Theorem rabbia2 38309

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rabbia2.1	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabbia2	⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒}

Proof of Theorem rabbia2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabbia2.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))
2	1	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (⊤ → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
3	2	rabbidva2 3162	. 2 ⊢ (⊤ → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒})
4	3	trud 1484	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒}

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 195   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1475  ⊤wtru 1476   ∈ wcel 1977  {crab 2900

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-rab 2905

This theorem is referenced by:  smflim  39663