Theorem supeq2 8237

Description: Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supeq2	⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅))

Proof of Theorem supeq2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeq 3166	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
2		raleq 3115	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
3	2	anbi2d 736	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))))
4	3	rabbidv 3164	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
5	1, 4	eqtrd 2644	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
6	5	unieqd 4382	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
7		df-sup 8231	. 2 ⊢ sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))}
8		df-sup 8231	. 2 ⊢ sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))}
9	6, 7, 8	3eqtr4g 2669	1 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1475  ∀wral 2896  ∃wrex 2897  {crab 2900  ∪ cuni 4372   class class class wbr 4583  supcsup 8229

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-rab 2905  df-uni 4373  df-sup 8231

This theorem is referenced by:  infeq2  8268