MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  2bornot2b Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem 2bornot2b 26712
Description: The law of excluded middle. Act III, Theorem 1 of Shakespeare, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark (1602). Its author leaves its proof as an exercise for the reader - "To be, or not to be: that is the question" - starting a trend that has become standard in modern-day textbooks, serving to make the frustrated reader feel inferior, or in some cases to mask the fact that the author does not know its solution. (Contributed by Prof. Loof Lirpa, 1-Apr-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
2bornot2b (2 · 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 2 · 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem 2bornot2b
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-1 6 . . 3 (¬ 2 · 𝐵 → (2 · 𝐵 → ¬ 2 · 𝐵))
2 ax-1 6 . . 3 (¬ 2 · 𝐵 → ((2 · 𝐵 → ¬ 2 · 𝐵) → ¬ 2 · 𝐵))
31, 2mpd 15 . 2 (¬ 2 · 𝐵 → ¬ 2 · 𝐵)
4 df-or 384 . 2 ((2 · 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 2 · 𝐵) ↔ (¬ 2 · 𝐵 → ¬ 2 · 𝐵))
53, 4mpbir 220 1 (2 · 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 2 · 𝐵)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wo 382   class class class wbr 4583   · cmul 9820  2c2 10947
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator