Theorem spcdv 3264

Description: Rule of specialization, using implicit substitution. Analogous to rspcdv 3285. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
spcimdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
spcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
spcdv	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem spcdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		spcimdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		spcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimpd 218	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
4	1, 3	spcimdv 3263	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 195   ∧ wa 383  ∀wal 1473   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-v 3175

This theorem is referenced by:  mrissmrcd  16123