Theorem difopab 5175

Description: The difference of two ordered-pair abstractions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
difopab	⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem difopab

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopab 5169	. . 3 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
2		reldif 5161	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → Rel ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}))
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ Rel ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})
4		relopab 5169	. 2 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}
5		sbcan 3445	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]([𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓))
6		sbcan 3445	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓))
7	6	sbcbii 3458	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]([𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓))
8		opelopabsb 4910	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
9		vex 3176	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
10		sbcng 3443	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ V → ([𝑧 / 𝑥] ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓))
11	9, 10	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥] ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
12		vex 3176	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
13		sbcng 3443	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ V → ([𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓))
14	12, 13	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
15	14	sbcbii 3458	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥] ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
16		opelopabsb 4910	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
17	16	notbii 309	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ¬ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
18	11, 15, 17	3bitr4ri 292	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓)
19	8, 18	anbi12i 729	. . . 4 ⊢ ((⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓))
20	5, 7, 19	3bitr4ri 292	. . 3 ⊢ ((⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
21		eldif 3550	. . 3 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}))
22		opelopabsb 4910	. . 3 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
23	20, 21, 22	3bitr4i 291	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)})
24	3, 4, 23	eqrelriiv 5137	1 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 195   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977  Vcvv 3173  [wsbc 3402   ∖ cdif 3537  ⟨cop 4131  {copab 4642  Rel wrel 5043

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-sep 4709  ax-nul 4717  ax-pr 4833

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-eu 2462  df-mo 2463  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ne 2782  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-sbc 3403  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-nul 3875  df-if 4037  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128  df-op 4132  df-opab 4644  df-xp 5044  df-rel 5045

This theorem is referenced by: (None)