Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > indislem | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: A lemma to eliminate some sethood hypotheses when dealing with the indiscrete topology. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
indislem | ⊢ {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | fvi 6165 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝐴) = 𝐴) | |
2 | 1 | preq2d 4219 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴}) |
3 | dfsn2 4138 | . . . 4 ⊢ {∅} = {∅, ∅} | |
4 | 3 | eqcomi 2619 | . . 3 ⊢ {∅, ∅} = {∅} |
5 | fvprc 6097 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝐴) = ∅) | |
6 | 5 | preq2d 4219 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, ∅}) |
7 | prprc2 4244 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, 𝐴} = {∅}) | |
8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3eqtr4a 2670 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴}) |
9 | 2, 8 | pm2.61i 175 | 1 ⊢ {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 = wceq 1475 ∈ wcel 1977 Vcvv 3173 ∅c0 3874 {csn 4125 {cpr 4127 I cid 4948 ‘cfv 5804 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1713 ax-4 1728 ax-5 1827 ax-6 1875 ax-7 1922 ax-8 1979 ax-9 1986 ax-10 2006 ax-11 2021 ax-12 2034 ax-13 2234 ax-ext 2590 ax-sep 4709 ax-nul 4717 ax-pow 4769 ax-pr 4833 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 196 df-or 384 df-an 385 df-3an 1033 df-tru 1478 df-ex 1696 df-nf 1701 df-sb 1868 df-eu 2462 df-mo 2463 df-clab 2597 df-cleq 2603 df-clel 2606 df-nfc 2740 df-ral 2901 df-rex 2902 df-rab 2905 df-v 3175 df-sbc 3403 df-dif 3543 df-un 3545 df-in 3547 df-ss 3554 df-nul 3875 df-if 4037 df-sn 4126 df-pr 4128 df-op 4132 df-uni 4373 df-br 4584 df-opab 4644 df-id 4953 df-xp 5044 df-rel 5045 df-cnv 5046 df-co 5047 df-dm 5048 df-iota 5768 df-fun 5806 df-fv 5812 |
This theorem is referenced by: indistop 20616 indisuni 20617 indiscld 20705 indiscon 21031 txindis 21247 hmphindis 21410 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |