4sqlem1 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 4sqlem1		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem 4sqlem1 15490

Description: Lemma for 4sq 15506. The set 𝑆 is the set of all numbers that are expressible as a sum of four squares. Our goal is to show that 𝑆 = ℕ₀; here we show one subset direction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
4sq.1	⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
4sqlem1	⊢ 𝑆 ⊆ ℕ₀

Distinct variable groups: 𝑤,𝑛,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝑆,𝑛 Allowed substitution hints: 𝑆(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

**Proof of Theorem 4sqlem1**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		4sq.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}
2		zsqcl2 12803	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℤ → (𝑥↑2) ∈ ℕ₀)
3		zsqcl2 12803	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℤ → (𝑦↑2) ∈ ℕ₀)
4		nn0addcl 11205	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑥↑2) ∈ ℕ₀ ∧ (𝑦↑2) ∈ ℕ₀) → ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) ∈ ℕ₀)
5	2, 3, 4	syl2an 493	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) ∈ ℕ₀)
6		zsqcl2 12803	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ℤ → (𝑧↑2) ∈ ℕ₀)
7		zsqcl2 12803	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ℤ → (𝑤↑2) ∈ ℕ₀)
8		nn0addcl 11205	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑧↑2) ∈ ℕ₀ ∧ (𝑤↑2) ∈ ℕ₀) → ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)) ∈ ℕ₀)
9	6, 7, 8	syl2an 493	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)) ∈ ℕ₀)
10		nn0addcl 11205	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) ∈ ℕ₀ ∧ ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)) ∈ ℕ₀) → (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) ∈ ℕ₀)
11	5, 9, 10	syl2an 493	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) ∈ ℕ₀)
12		eleq1a 2683	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) ∈ ℕ₀ → (𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) → 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀))
13	11, 12	syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℤ)) → (𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) → 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀))
14	13	rexlimdvva 3020	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ) → (∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) → 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀))
15	14	rexlimivv 3018	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) → 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀)
16	15	abssi 3640	. 2 ⊢ {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⊆ ℕ₀
17	1, 16	eqsstri 3598	1 ⊢ 𝑆 ⊆ ℕ₀

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 383 = wceq 1475 ∈ wcel 1977 {cab 2596 ∃wrex 2897 ⊆ wss 3540 (class class class)co 6549 + caddc 9818 2c2 10947 ℕ₀cn0 11169 ℤcz 11254 ↑cexp 12722

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1713 ax-4 1728 ax-5 1827 ax-6 1875 ax-7 1922 ax-8 1979 ax-9 1986 ax-10 2006 ax-11 2021 ax-12 2034 ax-13 2234 ax-ext 2590 ax-sep 4709 ax-nul 4717 ax-pow 4769 ax-pr 4833 ax-un 6847 ax-cnex 9871 ax-resscn 9872 ax-1cn 9873 ax-icn 9874 ax-addcl 9875 ax-addrcl 9876 ax-mulcl 9877 ax-mulrcl 9878 ax-mulcom 9879 ax-addass 9880 ax-mulass 9881 ax-distr 9882 ax-i2m1 9883 ax-1ne0 9884 ax-1rid 9885 ax-rnegex 9886 ax-rrecex 9887 ax-cnre 9888 ax-pre-lttri 9889 ax-pre-lttrn 9890 ax-pre-ltadd 9891 ax-pre-mulgt0 9892

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 196 df-or 384 df-an 385 df-3or 1032 df-3an 1033 df-tru 1478 df-ex 1696 df-nf 1701 df-sb 1868 df-eu 2462 df-mo 2463 df-clab 2597 df-cleq 2603 df-clel 2606 df-nfc 2740 df-ne 2782 df-nel 2783 df-ral 2901 df-rex 2902 df-reu 2903 df-rab 2905 df-v 3175 df-sbc 3403 df-csb 3500 df-dif 3543 df-un 3545 df-in 3547 df-ss 3554 df-pss 3556 df-nul 3875 df-if 4037 df-pw 4110 df-sn 4126 df-pr 4128 df-tp 4130 df-op 4132 df-uni 4373 df-iun 4457 df-br 4584 df-opab 4644 df-mpt 4645 df-tr 4681 df-eprel 4949 df-id 4953 df-po 4959 df-so 4960 df-fr 4997 df-we 4999 df-xp 5044 df-rel 5045 df-cnv 5046 df-co 5047 df-dm 5048 df-rn 5049 df-res 5050 df-ima 5051 df-pred 5597 df-ord 5643 df-on 5644 df-lim 5645 df-suc 5646 df-iota 5768 df-fun 5806 df-fn 5807 df-f 5808 df-f1 5809 df-fo 5810 df-f1o 5811 df-fv 5812 df-riota 6511 df-ov 6552 df-oprab 6553 df-mpt2 6554 df-om 6958 df-2nd 7060 df-wrecs 7294 df-recs 7355 df-rdg 7393 df-er 7629 df-en 7842 df-dom 7843 df-sdom 7844 df-pnf 9955 df-mnf 9956 df-xr 9957 df-ltxr 9958 df-le 9959 df-sub 10147 df-neg 10148 df-nn 10898 df-2 10956 df-n0 11170 df-z 11255 df-uz 11564 df-seq 12664 df-exp 12723

This theorem is referenced by: 4sqlem19 15505

W3C validator