Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  spime Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem spime 2244
 Description: Existential introduction, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
spime.1 𝑥𝜑
spime.2 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))
Assertion
Ref Expression
spime (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)

Proof of Theorem spime
StepHypRef Expression
1 spime.1 . . . 4 𝑥𝜑
21a1i 11 . . 3 (⊤ → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)
3 spime.2 . . 3 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))
42, 3spimed 2243 . 2 (⊤ → (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓))
54trud 1484 1 (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ⊤wtru 1476  ∃wex 1695  Ⅎwnf 1699 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701 This theorem is referenced by:  spimev  2247  exnel  30952
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator