Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rspc2ev | GIF version |
Description: 2-variable restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1999.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspc2v.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) |
rspc2v.2 | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspc2ev | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rspc2v.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
2 | 1 | rspcev 2656 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒) |
3 | 2 | anim2i 324 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒)) |
4 | 3 | 3impb 1100 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒)) |
5 | rspc2v.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
6 | 5 | rexbidv 2327 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒)) |
7 | 6 | rspcev 2656 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑) |
8 | 4, 7 | syl 14 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 97 ↔ wb 98 ∧ w3a 885 = wceq 1243 ∈ wcel 1393 ∃wrex 2307 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-io 630 ax-5 1336 ax-7 1337 ax-gen 1338 ax-ie1 1382 ax-ie2 1383 ax-8 1395 ax-10 1396 ax-11 1397 ax-i12 1398 ax-bndl 1399 ax-4 1400 ax-17 1419 ax-i9 1423 ax-ial 1427 ax-i5r 1428 ax-ext 2022 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-3an 887 df-tru 1246 df-nf 1350 df-sb 1646 df-clab 2027 df-cleq 2033 df-clel 2036 df-nfc 2167 df-rex 2312 df-v 2559 |
This theorem is referenced by: rspc3ev 2666 opelxp 4374 rspceov 5547 2dom 6285 apreim 7594 addcn2 9831 mulcn2 9833 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |