Theorem xpiindi 5179

Description: Distributive law for Cartesian product over indexed intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xpiindi	⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐶

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem xpiindi

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relxp 5150	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)
2	1	rgenw 2908	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)
3		r19.2z 4012	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵))
4	2, 3	mpan2 703	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵))
5		reliin 5163	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel (𝐶 × 𝐵) → Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
6	4, 5	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
7		relxp 5150	. . 3 ⊢ Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
8	6, 7	jctil 558	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
9		r19.28zv 4018	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
10	9	bicomd 212	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
11		vex 3176	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
12		eliin 4461	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ V → (𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
13	11, 12	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
14	13	anbi2i 726	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
15		opelxp 5070	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
16	15	ralbii 2963	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
17	10, 14, 16	3bitr4g 302	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
18		opelxp 5070	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵))
19		opex 4859	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ V
20		eliin 4461	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ V → (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
21	19, 20	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐵))
22	17, 18, 21	3bitr4g 302	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
23	22	eqrelrdv2 5142	. 2 ⊢ (((Rel (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∧ Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
24	8, 23	mpancom 700	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 195   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977   ≠ wne 2780  ∀wral 2896  ∃wrex 2897  Vcvv 3173  ∅c0 3874  ⟨cop 4131  ∩ ciin 4456   × cxp 5036  Rel wrel 5043

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-sep 4709  ax-nul 4717  ax-pr 4833

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ne 2782  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-nul 3875  df-if 4037  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128  df-op 4132  df-iin 4458  df-opab 4644  df-xp 5044  df-rel 5045

This theorem is referenced by:  xpriindi  5180