Theorem iccid 8794

Description: A closed interval with identical lower and upper bounds is a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Jul-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iccid	|- ( A e. RR* -> ( A [,] A ) = { A } )

Proof of Theorem iccid

Dummy variable x is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elicc1 8793	. . . 4 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ A e. RR* ) -> ( x e. ( A [,] A ) <-> ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) ) )
2	1	anidms 377	. . 3 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x e. ( A [,] A ) <-> ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) ) )
3		xrlenlt 7084	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( A <_ x <-> -. x < A ) )
4		xrlenlt 7084	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( ( x e. RR* /\ A e. RR* ) -> ( x <_ A <-> -. A < x ) )
5	4	ancoms 255	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( x <_ A <-> -. A < x ) )
6		xrlttri3 8718	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 |- ( ( x e. RR* /\ A e. RR* ) -> ( x = A <-> ( -. x < A /\ -. A < x ) ) )
7	6	biimprd 147	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( ( x e. RR* /\ A e. RR* ) -> ( ( -. x < A /\ -. A < x ) -> x = A ) )
8	7	ancoms 255	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( ( -. x < A /\ -. A < x ) -> x = A ) )
9	8	expcomd 1330	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( -. A < x -> ( -. x < A -> x = A ) ) )
10	5, 9	sylbid 139	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( x <_ A -> ( -. x < A -> x = A ) ) )
11	10	com23 72	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( -. x < A -> ( x <_ A -> x = A ) ) )
12	3, 11	sylbid 139	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( A <_ x -> ( x <_ A -> x = A ) ) )
13	12	ex 108	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x e. RR* -> ( A <_ x -> ( x <_ A -> x = A ) ) ) )
14	13	3impd 1118	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) -> x = A ) )
15		eleq1a 2109	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x = A -> x e. RR* ) )
16		xrleid 8720	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A e. RR* -> A <_ A )
17		breq2 3768	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = A -> ( A <_ x <-> A <_ A ) )
18	16, 17	syl5ibrcom 146	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x = A -> A <_ x ) )
19		breq1 3767	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = A -> ( x <_ A <-> A <_ A ) )
20	16, 19	syl5ibrcom 146	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x = A -> x <_ A ) )
21	15, 18, 20	3jcad 1085	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x = A -> ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) ) )
22	14, 21	impbid 120	. . . 4 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) <-> x = A ) )
23		velsn 3392	. . . 4 |- ( x e. { A } <-> x = A )
24	22, 23	syl6bbr 187	. . 3 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) <-> x e. { A } ) )
25	2, 24	bitrd 177	. 2 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x e. ( A [,] A ) <-> x e. { A } ) )
26	25	eqrdv 2038	1 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( A [,] A ) = { A } )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   <-> wb 98   /\ w3a 885   = wceq 1243   e. wcel 1393   {csn 3375   class class class wbr 3764  (class class class)co 5512   RR*cxr 7059   < clt 7060   <_ cle 7061   [,]cicc 8760

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-13 1404  ax-14 1405  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-sep 3875  ax-pow 3927  ax-pr 3944  ax-un 4170  ax-setind 4262  ax-cnex 6975  ax-resscn 6976  ax-pre-ltirr 6996  ax-pre-apti 6999

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3or 886  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-fal 1249  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-eu 1903  df-mo 1904  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-ne 2206  df-nel 2207  df-ral 2311  df-rex 2312  df-rab 2315  df-v 2559  df-sbc 2765  df-dif 2920  df-un 2922  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931  df-pw 3361  df-sn 3381  df-pr 3382  df-op 3384  df-uni 3581  df-br 3765  df-opab 3819  df-id 4030  df-xp 4351  df-rel 4352  df-cnv 4353  df-co 4354  df-dm 4355  df-iota 4867  df-fun 4904  df-fv 4910  df-ov 5515  df-oprab 5516  df-mpt2 5517  df-pnf 7062  df-mnf 7063  df-xr 7064  df-ltxr 7065  df-le 7066  df-icc 8764

This theorem is referenced by: (None)