Theorem dtruALT 4826

Description: Alternate proof of dtru 4783 which requires more axioms but is shorter and may be easier to understand.

Assuming that ZF set theory is consistent, we cannot prove this theorem unless we specify that 𝑥 and 𝑦 be distinct. Specifically, theorem spcev 3273 requires that 𝑥 must not occur in the subexpression ¬ 𝑦 = {∅} in step 4 nor in the subexpression ¬ 𝑦 = ∅ in step 9. The proof verifier will require that 𝑥 and 𝑦 be in a distinct variable group to ensure this. You can check this by deleting the $d statement in set.mm and rerunning the verifier, which will print a detailed explanation of the distinct variable violation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dtruALT	⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem dtruALT

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0inp0 4763	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → ¬ 𝑦 = {∅})
2		p0ex 4779	. . . . 5 ⊢ {∅} ∈ V
3		eqeq2 2621	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = {∅} → (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 = {∅}))
4	3	notbid 307	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = {∅} → (¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = {∅}))
5	2, 4	spcev 3273	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑦 = {∅} → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥)
6	1, 5	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥)
7		0ex 4718	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
8		eqeq2 2621	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 = ∅))
9	8	notbid 307	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = ∅))
10	7, 9	spcev 3273	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑦 = ∅ → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥)
11	6, 10	pm2.61i 175	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥
12		exnal 1744	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑥)
13		eqcom 2617	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
14	13	albii 1737	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
15	12, 14	xchbinx 323	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
16	11, 15	mpbi 219	1 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  ∀wal 1473   = wceq 1475  ∃wex 1695  ∅c0 3874  {csn 4125

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-sep 4709  ax-nul 4717  ax-pow 4769

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ne 2782  df-v 3175  df-dif 3543  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-nul 3875  df-pw 4110  df-sn 4126

This theorem is referenced by: (None)