Theorem f1omvdmvd 17686

Description: A permutation of any class moves a point which is moved to a different point which is moved. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
f1omvdmvd	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∖ {𝑋}))

Proof of Theorem f1omvdmvd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 476	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ))
2		f1ofn 6051	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
3	2	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
4		difss 3699	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ 𝐹
5		dmss 5245	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ 𝐹 → dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ dom 𝐹)
6	4, 5	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ dom 𝐹
7		f1odm 6054	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
8	6, 7	syl5sseq 3616	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ 𝐴)
9	8	sselda 3568	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
10		fnelnfp 6348	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋))
11	3, 9, 10	syl2anc 691	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋))
12	1, 11	mpbid 221	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋)
13		f1of1 6049	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐴)
14	13	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐴)
15		f1of 6050	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐴)
16	15	adantr 480	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐴)
17	16, 9	ffvelrnd 6268	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)
18		f1fveq 6420	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐴 ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋))
19	14, 17, 9, 18	syl12anc 1316	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → ((𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋))
20	19	necon3bid 2826	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → ((𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋))
21	12, 20	mpbird 246	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑋))
22		fnelnfp 6348	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑋)))
23	3, 17, 22	syl2anc 691	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑋)))
24	21, 23	mpbird 246	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ))
25		eldifsn 4260	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∖ {𝑋}) ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋))
26	24, 12, 25	sylanbrc 695	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∖ {𝑋}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 195   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977   ≠ wne 2780   ∖ cdif 3537   ⊆ wss 3540  {csn 4125   I cid 4948  dom cdm 5038   Fn wfn 5799  ⟶wf 5800  –1-1→wf1 5801  –1-1-onto→wf1o 5803  ‘cfv 5804

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-sep 4709  ax-nul 4717  ax-pr 4833

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-eu 2462  df-mo 2463  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ne 2782  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-sbc 3403  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-nul 3875  df-if 4037  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128  df-op 4132  df-uni 4373  df-br 4584  df-opab 4644  df-id 4953  df-xp 5044  df-rel 5045  df-cnv 5046  df-co 5047  df-dm 5048  df-rn 5049  df-res 5050  df-iota 5768  df-fun 5806  df-fn 5807  df-f 5808  df-f1 5809  df-f1o 5811  df-fv 5812

This theorem is referenced by:  f1otrspeq  17690  symggen  17713