
legval.l	⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)
legval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
legso.a	⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))
legso.f	⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )
legso.l	⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )
legso.d	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − )
ltgov.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
ltgov.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ltgov	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))

**Proof of Theorem ltgov**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		legso.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )
2	1	breqi 4589	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵)(( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )(𝐶 − 𝐷))
3		brdif 4635	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)(( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )(𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
4	2, 3	bitri 263	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
5		ovex 6577	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∈ V
6	5	brres 5323	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸))
7	6	anbi1i 727	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 − 𝐵)( ≤ ↾ 𝐸)(𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
8		anass 679	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
9	4, 7, 8	3bitri 285	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
10	5	ideq 5196	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))
11	10	necon3bbii 2829	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))
12		ltgov.a	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
13		ltgov.b	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
14		legso.f	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )
15		legso.d	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − )
16	12, 13, 14, 15	elovimad 6591	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃)))
17		legso.a	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))
18	16, 17	syl6eleqr 2699	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸)
19	18	biantrurd 528	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
20	11, 19	syl5rbbr 274	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷)))
21	20	anbi2d 736	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ 𝐸 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 − 𝐵) I (𝐶 − 𝐷))) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
22	9, 21	syl5bb 271	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 195 ∧ wa 383 = wceq 1475 ∈ wcel 1977 ≠ wne 2780 ∖ cdif 3537 ⊆ wss 3540 class class class wbr 4583 I cid 4948 × cxp 5036 dom cdm 5038 ↾ cres 5040 “ cima 5041 Fun wfun 5798 ‘cfv 5804 (class class class)co 6549 Basecbs 15695 distcds 15777 TarskiGcstrkg 25129 Itvcitv 25135 ≤Gcleg 25277

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1713 ax-4 1728 ax-5 1827 ax-6 1875 ax-7 1922 ax-9 1986 ax-10 2006 ax-11 2021 ax-12 2034 ax-13 2234 ax-ext 2590 ax-sep 4709 ax-nul 4717 ax-pr 4833

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 196 df-or 384 df-an 385 df-3an 1033 df-tru 1478 df-ex 1696 df-nf 1701 df-sb 1868 df-eu 2462 df-mo 2463 df-clab 2597 df-cleq 2603 df-clel 2606 df-nfc 2740 df-ne 2782 df-ral 2901 df-rex 2902 df-rab 2905 df-v 3175 df-sbc 3403 df-dif 3543 df-un 3545 df-in 3547 df-ss 3554 df-nul 3875 df-if 4037 df-sn 4126 df-pr 4128 df-op 4132 df-uni 4373 df-br 4584 df-opab 4644 df-id 4953 df-xp 5044 df-rel 5045 df-cnv 5046 df-co 5047 df-dm 5048 df-rn 5049 df-res 5050 df-ima 5051 df-iota 5768 df-fun 5806 df-fn 5807 df-fv 5812 df-ov 6552

This theorem is referenced by: legov3 25293 legso 25294

W3C validator