Theorem con5VD 38158

Description: Virtual deduction proof of con5 37749. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. con5 37749 is con5VD 38158 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from con5VD 38158.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓 )   )
4::	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
5:3,4:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
qed:5:	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
con5VD	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem con5VD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idn1 37811	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   )
2		biimpr 209	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑))
3	1, 2	e1a 37873	. . . 4 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)   )
4		con3 148	. . . 4 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑) → (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓))
5	3, 4	e1a 37873	. . 3 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)   )
6		notnotb 303	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
7		imbi2 337	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)))
8	7	biimprcd 239	. . 3 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))
9	5, 6, 8	e10 37940	. 2 ⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
10	9	in1 37808	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 195

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-vd1 37807

This theorem is referenced by: (None)