Theorem cleljustALT2 2174

Description: Alternate proof of cleljust 1985. Compared with cleljustALT 2173, it uses nfv 1830 followed by equsexv 2095 instead of ax-5 1827 followed by equsexhv 2135, so it uses the idiom Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 instead of 𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑 to express non-freeness. This style is generally preferred for later theorems. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2016.) (Revised by BJ, 29-Dec-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cleljustALT2	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem cleljustALT2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1830	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
2		elequ1 1984	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦))
3	1, 2	equsexv 2095	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
4	3	bicomi 213	1 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 195   ∧ wa 383  ∃wex 1695

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-8 1979  ax-12 2034

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-an 385  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701

This theorem is referenced by: (None)