Theorem ax11v2 1701

Description: Recovery of ax11o 1703 from ax11v 1708 without using ax-11 1397. The hypothesis is even weaker than ax11v 1708, with z both distinct from x and not occurring in ph. Thus the hypothesis provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax11o 1703. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ax11v2.1	|- ( x = z -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax11v2	|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, z   y, z   ph, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)

Proof of Theorem ax11v2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		a9e 1586	. 2 |- E. z z = y
2		ax11v2.1	. . . . 5 |- ( x = z -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )
3		equequ2 1599	. . . . . . 7 |- ( z = y -> ( x = z <-> x = y ) )
4	3	adantl 262	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( -. A. x x = y /\ z = y ) -> ( x = z <-> x = y ) )
5		dveeq2 1696	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( z = y -> A. x z = y ) )
6	5	imp 115	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( -. A. x x = y /\ z = y ) -> A. x z = y )
7		hba1 1433	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( A. x z = y -> A. x A. x z = y )
8	3	imbi1d 220	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( z = y -> ( ( x = z -> ph ) <-> ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
9	8	sps 1430	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( A. x z = y -> ( ( x = z -> ph ) <-> ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
10	7, 9	albidh 1369	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( A. x z = y -> ( A. x ( x = z -> ph ) <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
11	6, 10	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( -. A. x x = y /\ z = y ) -> ( A. x ( x = z -> ph ) <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
12	11	imbi2d 219	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( -. A. x x = y /\ z = y ) -> ( ( ph -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) <-> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )
13	4, 12	imbi12d 223	. . . . 5 |- ( ( -. A. x x = y /\ z = y ) -> ( ( x = z -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) ) <-> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) ) )
14	2, 13	mpbii 136	. . . 4 |- ( ( -. A. x x = y /\ z = y ) -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )
15	14	ex 108	. . 3 |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( z = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) ) )
16	15	exlimdv 1700	. 2 |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( E. z z = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) ) )
17	1, 16	mpi 15	1 |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   <-> wb 98   A.wal 1241   E.wex 1381

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646

This theorem is referenced by:  ax11a2  1702