Theorem ssdf 38273

Description: A sufficient condition for a subclass relationship. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Jan-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ssdf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ssdf.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssdf	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ssdf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssdf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ssdf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
3	2	ex 449	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4	1, 3	ralrimi 2940	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
5		dfss3 3558	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
6	4, 5	sylibr 223	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 383  Ⅎwnf 1699   ∈ wcel 1977  ∀wral 2896   ⊆ wss 3540

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-ral 2901  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554

This theorem is referenced by:  ssd  38278  smfaddlem2  39650  smfadd  39651  smfmullem4  39679  smfmul  39680