Theorem elcnop 28100

Description: Property defining a continuous Hilbert space operator. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elcnop	⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ConOp ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝑧,𝑇

Proof of Theorem elcnop

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq1 6102	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑡‘𝑤) = (𝑇‘𝑤))
2		fveq1 6102	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑡‘𝑥) = (𝑇‘𝑥))
3	1, 2	oveq12d 6567	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥)) = ((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥)))
4	3	fveq2d 6107	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) = (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))))
5	4	breq1d 4593	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦 ↔ (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦))
6	5	imbi2d 329	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
7	6	rexralbidv 3040	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
8	7	2ralbidv 2972	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
9		df-cnop 28083	. . 3 ⊢ ConOp = {𝑡 ∈ ( ℋ ↑𝑚 ℋ) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑡‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑡‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)}
10	8, 9	elrab2 3333	. 2 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ConOp ↔ (𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑𝑚 ℋ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
11		ax-hilex 27240	. . . 4 ⊢ ℋ ∈ V
12	11, 11	elmap 7772	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑𝑚 ℋ) ↔ 𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ)
13	12	anbi1i 727	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ( ℋ ↑𝑚 ℋ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)) ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))
14	10, 13	bitri 263	1 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ConOp ↔ (𝑇: ℋ⟶ ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℋ ((normℎ‘(𝑤 −ℎ 𝑥)) < 𝑧 → (normℎ‘((𝑇‘𝑤) −ℎ (𝑇‘𝑥))) < 𝑦)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 195   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977  ∀wral 2896  ∃wrex 2897   class class class wbr 4583  ⟶wf 5800  ‘cfv 5804  (class class class)co 6549   ↑_𝑚 cmap 7744   < clt 9953  ℝ⁺crp 11708   ℋchil 27160  norm_ℎcno 27164   −_ℎ cmv 27166  ConOpccop 27187

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-8 1979  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-sep 4709  ax-nul 4717  ax-pow 4769  ax-pr 4833  ax-un 6847  ax-hilex 27240

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-eu 2462  df-mo 2463  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-sbc 3403  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-nul 3875  df-if 4037  df-pw 4110  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128  df-op 4132  df-uni 4373  df-br 4584  df-opab 4644  df-id 4953  df-xp 5044  df-rel 5045  df-cnv 5046  df-co 5047  df-dm 5048  df-rn 5049  df-iota 5768  df-fun 5806  df-fn 5807  df-f 5808  df-fv 5812  df-ov 6552  df-oprab 6553  df-mpt2 6554  df-map 7746  df-cnop 28083

This theorem is referenced by:  cnopc  28156  0cnop  28222  idcnop  28224  lnopconi  28277