Theorem ceqsalv 3206

Description: A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceqsalv.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
ceqsalv.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsalv	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsalv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1830	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2		ceqsalv.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
3		ceqsalv.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	1, 2, 3	ceqsal 3205	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 195  ∀wal 1473   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977  Vcvv 3173

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-12 2034  ax-ext 2590

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-v 3175

This theorem is referenced by:  ralxpxfr2d  3298  clel2  3309  clel4  3312  frsn  5112  raliunxp  5183  fv3  6116  funimass4  6157  marypha2lem3  8226  kmlem12  8866  fpwwe2lem12  9342  vdwmc2  15521  itg2leub  23307  nmoubi  27011  choc0  27569  nmopub  28151  nmfnleub  28168  heibor1lem  32778  elmapintrab  36901