Theorem edgupgr 25808

Description: Properties of an edge of a pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 8-Nov-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
edgupgr	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)) → (𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐸 ≠ ∅ ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2))

Proof of Theorem edgupgr

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		edgaval 25794	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺))
2	1	eleq2d 2673	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐸 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺) ↔ 𝐸 ∈ ran (iEdg‘𝐺)))
3		eqid 2610	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝐺) = (Vtx‘𝐺)
4		eqid 2610	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	upgrf 25753	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)⟶{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (#‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
6		frn 5966	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)⟶{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (#‘𝑥) ≤ 2} → ran (iEdg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (#‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
7	5, 6	syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ran (iEdg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (#‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
8	7	sseld 3567	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐸 ∈ ran (iEdg‘𝐺) → 𝐸 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (#‘𝑥) ≤ 2}))
9		fveq2 6103	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐸 → (#‘𝑥) = (#‘𝐸))
10	9	breq1d 4593	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐸 → ((#‘𝑥) ≤ 2 ↔ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2))
11	10	elrab 3331	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐸 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (#‘𝑥) ≤ 2} ↔ (𝐸 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2))
12		eldifsn 4260	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐸 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ↔ (𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐸 ≠ ∅))
13	12	biimpi 205	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐸 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) → (𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐸 ≠ ∅))
14	13	anim1i 590	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2) → ((𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐸 ≠ ∅) ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2))
15		df-3an 1033	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐸 ≠ ∅ ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2) ↔ ((𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐸 ≠ ∅) ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2))
16	14, 15	sylibr 223	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2) → (𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐸 ≠ ∅ ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2))
17	16	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ((𝐸 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2) → (𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐸 ≠ ∅ ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2)))
18	11, 17	syl5bi 231	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐸 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (#‘𝑥) ≤ 2} → (𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐸 ≠ ∅ ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2)))
19	8, 18	syld 46	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐸 ∈ ran (iEdg‘𝐺) → (𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐸 ≠ ∅ ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2)))
20	2, 19	sylbid 229	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐸 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺) → (𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐸 ≠ ∅ ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2)))
21	20	imp 444	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)) → (𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐸 ≠ ∅ ∧ (#‘𝐸) ≤ 2))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 383   ∧ w3a 1031   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977   ≠ wne 2780  {crab 2900   ∖ cdif 3537   ⊆ wss 3540  ∅c0 3874  𝒫 cpw 4108  {csn 4125   class class class wbr 4583  dom cdm 5038  ran crn 5039  ⟶wf 5800  ‘cfv 5804   ≤ cle 9954  2c2 10947  #chash 12979  Vtxcvtx 25673  iEdgciedg 25674   UPGraph cupgr 25747  Edgcedga 25792

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-8 1979  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-sep 4709  ax-nul 4717  ax-pr 4833  ax-un 6847

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-eu 2462  df-mo 2463  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ne 2782  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-sbc 3403  df-csb 3500  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-nul 3875  df-if 4037  df-pw 4110  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128  df-op 4132  df-uni 4373  df-br 4584  df-opab 4644  df-mpt 4645  df-id 4953  df-xp 5044  df-rel 5045  df-cnv 5046  df-co 5047  df-dm 5048  df-rn 5049  df-iota 5768  df-fun 5806  df-fn 5807  df-f 5808  df-fv 5812  df-upgr 25749  df-edga 25793

This theorem is referenced by:  upgrres1  40532