Theorem undisjrab 37527

Description: Union of two disjoint restricted class abstractions; compare unrab 3857. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
undisjrab	⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})

Proof of Theorem undisjrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeq0 3911	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2		df-nan 1440	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
3		nanorxor 37526	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
4	2, 3	bitr3i 265	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
5	4	ralbii 2963	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
6		rabbi 3097	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)) ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
7	1, 5, 6	3bitri 285	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
8		inrab 3858	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
9	8	eqeq1i 2615	. 2 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = ∅)
10		unrab 3857	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}
11	10	eqeq1i 2615	. 2 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)} ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
12	7, 9, 11	3bitr4i 291	1 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 195   ∨ wo 382   ∧ wa 383   ⊼ wnan 1439   ⊻ wxo 1456   = wceq 1475  ∀wral 2896  {crab 2900   ∪ cun 3538   ∩ cin 3539  ∅c0 3874

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-nan 1440  df-xor 1457  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ral 2901  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-nul 3875

This theorem is referenced by: (None)