 Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  axc14 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem axc14 2360
 Description: Axiom ax-c14 33194 is redundant if we assume ax-5 1827. Remark 9.6 in [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of the preprint), regarding axiom scheme C14'. Note that 𝑤 is a dummy variable introduced in the proof. Its purpose is to satisfy the distinct variable requirements of dveel2 2359 and ax-5 1827. By the end of the proof it has vanished, and the final theorem has no distinct variable requirements. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
axc14 (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑥𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥𝑦)))

Proof of Theorem axc14
Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 hbn1 2007 . . . . 5 (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦)
2 dveel2 2359 . . . . 5 (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑤𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑤𝑦))
31, 2hbim1 2110 . . . 4 ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦𝑤𝑦) → ∀𝑧(¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦𝑤𝑦))
4 elequ1 1984 . . . . 5 (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (𝑤𝑦𝑥𝑦))
54imbi2d 329 . . . 4 (𝑤 = 𝑥 → ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦𝑤𝑦) ↔ (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦𝑥𝑦)))
63, 5dvelim 2325 . . 3 (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦𝑥𝑦) → ∀𝑧(¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦𝑥𝑦)))
7 nfa1 2015 . . . . 5 𝑧𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦
87nfn 1768 . . . 4 𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦
9819.21 2062 . . 3 (∀𝑧(¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦𝑥𝑦) ↔ (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥𝑦))
106, 9syl6ib 240 . 2 (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦𝑥𝑦) → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥𝑦)))
1110pm2.86d 105 1 (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑥𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥𝑦)))
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4  ∀wal 1473 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-8 1979  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701 This theorem is referenced by: (None)
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator