ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  nfraldya Unicode version

Theorem nfraldya 2358
Description: Not-free for restricted universal quantification where  y and  A are distinct. See nfraldxy 2356 for a version with  x and  y distinct instead. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2018.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
nfraldya.2  |-  F/ y
ph
nfraldya.3  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x A )
nfraldya.4  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x ps )
Assertion
Ref Expression
nfraldya  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x A. y  e.  A  ps )
Distinct variable group:    y, A
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x, y)    ps( x, y)    A( x)

Proof of Theorem nfraldya
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-ral 2311 . 2  |-  ( A. y  e.  A  ps  <->  A. y ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )
)
2 sbim 1827 . . . . . 6  |-  ( [ z  /  y ] ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )  <->  ( [
z  /  y ] y  e.  A  ->  [ z  /  y ] ps ) )
3 clelsb3 2142 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( [ z  /  y ] y  e.  A  <->  z  e.  A )
43imbi1i 227 . . . . . 6  |-  ( ( [ z  /  y ] y  e.  A  ->  [ z  /  y ] ps )  <->  ( z  e.  A  ->  [ z  /  y ] ps ) )
52, 4bitri 173 . . . . 5  |-  ( [ z  /  y ] ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )  <->  ( z  e.  A  ->  [ z  /  y ] ps ) )
65albii 1359 . . . 4  |-  ( A. z [ z  /  y ] ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )  <->  A. z ( z  e.  A  ->  [ z  /  y ] ps ) )
7 nfv 1421 . . . . 5  |-  F/ z ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )
87sb8 1736 . . . 4  |-  ( A. y ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )  <->  A. z [ z  / 
y ] ( y  e.  A  ->  ps ) )
9 df-ral 2311 . . . 4  |-  ( A. z  e.  A  [
z  /  y ] ps  <->  A. z ( z  e.  A  ->  [ z  /  y ] ps ) )
106, 8, 93bitr4i 201 . . 3  |-  ( A. y ( y  e.  A  ->  ps )  <->  A. z  e.  A  [
z  /  y ] ps )
11 nfv 1421 . . . 4  |-  F/ z
ph
12 nfraldya.3 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  -> 
F/_ x A )
13 nfraldya.2 . . . . 5  |-  F/ y
ph
14 nfraldya.4 . . . . 5  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x ps )
1513, 14nfsbd 1851 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x [ z  /  y ] ps )
1611, 12, 15nfraldxy 2356 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x A. z  e.  A  [ z  /  y ] ps )
1710, 16nfxfrd 1364 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x A. y
( y  e.  A  ->  ps ) )
181, 17nfxfrd 1364 1  |-  ( ph  ->  F/ x A. y  e.  A  ps )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4   A.wal 1241   F/wnf 1349    e. wcel 1393   [wsb 1645   F/_wnfc 2165   A.wral 2306
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-ral 2311
This theorem is referenced by:  nfralya  2362
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator