MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  rmobida Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem rmobida 3106
Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
rmobida.1 𝑥𝜑
rmobida.2 ((𝜑𝑥𝐴) → (𝜓𝜒))
Assertion
Ref Expression
rmobida (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem rmobida
StepHypRef Expression
1 rmobida.1 . . 3 𝑥𝜑
2 rmobida.2 . . . 4 ((𝜑𝑥𝐴) → (𝜓𝜒))
32pm5.32da 671 . . 3 (𝜑 → ((𝑥𝐴𝜓) ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜒)))
41, 3mobid 2477 . 2 (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝜓) ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝜒)))
5 df-rmo 2904 . 2 (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝜓))
6 df-rmo 2904 . 2 (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝜒))
74, 5, 63bitr4g 302 1 (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜒))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 195  wa 383  wnf 1699  wcel 1977  ∃*wmo 2459  ∃*wrmo 2899
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-12 2034
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-an 385  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-eu 2462  df-mo 2463  df-rmo 2904
This theorem is referenced by:  rmobidva  3107  reuan  39829
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator