Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  isufl Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem isufl 21527
 Description: Define the (strong) ultrafilter lemma, parameterized over base sets. A set 𝑋 satisfies the ultrafilter lemma if every filter on 𝑋 is a subset of some ultrafilter. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Aug-2015.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
isufl (𝑋𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ UFL ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓𝑔))
Distinct variable group:   𝑓,𝑔,𝑋
Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑓,𝑔)

Proof of Theorem isufl
Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 fveq2 6103 . . 3 (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (Fil‘𝑥) = (Fil‘𝑋))
2 fveq2 6103 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (UFil‘𝑥) = (UFil‘𝑋))
32rexeqdv 3122 . . 3 (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑥)𝑓𝑔 ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓𝑔))
41, 3raleqbidv 3129 . 2 (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑥)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑥)𝑓𝑔 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓𝑔))
5 df-ufl 21516 . 2 UFL = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑥)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑥)𝑓𝑔}
64, 5elab2g 3322 1 (𝑋𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ UFL ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓𝑔))
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 195   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977  ∀wral 2896  ∃wrex 2897   ⊆ wss 3540  ‘cfv 5804  Filcfil 21459  UFilcufil 21513  UFLcufl 21514 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-nul 3875  df-if 4037  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128  df-op 4132  df-uni 4373  df-br 4584  df-iota 5768  df-fv 5812  df-ufl 21516 This theorem is referenced by:  ufli  21528  numufl  21529  ssufl  21532  ufldom  21576
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator