Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > cleljustALT | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Alternate proof of cleljust 1985. It is kept here and should not be modified because it is referenced on the Metamath Proof Explorer Home Page (mmset.html) as an example of how DV conditions are inherited by substitutions. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.) (Revised by BJ, 29-Dec-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
cleljustALT | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ax-5 1827 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) | |
2 | elequ1 1984 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | equsexhv 2135 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) |
4 | 3 | bicomi 213 | 1 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ↔ wb 195 ∧ wa 383 ∃wex 1695 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1713 ax-4 1728 ax-5 1827 ax-6 1875 ax-7 1922 ax-8 1979 ax-10 2006 ax-12 2034 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 196 df-an 385 df-ex 1696 df-nf 1701 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |