Theorem mdandyvrx11 39808

Description: Given the exclusivities set in the hypotheses, there exist a proof where ch, th, ta, et exclude ze, si accordingly. (Contributed by Jarvin Udandy, 7-Sep-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mdandyvrx11.1	⊢ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜁)
mdandyvrx11.2	⊢ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜎)
mdandyvrx11.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)
mdandyvrx11.4	⊢ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓)
mdandyvrx11.5	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜑)
mdandyvrx11.6	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mdandyvrx11	⊢ ((((𝜒 ⊻ 𝜎) ∧ (𝜃 ⊻ 𝜎)) ∧ (𝜏 ⊻ 𝜁)) ∧ (𝜂 ⊻ 𝜎))

Proof of Theorem mdandyvrx11

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mdandyvrx11.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜎)
2		mdandyvrx11.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜁)
3		mdandyvrx11.3	. 2 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)
4		mdandyvrx11.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓)
5		mdandyvrx11.5	. 2 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜑)
6		mdandyvrx11.6	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ 𝜓)
7	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6	mdandyvrx4 39801	1 ⊢ ((((𝜒 ⊻ 𝜎) ∧ (𝜃 ⊻ 𝜎)) ∧ (𝜏 ⊻ 𝜁)) ∧ (𝜂 ⊻ 𝜎))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 195   ∧ wa 383   ⊻ wxo 1456

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-an 385  df-xor 1457

This theorem is referenced by: (None)