Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  inrab2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem inrab2 3859
 Description: Intersection with a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2007.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
inrab2 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐵
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem inrab2
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-rab 2905 . . 3 {𝑥𝐴𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)}
2 abid1 2731 . . 3 𝐵 = {𝑥𝑥𝐵}
31, 2ineq12i 3774 . 2 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∩ 𝐵) = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥𝑥𝐵})
4 df-rab 2905 . . 3 {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}
5 inab 3854 . . . 4 ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥𝑥𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ 𝑥𝐵)}
6 elin 3758 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
76anbi1i 727 . . . . . 6 ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
8 an32 835 . . . . . 6 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ 𝑥𝐵))
97, 8bitri 263 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ 𝑥𝐵))
109abbii 2726 . . . 4 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ 𝑥𝐵)}
115, 10eqtr4i 2635 . . 3 ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥𝑥𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}
124, 11eqtr4i 2635 . 2 {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥𝑥𝐵})
133, 12eqtr4i 2635 1 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977  {cab 2596  {crab 2900   ∩ cin 3539 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-in 3547 This theorem is referenced by:  iooval2  12079  fzval2  12200  smuval2  15042  smueqlem  15050  dfphi2  15317  ordtrest  20816  ordtrest2lem  20817  ordtrestNEW  29295  ordtrest2NEWlem  29296  itg2addnclem2  32632  dmatALTbas  41984
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator