Theorem zfauscl 4711

Description: Separation Scheme (Aussonderung) using a class variable. To derive this from ax-sep 4709, we invoke the Axiom of Extensionality (indirectly via vtocl 3232), which is needed for the justification of class variable notation.

If we omit the requirement that 𝑦 not occur in 𝜑, we can derive a contradiction, as notzfaus 4766 shows. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
zfauscl.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
zfauscl	⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem zfauscl

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		zfauscl.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		eleq2 2677	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
3	2	anbi1d 737	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
4	3	bibi2d 331	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))))
5	4	albidv 1836	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))))
6	5	exbidv 1837	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))))
7		ax-sep 4709	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
8	1, 6, 7	vtocl 3232	1 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 195   ∧ wa 383  ∀wal 1473   = wceq 1475  ∃wex 1695   ∈ wcel 1977  Vcvv 3173

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-12 2034  ax-ext 2590  ax-sep 4709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-v 3175

This theorem is referenced by:  inex1  4727