Theorem arwhom 16524

Description: The second component of an arrow is the corresponding morphism (without the domain/codomain tag). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
arwrcl.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)
arwhom.j	⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
arwhom	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)𝐽(coda‘𝐹)))

Proof of Theorem arwhom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		arwrcl.a	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Arrow‘𝐶)
2		eqid 2610	. . 3 ⊢ (Homa‘𝐶) = (Homa‘𝐶)
3	1, 2	arwhoma 16518	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐹 ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)(Homa‘𝐶)(coda‘𝐹)))
4		arwhom.j	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐶)
5	2, 4	homahom 16512	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)(Homa‘𝐶)(coda‘𝐹)) → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)𝐽(coda‘𝐹)))
6	3, 5	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 → (2nd ‘𝐹) ∈ ((doma‘𝐹)𝐽(coda‘𝐹)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977  ‘cfv 5804  (class class class)co 6549  2^nd c2nd 7058  Hom chom 15779  dom_acdoma 16493  cod_accoda 16494  Arrowcarw 16495  Hom_achoma 16496

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-8 1979  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-rep 4699  ax-sep 4709  ax-nul 4717  ax-pow 4769  ax-pr 4833  ax-un 6847

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-eu 2462  df-mo 2463  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ne 2782  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-reu 2903  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-sbc 3403  df-csb 3500  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-nul 3875  df-if 4037  df-pw 4110  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128  df-op 4132  df-uni 4373  df-iun 4457  df-br 4584  df-opab 4644  df-mpt 4645  df-id 4953  df-xp 5044  df-rel 5045  df-cnv 5046  df-co 5047  df-dm 5048  df-rn 5049  df-res 5050  df-ima 5051  df-iota 5768  df-fun 5806  df-fn 5807  df-f 5808  df-f1 5809  df-fo 5810  df-f1o 5811  df-fv 5812  df-ov 6552  df-1st 7059  df-2nd 7060  df-doma 16497  df-coda 16498  df-homa 16499  df-arw 16500

This theorem is referenced by: (None)