Theorem asclpropd 19167

Description: If two structures have the same components (properties), one is an associative algebra iff the other one is. The last hypotheses on 1_r can be discharged either by letting 𝑊 = V (if strong equality is known on ·_𝑠) or assuming 𝐾 is a ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
asclpropd.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝐾)
asclpropd.g	⊢ 𝐺 = (Scalar‘𝐿)
asclpropd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐹))
asclpropd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺))
asclpropd.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
asclpropd.4	⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) = (1r‘𝐿))
asclpropd.5	⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
asclpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (algSc‘𝐾) = (algSc‘𝐿))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐾   𝑥,𝐿,𝑦   𝑥,𝑃,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑊,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem asclpropd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		asclpropd.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊)
2		asclpropd.3	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
3	2	oveqrspc2v 6572	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)))
4	3	anassrs 678	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)))
5	1, 4	mpidan 701	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)))
6		asclpropd.4	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) = (1r‘𝐿))
7	6	oveq2d 6565	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
8	7	adantr 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
9	5, 8	eqtrd 2644	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
10	9	mpteq2dva 4672	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))))
11		asclpropd.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐹))
12	11	mpteq1d 4666	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))))
13		asclpropd.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺))
14	13	mpteq1d 4666	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))))
15	10, 12, 14	3eqtr3d 2652	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))))
16		eqid 2610	. . 3 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐾) = (algSc‘𝐾)
17		asclpropd.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝐾)
18		eqid 2610	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐹) = (Base‘𝐹)
19		eqid 2610	. . 3 ⊢ ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾) = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)
20		eqid 2610	. . 3 ⊢ (1r‘𝐾) = (1r‘𝐾)
21	16, 17, 18, 19, 20	asclfval 19155	. 2 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐾) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)))
22		eqid 2610	. . 3 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐿) = (algSc‘𝐿)
23		asclpropd.g	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = (Scalar‘𝐿)
24		eqid 2610	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺)
25		eqid 2610	. . 3 ⊢ ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿) = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)
26		eqid 2610	. . 3 ⊢ (1r‘𝐿) = (1r‘𝐿)
27	22, 23, 24, 25, 26	asclfval 19155	. 2 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐿) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
28	15, 21, 27	3eqtr4g 2669	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (algSc‘𝐾) = (algSc‘𝐿))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977   ↦ cmpt 4643  ‘cfv 5804  (class class class)co 6549  Basecbs 15695  Scalarcsca 15771   ·_𝑠 cvsca 15772  1_rcur 18324  algSccascl 19132

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-8 1979  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-rep 4699  ax-sep 4709  ax-nul 4717  ax-pow 4769  ax-pr 4833

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-eu 2462  df-mo 2463  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ne 2782  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-reu 2903  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-sbc 3403  df-csb 3500  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-nul 3875  df-if 4037  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128  df-op 4132  df-uni 4373  df-iun 4457  df-br 4584  df-opab 4644  df-mpt 4645  df-id 4953  df-xp 5044  df-rel 5045  df-cnv 5046  df-co 5047  df-dm 5048  df-rn 5049  df-res 5050  df-ima 5051  df-iota 5768  df-fun 5806  df-fn 5807  df-f 5808  df-f1 5809  df-fo 5810  df-f1o 5811  df-fv 5812  df-ov 6552  df-slot 15699  df-base 15700  df-ascl 19135

This theorem is referenced by:  ply1ascl  19449