Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Alexander van der Vekens < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  clcllaw Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem clcllaw 41617
Description: Closure of a closed operation. (Contributed by FL, 14-Sep-2010.) (Revised by AV, 21-Jan-2020.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
clcllaw (( clLaw 𝑀𝑋𝑀𝑌𝑀) → (𝑋 𝑌) ∈ 𝑀)

Proof of Theorem clcllaw
Dummy variables 𝑚 𝑜 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-cllaw 41612 . . . 4 clLaw = {⟨𝑜, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ∀𝑥𝑚𝑦𝑚 (𝑥𝑜𝑦) ∈ 𝑚}
21bropaex12 5115 . . 3 ( clLaw 𝑀 → ( ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ V))
3 iscllaw 41615 . . . 4 (( ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ V) → ( clLaw 𝑀 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑀𝑦𝑀 (𝑥 𝑦) ∈ 𝑀))
4 ovrspc2v 6571 . . . . 5 (((𝑋𝑀𝑌𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑥𝑀𝑦𝑀 (𝑥 𝑦) ∈ 𝑀) → (𝑋 𝑌) ∈ 𝑀)
54expcom 450 . . . 4 (∀𝑥𝑀𝑦𝑀 (𝑥 𝑦) ∈ 𝑀 → ((𝑋𝑀𝑌𝑀) → (𝑋 𝑌) ∈ 𝑀))
63, 5syl6bi 242 . . 3 (( ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ V) → ( clLaw 𝑀 → ((𝑋𝑀𝑌𝑀) → (𝑋 𝑌) ∈ 𝑀)))
72, 6mpcom 37 . 2 ( clLaw 𝑀 → ((𝑋𝑀𝑌𝑀) → (𝑋 𝑌) ∈ 𝑀))
873impib 1254 1 (( clLaw 𝑀𝑋𝑀𝑌𝑀) → (𝑋 𝑌) ∈ 𝑀)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 383  w3a 1031  wcel 1977  wral 2896  Vcvv 3173   class class class wbr 4583  (class class class)co 6549   clLaw ccllaw 41609
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-sep 4709  ax-nul 4717  ax-pr 4833
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-eu 2462  df-mo 2463  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-nul 3875  df-if 4037  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128  df-op 4132  df-uni 4373  df-br 4584  df-opab 4644  df-xp 5044  df-iota 5768  df-fv 5812  df-ov 6552  df-cllaw 41612
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator