Theorem ifor 4085

Description: Rewrite a disjunction in an if statement as two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ifor	⊢ if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem ifor

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		iftrue 4042	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴)
2	1	orcs 408	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴)
3		iftrue 4042	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) = 𝐴)
4	2, 3	eqtr4d 2647	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)))
5		iffalse 4045	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) = if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))
6		biorf 419	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
7	6	ifbid 4058	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵))
8	5, 7	eqtr2d 2645	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)))
9	4, 8	pm2.61i 175	1 ⊢ if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∨ wo 382   = wceq 1475  ifcif 4036

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-if 4037

This theorem is referenced by:  cantnflem1d  8468  cantnflem1  8469