Theorem iotajust 5767

Description: Soundness justification theorem for df-iota 5768. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iotajust	⊢ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧   𝜑,𝑦   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem iotajust

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sneq 4135	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → {𝑦} = {𝑤})
2	1	eqeq2d 2620	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤}))
3	2	cbvabv 2734	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = {𝑤 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤}}
4		sneq 4135	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → {𝑤} = {𝑧})
5	4	eqeq2d 2620	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤} ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}))
6	5	cbvabv 2734	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤}} = {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}}
7	3, 6	eqtri 2632	. 2 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}}
8	7	unieqi 4381	1 ⊢ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}}

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1475  {cab 2596  {csn 4125  ∪ cuni 4372

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-rex 2902  df-sn 4126  df-uni 4373

This theorem is referenced by: (None)