Theorem cbvrexcsf 3532

Description: A more general version of cbvrexf 3142 that has no distinct variable restrictions. Changes bound variables using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvralcsf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
cbvralcsf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
cbvralcsf.3	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
cbvralcsf.4	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
cbvralcsf.5	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
cbvralcsf.6	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrexcsf	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem cbvrexcsf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbvralcsf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
2		cbvralcsf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3		cbvralcsf.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
4	3	nfn 1768	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 ¬ 𝜑
5		cbvralcsf.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
6	5	nfn 1768	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝜓
7		cbvralcsf.5	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
8		cbvralcsf.6	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
9	8	notbid 307	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
10	1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9	cbvralcsf 3531	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜓)
11	10	notbii 309	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜓)
12		dfrex2 2979	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑)
13		dfrex2 2979	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜓)
14	11, 12, 13	3bitr4i 291	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 195   = wceq 1475  Ⅎwnf 1699  Ⅎwnfc 2738  ∀wral 2896  ∃wrex 2897

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-sbc 3403  df-csb 3500

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvrexv2  3536