Theorem rp-fakeuninass 36881

Description: A special case where a mixture of union and intersection appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by Richard Penner, 29-Feb-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rp-fakeuninass	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem rp-fakeuninass

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rp-fakeinunass 36880	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)))
2		eqcom 2617	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) ↔ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) = ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴))
3		incom 3767	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) = ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐶)
4		uncom 3719	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
5	4	ineq1i 3772	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶)
6	3, 5	eqtri 2632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶)
7		uncom 3719	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵))
8		incom 3767	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)
9	8	uneq2i 3726	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
10	7, 9	eqtri 2632	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
11	6, 10	eqeq12i 2624	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) = ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
12	1, 2, 11	3bitri 285	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 195   = wceq 1475   ∪ cun 3538   ∩ cin 3539   ⊆ wss 3540

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-v 3175  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554

This theorem is referenced by: (None)