MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  pm2.65d Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem pm2.65d 186
Description: Deduction rule for proof by contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-May-2013.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
pm2.65d.1 (𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))
pm2.65d.2 (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒))
Assertion
Ref Expression
pm2.65d (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem pm2.65d
StepHypRef Expression
1 pm2.65d.2 . . 3 (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒))
2 pm2.65d.1 . . 3 (𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))
31, 2nsyld 153 . 2 (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜓))
43pm2.01d 180 1 (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8
This theorem is referenced by:  mtod  188  pm2.65da  598  unxpdomlem2  8050  cardlim  8681  winainflem  9394  winalim2  9397  discr  12863  sqrmo  13840  vdwnnlem3  15539  nmlno0lem  27032  nmlnop0iALT  28238  iooelexlt  32386
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator