Theorem caragenval 39383

Description: The sigma-algebra generated by an outer measure. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
caragenval	⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → (CaraGen‘𝑂) = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})

Distinct variable group:   𝑂,𝑎,𝑒

Proof of Theorem caragenval

Dummy variable 𝑜 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → 𝑂 ∈ OutMeas)
2		dmexg 6989	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
3		uniexg 6853	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom 𝑂 ∈ V → ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
4	2, 3	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
5		pwexg 4776	. . . 4 ⊢ (∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V → 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
6	4, 5	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
7		rabexg 4739	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V → {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)} ∈ V)
8	6, 7	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)} ∈ V)
9		dmeq 5246	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → dom 𝑜 = dom 𝑂)
10	9	unieqd 4382	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → ∪ dom 𝑜 = ∪ dom 𝑂)
11	10	pweqd 4113	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜 = 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂)
12	11	raleqdv 3121	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎)))
13		fveq1 6102	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) = (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)))
14		fveq1 6102	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒)) = (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒)))
15	13, 14	oveq12d 6567	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → ((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = ((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))))
16		fveq1 6102	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (𝑜‘𝑎) = (𝑂‘𝑎))
17	15, 16	eqeq12d 2625	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)))
18	17	ralbidv 2969	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)))
19	12, 18	bitrd 267	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)))
20	11, 19	rabeqbidv 3168	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎)} = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})
21		df-caragen 39382	. . 3 ⊢ CaraGen = (𝑜 ∈ OutMeas ↦ {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎)})
22	20, 21	fvmptg 6189	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ OutMeas ∧ {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)} ∈ V) → (CaraGen‘𝑂) = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})
23	1, 8, 22	syl2anc 691	1 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → (CaraGen‘𝑂) = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977  ∀wral 2896  {crab 2900  Vcvv 3173   ∖ cdif 3537   ∩ cin 3539  𝒫 cpw 4108  ∪ cuni 4372  dom cdm 5038  ‘cfv 5804  (class class class)co 6549   +_𝑒 cxad 11820  OutMeascome 39379  CaraGenccaragen 39381

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-8 1979  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-sep 4709  ax-nul 4717  ax-pow 4769  ax-pr 4833  ax-un 6847

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-eu 2462  df-mo 2463  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-sbc 3403  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-nul 3875  df-if 4037  df-pw 4110  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128  df-op 4132  df-uni 4373  df-br 4584  df-opab 4644  df-mpt 4645  df-id 4953  df-xp 5044  df-rel 5045  df-cnv 5046  df-co 5047  df-dm 5048  df-rn 5049  df-iota 5768  df-fun 5806  df-fv 5812  df-ov 6552  df-caragen 39382

This theorem is referenced by:  caragenel  39385  caragenss  39394  caratheodory  39418