Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 3mix3d | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Deduction introducing triple disjunction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3mixd.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3mix3d | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3mixd.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | |
2 | 3mix3 1225 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜓)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | syl 17 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∨ w3o 1030 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 196 df-or 384 df-3or 1032 |
This theorem is referenced by: funtpgOLD 5857 elfiun 8219 nnnegz 11257 hashv01gt1 12995 lcmfunsnlem2lem2 15190 cshwshashlem1 15640 dyaddisjlem 23169 zabsle1 24821 btwncolg3 25252 btwnlng3 25316 frgra3vlem2 26528 3vfriswmgra 26532 frgraregorufr0 26579 2spotdisj 26588 sltsolem1 31067 nodense 31088 fnwe2lem3 36640 frgr3vlem2 41444 3vfriswmgr 41448 frgrregorufr0 41489 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |