Mathbox for Jeff Madsen |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > idlnegcl | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: An ideal is closed under negation. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
idlnegcl.1 | ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) |
idlnegcl.2 | ⊢ 𝑁 = (inv‘𝐺) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
idlnegcl | ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐼) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | idlnegcl.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅) | |
2 | eqid 2610 | . . . 4 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran 𝐺 | |
3 | 1, 2 | idlss 32985 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) → 𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺) |
4 | ssel2 3563 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺) | |
5 | eqid 2610 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (2nd ‘𝑅) = (2nd ‘𝑅) | |
6 | idlnegcl.2 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑁 = (inv‘𝐺) | |
7 | eqid 2610 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)) = (GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)) | |
8 | 1, 5, 2, 6, 7 | rngonegmn1l 32910 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝑁‘𝐴) = ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴)) |
9 | 4, 8 | sylan2 490 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝑁‘𝐴) = ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴)) |
10 | 9 | anassrs 678 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘𝐴) = ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴)) |
11 | 3, 10 | syldanl 731 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘𝐴) = ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴)) |
12 | 1 | rneqi 5273 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran (1st ‘𝑅) |
13 | 12, 5, 7 | rngo1cl 32908 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)) ∈ ran 𝐺) |
14 | 1, 2, 6 | rngonegcl 32896 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)) ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺) |
15 | 13, 14 | mpdan 699 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺) |
16 | 15 | ad2antrr 758 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺) |
17 | 1, 5, 2 | idllmulcl 32989 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺)) → ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴) ∈ 𝐼) |
18 | 17 | anassrs 678 | . . 3 ⊢ ((((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅))) ∈ ran 𝐺) → ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴) ∈ 𝐼) |
19 | 16, 18 | mpdan 699 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → ((𝑁‘(GId‘(2nd ‘𝑅)))(2nd ‘𝑅)𝐴) ∈ 𝐼) |
20 | 11, 19 | eqeltrd 2688 | 1 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑁‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐼) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 383 = wceq 1475 ∈ wcel 1977 ⊆ wss 3540 ran crn 5039 ‘cfv 5804 (class class class)co 6549 1st c1st 7057 2nd c2nd 7058 GIdcgi 26728 invcgn 26729 RingOpscrngo 32863 Idlcidl 32976 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1713 ax-4 1728 ax-5 1827 ax-6 1875 ax-7 1922 ax-8 1979 ax-9 1986 ax-10 2006 ax-11 2021 ax-12 2034 ax-13 2234 ax-ext 2590 ax-rep 4699 ax-sep 4709 ax-nul 4717 ax-pow 4769 ax-pr 4833 ax-un 6847 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 196 df-or 384 df-an 385 df-3an 1033 df-tru 1478 df-ex 1696 df-nf 1701 df-sb 1868 df-eu 2462 df-mo 2463 df-clab 2597 df-cleq 2603 df-clel 2606 df-nfc 2740 df-ne 2782 df-ral 2901 df-rex 2902 df-reu 2903 df-rmo 2904 df-rab 2905 df-v 3175 df-sbc 3403 df-csb 3500 df-dif 3543 df-un 3545 df-in 3547 df-ss 3554 df-nul 3875 df-if 4037 df-pw 4110 df-sn 4126 df-pr 4128 df-op 4132 df-uni 4373 df-iun 4457 df-br 4584 df-opab 4644 df-mpt 4645 df-id 4953 df-xp 5044 df-rel 5045 df-cnv 5046 df-co 5047 df-dm 5048 df-rn 5049 df-res 5050 df-ima 5051 df-iota 5768 df-fun 5806 df-fn 5807 df-f 5808 df-f1 5809 df-fo 5810 df-f1o 5811 df-fv 5812 df-riota 6511 df-ov 6552 df-1st 7059 df-2nd 7060 df-grpo 26731 df-gid 26732 df-ginv 26733 df-ablo 26783 df-ass 32812 df-exid 32814 df-mgmOLD 32818 df-sgrOLD 32830 df-mndo 32836 df-rngo 32864 df-idl 32979 |
This theorem is referenced by: idlsubcl 32992 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |