Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  zfauscl Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem zfauscl 4711
 Description: Separation Scheme (Aussonderung) using a class variable. To derive this from ax-sep 4709, we invoke the Axiom of Extensionality (indirectly via vtocl 3232), which is needed for the justification of class variable notation. If we omit the requirement that 𝑦 not occur in 𝜑, we can derive a contradiction, as notzfaus 4766 shows. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
zfauscl.1 𝐴 ∈ V
Assertion
Ref Expression
zfauscl 𝑦𝑥(𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝜑,𝑦
Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem zfauscl
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 zfauscl.1 . 2 𝐴 ∈ V
2 eleq2 2677 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑥𝑧𝑥𝐴))
32anbi1d 737 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥𝑧𝜑) ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)))
43bibi2d 331 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝑧𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑))))
54albidv 1836 . . 3 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥(𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝑧𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑))))
65exbidv 1837 . 2 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦𝑥(𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝑧𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑥(𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑))))
7 ax-sep 4709 . 2 𝑦𝑥(𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝑧𝜑))
81, 6, 7vtocl 3232 1 𝑦𝑥(𝑥𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑))
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 195   ∧ wa 383  ∀wal 1473   = wceq 1475  ∃wex 1695   ∈ wcel 1977  Vcvv 3173 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-12 2034  ax-ext 2590  ax-sep 4709 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-v 3175 This theorem is referenced by:  inex1  4727
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator